Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

9:20 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Scans save lives, but cost a lot, increase radiation exposure


e-mail print friendly
CT scan
CT scan

Diagnostic scanning saves thousands of lives every year, but it might also be overused, contributing to skyrocketing health care costs and increasing Americans' exposure to dangerous radiation.

A recent study found that a dramatic increase in diagnostic tests – including X-rays, CT scans and mammograms – means that Americans are exposed to seven times more radiation than they were 30 years ago.

Many doctors say that such testing is essential for treating patients.

"A great example is a mammogram. We absolutely know that a mammogram saves lives," said Dr. Ronald Ennis, a radiation oncologist at St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital in New York.

Mahshid Toghanian learned that she had breast cancer through a routine mammogram. The scan caught it at stage 1, early enough to save her life.

"I was doing self breast exams all the time, but I never felt anything, never found anything with the exam. But they were able to find it with the mammogram," Toghanian.

Doctors say that advances in diagnostic scans eliminate the need for exploratory surgery in many cases, but too much radiation can increase cancer risk.

"A rough estimate for a CAT scan is that it could cause cancer five, 10, 15, 20 years down the road in about 1 in 10,000 people," Ennis said.

The dramatic increase in the use of such scans is one reason why health care costs have skyrocketed. Recent studies, government reports and media articles have accused some doctors and hospitals of doing many unnecessary scans to cure their financial woes.

A government study found that Medicare spending on imaging has doubled since 2000 to about $14 billion a year.

Toghanian, who is in remission after surgery and radiation for her breast cancer, said that such scans are well worth the cost.

The American College of Radiology and other medical groups were developing national standards for the appropriate use of diagnostic imaging.

e-mail print friendly

3 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments 3 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
What would be the cost of treating patients long term , if not for the benefit of early detection. MRI and ultrasound use no radiation. So we don;t have a true sense of what cost might be for treating pts with late detection. The study means nothing.

sounds like the insurance companies are complaining about having to pay out the $$ less for them to pocket

no mention of MRI's. By-the-way what good is the advancement of medicine if we can't or won't use it?

View Comments 3 COMMENTS
advertisement