Local News

Raleigh couple found not guilty of providing alcohol to minors

Posted July 31, 2015

— A Raleigh couple charged with supplying alcohol to minors at a June 2014 wedding has been found not guilty.

Dr. Charles and Kimberly Matthews were acquitted Friday on four counts each of aiding and abetting the consumption of alcohol by minors.

Jurors in Wake County Superior Court spent a total of about two hours deliberating on Thursday and Friday. On Friday morning, jurors spent about an hour examining 30 time-stamped photos from the wedding as well as copies of text messages. They were required to view the evidence in the courtroom at the request of defense attorney, Hart Miles.

The couple’s son, Thomas Matthews, 19, who pleaded guilty to underage purchase of alcohol on Monday, was sentenced following the verdict in his parent’s case to 45 days in jail suspended, 18 months of unsupervised probation as well as 40 hours of community service. He must also surrender his driver’s license and will remain on probation until he is 21.

Prior to sentencing, Thomas Matthews’ attorney asked the judge to consider his clients' age, academic achievement, volunteer work and lack of prior convictions in the decision.

After leaving a wedding at the Matthewses home, Jonathan “JT” Taylor, 18, died in a drunken driving crash. The couple is still facing a civil lawsuit filed against them by Taylor’s family.

“JT will always be a memory for me. He will always stay with me, physically on my body and in my heart,” said Thomas Matthews prior to sentencing.

Speaking to the judge Friday afternoon, Thomas Matthews said that, due to his intoxicated state, he could not recall with confidence why Taylor decided to get behind the wheel that night. He also stated that he could not remember the last time he saw or spoke with Taylor.

“Thomas and JT Taylor were best friends and he loved him like a brother. He always will,” said Smith.

Superior Court Judge Osmond Smith said prior to sentencing that the case was not about compensating the Taylor family for the loss of their son but about responsibility. As he spoke, Taylor’s mother wiped away tears.

“There’s nothing the court can do here to bring JT back to the Earth to his parents,” said Osmond Smith. “There’s nothing to repair or remove the heartache that they have. Nothing will remove the feeling they likely have every morning when they wake up that the loss of their son is still there, it’s real, it’s permanent.”

The Taylor family issued the following statement through their attorney, Landon White, after the verdicts:

"Providing alcohol to underage persons is a serious issue and against the law. Such laws are in place to minimize the risk of tragedies such as the death of J.T. The Taylors are disappointed with the outcome, but respect due process and the jury’s decision. Despite the outcome, this case should create awareness that it is not okay to provide alcohol to underage persons, much less for adults and parents to provide alcohol to underage persons. If one life can be saved from awareness of this issue, the loss of J.T. will not be in vain. The Taylors would like to thank Jason Waller and others with the Wake County District Attorney’s Office who sought justice for J.T."

Deliberation on the case against the Matthewses began late Thursday afternoon, after closing statements from both attorneys.

In his closing arguments, Miles pointed out that it is legal to serve alcohol in a home and that there was no indication that the couple told bartenders at the event to serve alcohol to minors. In addition, Hart said it was the responsibility of the bartenders to check identification before serving alcohol.

He also noted that, in many respects, 18-year-olds are considered young adults and questioned whether parents should be held responsible for their decisions.

He said in looking through 4,000 photos from the event, police did not find a picture that showed the couple alongside teenagers with wine.

"I submit to you they are not criminals, and they should not be held criminally accountable for what happened," he said.

The parents tried unsuccessfully to get their case dismissed, claiming they were unfairly discriminated against by the Wake County District Attorney's Office because neither the bartenders nor the person who sold their son the alcohol were charged.

Wake County District Attorney Lorrin Freeman said Friday she believed there was enough evidence to take the case to trial, and she respects the jury's decision.

"We lose way too many young people as a result of underage drinking. Too many lives are cut short," she said. "If we've managed to highlight an issue and prevent one person from losing their life, it will have been worth it."

Miles said his clients "take no joy" in their acquittal and that will always think about Taylor.

"If they had any idea JT was going to drive, of course they would have intervened," he said. "It's a tragedy."

Miles also said the couple is thankful the emotionally charged case is over.

"The Matthewses have been publicly accused and ridiculed, and now a jury has told them they're not guilty. Hopefully, this will bring some measure of closure," he said.

Juror Timothy Monroe said when deliberations started, most jurors agreed on the final verdict.

