Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

11:45 a.m. • 5-23-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 74° F
  • Sat: Clear.
    • Hi: 72° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-10-16 22:18:00
Updated: 2012-10-21 14:45:56

McCrory, Dalton dogged by old questions


Dalton and McCrory debate
Dalton and McCrory debate
print friendly

Republican Pat McCrory and Democrat Walter Dalton could not move past questions that have dogged their respective campaigns as they met for a second debate Tuesday night. 

Many of the answers delivered at UNC-TV's studios in Research Triangle Park were similar to lines delivered in the first debate two weeks ago. That first debate appears to have had little impact on the polls, which constantly show Dalton trailing by 10 to 12 percentage points. 

Asked about that commanding lead during the debate, McCrory said he didn't take it for granted.

"I don't trust the polls. We're going to work until the polls close on November 6th," he said.

Going into Tuesday's debate, political observers generally agreed that McCrory's foremost job was to avoid a gaffe that would somehow change the campaign's narrative. But he had room to improve his position.

"Pat (McCrory) can help himself with a few specifics," said Duke University economist and political science professor Mike Munger. "If he gives specific answers to even a few questions, then the vague platitudes on the big questions won't be so noticeable."

McCrory's biggest opportunity to do that during the debate was on a tax question. McCrory says that he wants to lower the income tax, corporate tax rate and perhaps the gas tax. Dalton challenged that plan.

"Where is the beef? Where is he going to find the $11 billion to do that," Dalton asked. The Democrat said McCrory would have to raise sales taxes in order to accomplish all that.

McCrory said Dalton's sales tax assertion was misleading. 

"The only person who has asked for a sales tax increase are Beverly Perdue and Walter Dalton," McCrory said, pointing to fact checks of Dalton's claim by media outlets. 

However, McCrory didn't describe how he would offset the tax cuts he proposes. 

Asked after the debate how he would pay for those tax cuts, McCrory answered, "I've discussed that with several reporters," saying that he'd be glad to do so again. 

Pressed on the question, "Well again, I've described that before and I'll describe it again one-on-one at another time."

Asked a third time if he could answer the question, McCrory walked away saying, "I have answered the question."

Jack Hawke, an adviser to the McCrory campaign who was on hand for the debate, said that McCrory has outlined goals for reducing tax rates.

"If you give every single detail of a tax plan, how is that a bipartisan, bringing people together?" Hawke said. McCrory wants to work with his political opposition. "You can't tell them what you're going to do. You have to bring them to the table and discuss, to come to the conclusions of what you're ultimately going to do." 

That lack of response drew criticism from Democrats.

"I think we saw Pat McCrory spend an hour on TV and not answer a single question," said Andrew Whalen, a consultant and former executive director of the North Carolina Democratic Party. 

But Hawke said offering specifics wouldn't do McCrory, or the state, much good in the long run. 

"You're demanding the details. You're demanding he put together something that will be dead on arrival," Hawke said. 

Meanwhile, Dalton struggled to at once define himself as an experienced hand and as someone who hasn't had his hand on the levers of power.

On a question about eliminating government waste, Dalton said he agreed with McCrory that North Carolina needed eliminate redundant boards and commissions.

"I'm glad he agrees with that. The question is why hasn't he done anything about it," McCrory said. "He was the head of the Senate budget committee, he was the lieutenant governor the last four years. He had an opportunity to show leadership to do something about something that's very, very obvious ... Real leadership would have already dealt with that."

Asked after the debate how he reconciled his experience with his lack of control, Dalton compared his time in state government to a college sports player "coming out and going to the pros. Look at what I did in college, but let me get on the pro team and see how it works."

Asked if he was calling the General Assembly "college," Dalton said no, he was just making an analogy.

"There is a difference in the experience that prepares you for a position and actually taking the position itself," he said. 

Dalton and McCrory will face off one more time during a debate on Oct. 24 sponsored by WRAL, North Carolina Wesleyan College and the Rocky Mount Area Chamber of Commerce.


44 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 44 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Again, this is interesting, since I have not seen even one study that suggests that the provisions so far in effect have diminished any jobs at all. I would love for you to show me the studies you are referencing, though. Also interesting because most of the provisions of "Obamacare" have not even taken effect."----jason19

Typical democrat response, you have to take them by the hand to show them things that they could find on their own if they would just take those blinders off.

"You really need a lesson in economics."------Hersh

Democrats need a lesson in economics. You keep repeating the same lines thinking that someone will believe them. They are based on false premises and not in reality. Even history shows the accuracy of the simple logic of cutting spending to increase revenue.

Even my 6 year old kid understands that.

"Demand creates more jobs which depends not only on spending but on efficiency of workers, factories, etc. Another of several flaws in your logic is that there are many things made overseas that we buy. Simply spending more doesn't mean more jobs here. Now If you don't want a clean environment, that's on you. If you want to cut things like food safety in the name of tax cuts, that's on you. If you don't want to name the billions you'd cut, it shows that you are a fraud repeating lines you heard on a right wing radio station."----Hersh

Yes, you would cut something like an environmental program or something that helps out kids. Instead of cutting the $100 million dollars to watch grass grow. It is that inept stance that has created the fiscal problems NC faces now.

You do not have to cut environmental programs, food safety programs or childrens programs. These are only talking points from mindless democrats that do not understand simple economics and getting rid of pork.

"My former employer laid off engineers and added finance people (accountants) after Sarbanes-Oxley came into existence." --- Interesting, because I know of several that actually hired additional workers to comply with the law.

"Obama Care is and continues to be a massive job killer." --- Again, this is interesting, since I have not seen even one study that suggests that the provisions so far in effect have diminished any jobs at all. I would love for you to show me the studies you are referencing, though. Also interesting because most of the provisions of "Obamacare" have not even taken effect.

"Damien, I am sure you mean well, but studies have shown this largely not to have been the case throughout modern history, other than a few outliers. So if low rates create jobs, why don't we have more jobs now?"

Because our taxes are not low. the Rate is just one factor for business. As you operate, you get hit with additional taxes, fees, etc... My former employer laid off engineers and added finance people (accountants) after Sarbanes-Oxley came into existence. So they eliminated people that helped them design and produce products because they had to accommodate providing all the additional information required by that law to the Federal Government. A double whammy. So in effect from a business standpoint it has the same impact as a tax. You are putting out money and the return to the company for that money is zero. Obama Care is and continues to be a massive job killer. Sadly it is also harmful to our entire health care system.

View Comments VIEW ALL 44 COMMENTS

Political Video Picks

 
  • Gov. Pat McCrory and Raleigh Mayor Nancy McFarlane will come together Thursday morning at a news conference to discuss the ongoing…

  • Senators gave tentative approval Wednesday to a $20.6 billion budget that Republican leaders say will help right North Carolina…

  • The House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously Wednesday afternoon to rewrite Senate-passed legislation in an attempt to resolve the…

  • In an interview Tuesday, May 21, Gov. Pat McCrory said he is pleased with the progress on the state budget and tax reform so far.

  • Capitol Bureau Chief Laura Leslie and investigative reporter Mark Binker break down the North Carolina Senate's budget proposal.

  • The Senate budget subcommittee on health and human services gives a presentation on May 20, 2013.