Lawmakers drafting anti-patent troll bill

Posted April 3, 2014


— North Carolina lawmakers are drafting legislation to combat patent trolls, shell companies that attempt to win quick settlements from businesses by threatening patent infringement lawsuits. 

"Patent suits are extremely expensive," said John Boswell, the chief legal officer for Cary-based software maker SAS.

Speaking to the Joint Legislation Economic Development and Global Engagement Oversight Committee Thursday, Boswell gave lawmakers an example of one case that SAS had recently defended. It cost the company $8 million in legal fees and research to defend the case, which it ultimately won. A federal court awarded SAS $200,000 in the case. 

The kicker: the company that had brought the patent suit against SAS had only $300 in the bank.

"Companies all across North Carolina, large and small, are being abused by patent trolls. We see claims being made against coffee shops, retailers. Every bank that has an ATM machine is being sued," Boswell said.

Patent trolls are sometimes called NPEs or "non-practicing entities." Most often, they are limited liability companies that don't make anything themselves or provide any services. Rather, they buy patents from companies that have gone bankrupt, and they make money by getting other businesses to pay licensing fees for the use of those patents. 

Clearly, patent troll is a derogatory term, but it is one widely used by those who write about this category of business. Many companies choose to settle cases regardless of the merits because they are so expensive to defend. Of patent troll cases that do go to court, Boswell said, 90 percent are settled in favor of the targeted company. 

For those companies like SAS, the problem is a patent troll has very little at risk and won't have to make good when ordered to pay restitution.

The bill being considered by North Carolina lawmakers would allow state courts to look behind the shell of patent LLCs and collect judgments against the individuals behind the company. The measure was included in the committee's official recommendations to the 2014 General Assembly session, which begins in May.

Similar legislation is being considered in more than 20 other states. There is also a federal bill, but it is tied up in a gridlocked Congress.

"If the federal government had acted on this issue, we wouldn't have to be taking action at the state level," said Rep. Tom Murry, R-Wake, one of the committee's chairmen.


This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Matt Wood Apr 4, 2014
    user avatar

    "The bill being considered by North Carolina lawmakers would allow state courts to look behind the shell of patent LLCs and collect judgments against the individuals behind the company. "

    They'd better be careful with this one, it could start the "slippery slope" to holding individuals running corporations accountable for everything the corporation does, and you KNOW they don't want that!

  • Don Dickerson Apr 4, 2014
    user avatar

    And so exactly why did "they" ever make buying patents from defunct companies with no plans to actually produce anything protected by the patents legal?

  • goldenosprey Apr 4, 2014

    On one side there is a danger that making access to courts more difficult is just another in a string of endless victories for large, well funded corporations. But in balance, the "trolls" here are nothing more than opportunists who produce nothing, who do not move life-improving products to market. Sanctions are in place in all 50 states and DC for lawyers who bring frivolous suits.

  • TheRealist1953 Apr 3, 2014

    Stopping "trolls" is a needed idea -- there is a town in Texas that does nothing but hold "trials" for such trolls.
    But not only should the government "look behind" these companies to go after the people really DOING the suits, they should go after the Lawyers bringing suits that they KNOW are false. [now THERE is some money to take for restitution.]