Local News

Judge again OKs evidence for fatal I-85 crash trial

Posted September 29, 2016

Chandler Michael Kania sits in an Orange County courtroom during a Sept. 23, 2016, pre-trial hearing. He is accused of killing three people in a July 2015 crash on Interstate 85.

— A judge ruled Thursday that blood-alcohol and cellphone evidence can be introduced in the trial of a former University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill student accused of killing three people a year ago in a wrong-way collision on Interstate 85.

Authorities said Chandler Michael Kania was driving north in the southbound lanes near the split of I-85 and Interstate 40 in Orange County on July 19, 2015, when his Jeep Wrangler collided with a Suzuki driven by Felecia Harris.

Harris, 49, of Charlotte, her friend Darlene McGee, 46, of Charlotte, and Harris' granddaughter Jahnice Beard, 6, of Brooklyn, N.Y., were killed in the fiery wreck. Harris' daughter, Jahnia King, 9, was seriously injured.

Kania's trial on charges of second-degree murder, felony death by motor vehicle, felony serious injury by motor vehicle, driving while impaired, driving left of center, obtaining alcohol by a minor and underage consumption of alcohol is set to begin next week.

Defense attorneys have tried twice to exclude evidence of Kania's blood-alcohol content after the crash and information authorities gleaned from his iPhone.

Toxicology tests show that Kania had a blood-alcohol content of 0.17, which is more than twice the level at which a driver is considered impaired under North Carolina law. Because Kania was 20 at the time, however, any alcohol in his system would have been illegal because he was underage.

Kania's attorneys alleged that he was too injured to consent to a blood draw in an ambulance after the crash, so his blood was taken illegally and any analysis of it should be excluded from the trial.

Likewise, they said Kania's phone was illegally seized and the State Highway Patrol troopers didn't provide enough justification for a search warrant to examine it.

Investigators say hundreds of images were taken from the phone. According to prosecutors, Kania's friends fought with him prior to the crash and, in an attempt to keep him from driving, they took his phone.

Superior Court Judge Allen Baddour ruled against both defense motions.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Betsey Duggins Sep 29, 2016
    user avatar

    Just because you are monetarily privileged does not make you above the law. Judge is correct in his motion.

  • Byrd Ferguson Sep 29, 2016
    user avatar

    Hey rich boy, you don't got enough money to buy your way out of this one. Meet your new cellmate, Chip.

  • Mary Meadows Sep 29, 2016
    user avatar

    He has good attorneys - the best that money can buy The problem is that he is so darn guilty they are grasping at straws to justify the large retainer.

  • Aiden Audric Sep 29, 2016
    user avatar

    Blood: implied consent laws. You get on the road drunk and appear to be drunk, you get your blood taken because your consent is wrapped in your agreeing to obey the law and not drive drunk.

    Friends stated he fought with people before driving off wasted, his phone remaining behind. Seems reasonable that his phone would help fill in information about what happened before he drove off. Selfies of his drinking - things of that nature.

    Just Baddour ruled rationally. A child in kindergarten would have ruled the same way - these are no-brainer and on the side of the law.

    I'm thinking Kania's attorneys aren't going to serve him very well if that's the best they could come up with so far.