Judges reject challenge to new NC congressional map

Posted June 2, 2016
Updated June 3, 2016

— A panel of three federal judges on Thursday rejected complaints over a new congressional district map that state lawmakers drew in February after the judges ruled the previous map was unconstitutional.

The latest ruling means the new map will be in place for next Tuesday's congressional primary.

After the judges said lawmakers relied too much on the race of potential voters when they drew the boundaries of two of North Carolina's 13 U.S. House districts in 2011, lawmakers created new maps that completely ignored race and focused on party affiliation and voting patterns, as well as not splitting counties between districts.

Lawyers for the three voters who sued over the 2011 map argued that the "partisan gerrymander" in the new map was similarly unconstitutional.

"Following today's decision by the Middle District of North Carolina, we continue to urge voters to get out and vote on primary day," said State Board of Elections Executive Director Kim Strach.

The judges said they don't like the idea of such gerrymandering, but that "the Court's hands appear to be tied" by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in a similar case that found "no judicially discernible and manageable standards" for handling such maneuvers. They also noted that the plaintiffs didn't provide a standard they might apply in the case, so they had to deny the objection to the new map.

"The Court's denial of the plaintiffs' objections does not constitute or imply an endorsement of, or foreclose any additional challenges to, the Contingent Congressional Plan," the judges wrote in the eight-page opinion.

"We are pleased to see that once again our maps have been upheld as fair, legal and constitutional," Sen. Bob Rucho, R-Mecklenburg, and Rep. David Lewis, R-Harnett, the leaders of the General Assembly's redistricting effort, said in a statement. "North Carolinians will now have the chance to have their votes counted with confidence during the June 7th congressional primary."

Irving Joyner, an attorney for the North Carolina chapter of the NAACP, said the judges may have helped move the argument to a bigger stage.

"How far can a legislative body go in creating a partisan advantage, where you look for, as a matter of fundamental rights, some fairness in the election progress?" Joyner said.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Stacie Hagwood Jun 4, 2016
    user avatar

    Legal and Consititutional? Maybe. Fair? Never. No matter who is in power.

  • Horace Tate Jun 4, 2016
    user avatar

    I'm so glad I have my old rep again. The way the lines were redrawn was ridiculous and so blatantly discriminatory.

  • Perry Masonjar Jun 3, 2016
    user avatar

    Just a case of sore losers by the Dems. the majority party always re-draw the map to their benefit. But as we are now seeing the minority opinion
    tries to get their way in court and waste taxpayer's money. The problem Pete is the populace is now represented, it just does not share your viewpoint.

  • Pete Muller Jun 3, 2016
    user avatar

    It is a dis service to democracy that gerrymandering is applied to the extend that the populace is grossly misrepresented as we currently have in NC.

  • Raleigh Rose Jun 3, 2016
    user avatar

    The judges didn't say the map was fair or htat they endorsed it. They simply do not have standards by which to handle the maneuvers of the NCGA. The maps are clearly partisan and show a need to have a third party that is neutral draw voter maps. This marginalizes the voice and vote of the people.

  • Phillip Mozingo Jun 3, 2016
    user avatar

    I have come to believe that no matter how districts are drawn and re-drawn, the NAACP will always find a way into court. This is one racist group in itself. They have cost the taxpayers so much money in litigation over the past 40 years that it's not funny anymore.