He said jurors "could not be sure the Matthewses knew the minors were drinking," and they had to be sure beyond a reasonable doubt.

Monroe said jurors looked at numerous pictures from the wedding, and none showed the couple interacting with the minors.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Paul Jones Aug 2, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Many agree with what opinion? That money buys one's way out of trouble or that these folks are not guilty.

    I'll not deny that money helps in cases where a guilty person walks. OJ Simpse comes to mind. However, it doesn't always work. At the same time, many Durham hoodlums are on the street killing weekly using guns they're not even legally allowed to own, because the system is often too generous. And the hoodlums don't care, as they have nothing to lose, as far as they're concerned.

    As for this case, most agreec with what I said. They didn't serve alcohol to minors. It's not even illegal in many states and countries. NC is just a bit backward.

    Importantly, they had nothing to do with the boy who killed himself. He got drunk on hard whiskey that had nothing to do with these folks or their party. It's his fault.

    But you made it personal by talking about them being comfortable in their big house. I don't know them, but didn't like that.

  • Skye Thompson Aug 2, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    "...didn't break no law". Wonderful! Two negatives in a sentence is a double negative, which negate each other. Effectively, you just admitted to breaking a law. Since you have communicated threats, you actually have broken a law. A reasonable person would reasonably assume you mean these people harm.

  • Elizabeth Anne Wells Aug 2, 2015
    user avatar

    Paul Jones, there are a lot of posters who disagree with you; but, you focus on me. I have a right to my opinion...the Constitution gives me that right. I must have hit a nerve with you although I don't understand why. The truth of the matter is that none of us know how we would react given the same situation. I have lost a child and let me tell you that the pain never stops..I dare say that your opinion or the Matthews' opinion would have been quite different if it had been one of your children. My comment was not out of jealousy. I am quite happy with my life, thanks. Maybe you think money has nothing to do with justice, but it does. I dare say that people who can afford a good attorney fair a lot better than those who have a court-appointed attorney. And, I am sorry; but, a lot of cases are decided before court is even in session. I am not saying this is the case here. It all boils down to I am entitled to my opinion just as you are entitled to yours...plain and simple.

  • Paul Jones Aug 2, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    I'm doing fine, thanks. But, your comment seems to be filled with jealousy. This wasn't about how much justice one can afford. This was a nonsensical court case. This couple had a wedding and, themselves, served no alcohol. The man that died was drunk drinking Jack Daniels and from being stoned.

    But you then comment about them taking comfort in their "big ol' house." Sounds like more jealousy. Why phrase it like that?

    You should be congratulating them for winning the case. You should recognize that adults are responsible for themselves.

  • Elizabeth Anne Wells Aug 1, 2015
    user avatar

    I mean being educated...

  • Elizabeth Anne Wells Aug 1, 2015
    user avatar

    Paul Jones - No, I don't have a problem with people being education and doing well. My daughter is a cardiologist and my son-in-law is an orthopedic surgeon. I graduated from Duke University...and, you??

  • Paul Jones Aug 1, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    I don't think it was money that got then out, but common sense of the jury.

    And are you hating on these people for getting an education and getting paid well?

  • Paul Donovan Aug 1, 2015
    user avatar

    I wonder what happened to the ABC employee that sold Jack Daniels to a minor ? I empathize with the parents who lost their 18 year old son but there was no evidence presented that showed the Matthews had any responsibility in this. The bartender hired should have been checking ID's if the young man was drinking at the wedding. As sad as it is, once your child turns 18, they are then considered an adult and are responsible for their decisions. He made bad decisions and paid the ultimate price.

  • Robert Fotch Jr Aug 1, 2015
    user avatar

    😂I hope the Matthews can find some compassion in that big old house of theirs.

    Read more at http://www.wral.com/matthews-couple-awaits-jury-decision/14803995/#CEfuC3fmsrV10yLM.99
    Part of your post i agree with, however, in reality, the parents shouldn't be held accountable. Their son should have never plead guilty either. Once you turn eighteen, your on your own. If your old enough to die for this country, your old enough to drink in it! Anybody with good common sense should know that. However tragic this may be, justice was served IMO.

  • Elizabeth Anne Wells Jul 31, 2015
    user avatar

    LEE ROY - Not liberal at all. I am as conservative as they come and I believe that the law applies to everyone...even rich doctors and their families.