Opinion

Opinion

Inside the GOP creation of the N.C. voting bill dubbed the 'monster' law

Posted September 7

This is a shot of the entrance area to the N.C. Legislative Building.

By William Wan
The Washington Post

RALEIGH, N.C. — The emails to the North Carolina election board seemed routine at the time.

“Is there any way to get a breakdown of the 2008 voter turnout, by race (white and black) and type of vote (early and Election Day)?” a staffer for the state’s Republican-controlled legislature asked in January 2012.

“Is there no category for ‘Hispanic’ voter?” a GOP lawmaker asked in March 2013 after requesting a range of data, including how many voters cast ballots outside their precinct.

And in April 2013, a top aide to the Republican House speaker asked for “a breakdown, by race, of those registered voters in your database that do not have a driver’s license number.”

Months later, the North Carolina legislature passed a law that cut a week of early voting, eliminated out-of-precinct voting and required voters to show specific types of photo ID — restrictions that election board data demonstrated would disproportionately affect African Americans and other minorities.

Critics dubbed it the “monster” law — a sprawling measure that stitched together various voting restrictions being tested in other states. As civil rights groups have sued to block the North Carolina law and others like it around the country, several thousand pages of documents have been produced under court order, revealing the details of how Republicans crafted these measures.

READ MORE

1 Comment

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Aiden Audric Sep 8, 1:09 p.m.
    user avatar

    It's clear, and well-established, what their motivations for the law were.

    The question you have to ask yourself: regardless of political leanings, do you want your government trying to disenfranchise voters, or do you want them trying to guarantee that it is one person, one vote?

    Federal voting IDs issued automatically at 18, with a passport-like vetting process, would be a good fix. Neither major political party supports that idea, though...