Local News

Jurors hear heated exchanges between Smith, police in taped interview

Posted February 8

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— On the fifth day of testimony, jurors in the trial of Travion Smith witnessed heated exchanges between the defendant and Raleigh police Detective Eric Gibney in a videotaped interrogation.

Smith, 23, is charged with first-degree murder in 30-year-old Melissa Huggins-Jones' death and could face the death penalty if convicted.

Huggins-Jones had recently divorced and moved from Tennessee to an apartment complex off Six Forks Road, where she started a new job and a new life caring for her 8-year-old daughter, Hannah Olivia Jones.

On the morning of May 14, 2013, Hannah wandered out of the apartment and approached a nearby construction crew, asking for help. A construction worker followed the girl back into the apartment and found Huggins-Jones dead in her bed, covered in blood.

An autopsy determined she had died from repeated blows to her head and neck.

According to investigators, a laptop stolen from Huggins-Jones' apartment complex connected Smith to the murder.

On Monday, there was a lot of debate between the attorneys and the judge as to what parts, if any, of a videotaped interrogation would be shown to the jury. The judge ruled on which parts would be allowed, and late Monday afternoon, the jury witnessed Smith speak for the first time.

Smith and his co-defendents, Ronald Lee Anthony and Sarah Rene Redden, were questioned by police when initially identified as suspects. Investigators used their statements against one another.

Anthony pleaded guilty in 2015 to first-degree murder in Huggins-Jones’ death and was sentenced to life in prison. Redden testified for the state against Smith last week and hopes to get a lesser sentence as a result.

During the interview, Gibney told Smith he needed to come clean because he was not just looking at a theft charge - he was looking at something much more serious.

"Right now, that computer is putting you in the middle of a murder investigation," Gibney said.

Smith denied knowing anything about the murder.

"You can tell I don't believe you, right?” Gibney said. "What you are saying right now does not make a lick of sense."

Outside the presence of the jury, there was talk about the tactics police use in interrogations, including calling suspects liars, telling them they have evidence to prove their guilt or putting them at a certain location connected to a crime - all of which are legal.

The jury is expected to hear the rest of the videotaped interrogation on Tuesday.

Earlier in the day, Detective Sean Brady described the crime scene the way he found it that morning.

"There was blood on her face, blood on the wall...teeth missing," he said. "We were there for days. No one was allowed to come in or out."

He also testified to obtaining search warrants to look for evidence in Huggins-Jones' apartment.

4 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Brandy Lee Feb 9, 2016
    user avatar

    Mary - Wel Smith wanted to gamble with a trial. Which is expensive, time consuming and hard on the family. Anthony was willing to plea. I am sure if Smith had been willing to play ball and Anthony wasn't, the situation would have been reversed.

  • Janene DiPierro Feb 9, 2016
    user avatar

    Anthony got life with NO parole, but really WRAL.... if your going to report, report it right. THEIR WAS NO HEATED EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE POLICE AND SMITH. The police asked him questions and they keep catching him in a lie. Believe it or not... we, the public, are interested and are watching... we don't need you to add drama and bs to get more people to watch.

  • Mary Meadows Feb 8, 2016
    user avatar

    Isn't Anthony the actual killer? So he got a plea bargain to get life w/parole and Smith could get death penalty? I have a problem with that - I don't believe they should have offered Anthony that deal - they should have offered it to Smith instead - or went after both for death penalty. The actual perpetrator should not get a lighter sentence in my opinion.

  • Tyrone Biggum Feb 8, 2016
    user avatar

    It's too bad we can't terrorize and torture these monsters the same way they terrorized and tortured the victim. The death penalty is too lenient in cases like this. They stole that little girl's mother and deserve to live in fear and torment every single day for the rest of their lives. Disgusting.