Signs of problems in the United States health-care system abound, but some doctors fear attempts to improve the system might ruin what's right with it.
Around 47 million people in the U.S. don't have health insurance, and medical bills are related in some way to half of all bankruptcies. Affordable health care is a prominent part in presidential campaigns from both parties.
The number of people leaving the U.S. for medical tourism is growing, Dr. Kevin Schulman, a health economist at Duke University, said. For example, in India, a new heart hospital charges $2,000 for heart bypass surgery, he said.
"The cost in Medicare here in the United States would be 20 times that," he said.
Besides lower costs, foreign hospitals can also offer excellent care, Schulman said. "We think the quality of surgery, actually, in France or in western Europe is very high," he said.
In health systems, like those in Canada, France and the U.K., care is treated as a right, instead of commodity, but long waits for some tests and treatments can be a problem.
Cathy Wright said she was aware of the pros and cons of U.S. and foreign health-care systems when she needed a second hip surgery. For both her surgeries, she shopped around the world for the best place, in terms of cost and quality.
A French surgeon had replaced her other hip in an earlier surgery, but Wright said, "I didn't have a good recuperation, so I wouldn't recommend it there."
Wright said she chose to not buy insurance, so the costs of surgery in the U.S. might be prohibitive. "The prices in America are just excessive compared to anywhere else in the world," she said.
Wright ultimately turned to orthopedic surgeon Dr. Scott Kelly at the North Carolina Orthopedic Clinic.
"I still think the top methods are probably here," she said.
For Wright, Kelly used a muscle-sparing hip replacement, a technique perfected in the U.S. "I stopped walking with the cane after about a week," she said.
Wright's gamble that th higher price in the U.S. would buy her better results and quicker results paid off, but millions face declining health or death because modern medical advances are simply not available to them.
Kelly said access to affordable care needs fixing.
"The danger, though, is throwing the baby out with the bathwater and revamping the system, and damaging what we do well - which is the higher-end, more technical surgical aspects of medicine in America," he said.





WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
If you are being treated for self-inflicted damage, why does society and or govt need to pay for it?
September 23, 2007 6:54 p.m.
September 23, 2007 3:48 p.m.
People who are sick feel worse at night, so why aren't more hospitals and private clinics recognizing that fact?
September 23, 2007 3:25 p.m.
One. institute a system of self-triage in concert with pharmacies. For instance...right now I have an earache. So what do I do? I take an antihistamine and a decongestant. If it does not clear up in two days, I go to the doctor for antibiotics. If that doesn't work in five days or so, I go back to the doctor for more testing. The whole cost there is perhaps $200 unless I can self-prescribe antibiotics in which case the cost drops to zero for the medical car part. Or I could just go to the emergency room now and in two days and they will do the exact same thing at a cost of $2,500.
By allowing a pharmasist to use any number of different flow charts -- a process that doctors use in diagnosis without the actual chart -- we could save a ton of money and free up a lot of doctors for real emergencies and cases that are not everyday occurances.
More...
September 23, 2007 3:19 p.m.
If you state that healthcare is not a "right", then you should also agree that access to food and shelter is also not a right. You have to pay for those too. I assume you would complain if you were denied access to grocery stores and the housing market. You might then consider it your "right", correct? No one is saying that healthcare should be given away for free, only that access for everyone and reasonable cost be available. We are the ONLY industrialized nation on the face of the earth that does not provide universal access for everyone. Further, there are effective and efficient ways to render care with a combination of private and public resources, so it doesn't have to be all government programs.
September 23, 2007 1:12 p.m.