@NCCapitol

McCrory blasts Obama administration reversal on Atlantic drilling

Posted March 15

Offshore drilling generic

— In a major reversal, the Obama administration said Tuesday it will bar oil drilling off America's Atlantic Coast, a move cheered by environmentalists and consistent with the president's aggressive steps to combat climate change.

North Carolina leaders quickly criticized the move, predicting it would cost the state thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in oil revenue.

"President Obama’s total reversal can only be described as a special political favor to far-left activists that have no problem importing energy resources from countries hostile to the United States," Gov. Pat McCrory said in a statement. "What’s more troubling is the President is closing the door before he even knows what resources can be harnessed in an environmentally sound way."

Republican U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis said he was extremely disappointed by the decision, which he said effectively ends debate over offshore drilling before it even starts.

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said the decision "protects the Atlantic for future generations." She said the administration had listened to thousands of people in coastal communities from Florida to New England who said, "Now is not the time to start leasing off the Atlantic Coast."

However, business groups and most Republicans criticized it as another example of what they call executive overreach.

Despite a surge in oil and natural gas production in the past seven years that has helped push gasoline prices below $2 a gallon, Republicans and industry groups have criticized Obama for imposing what they say are unnecessary regulations on drilling, especially on federal lands. Most of the drilling boom has occurred on state and private lands and in the Gulf of Mexico, long the center of U.S. offshore oil production.

The decision reverses a proposal made last year in which the administration floated a plan that would have opened up a broad swath of the Atlantic Coast to drilling. That January 2015 proposal would have opened up sites more than 50 miles off Virginia, North and South Carolina and Georgia to oil drilling no earlier than 2021.

President Barack Obama, in his final year in office, is working to build an environmental legacy that includes a global agreement to curb climate change and an ambitious plan to reduce carbon pollution from coal-fired power plants. Obama also has imposed stricter limits on smog-causing pollution linked to asthma and has rejected the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada.

The proposal on Atlantic drilling is likely to become an issue in the 2016 presidential campaign. Both Democratic candidates oppose it, while Republicans vow to expand drilling.

The plan announced Tuesday covers potential lease sales from 2017 to 2022 and calls for leasing 10 areas in the Gulf and three off the Alaska coast.

A coalition of groups that oppose Atlantic drilling had organized protests and petitions in southeastern and mid-Atlantic states, often running into opposition from governors and other political leaders. Republican governors in North and South Carolina back drilling off their states' coasts, as does the Democratic governor of Virginia. The state's two Democratic senators also support drilling.

"President Obama has taken a giant step for our oceans, for coastal economies and for mitigating climate change," said Jacqueline Savitz, vice president of Oceana, an environmental group. "This is a victory for people over politics and shows the importance of old-fashioned grass-roots organizing."

Democratic 4th District Congressman David Price called offshore drilling an "ill-advised proposal" and said the decision to abandon it is a victory for North Carolina's coastal communities, a number of which took official stances against drilling.

The National Ocean Industries Association called the reversal "mind-boggling" and an effort to appease a vocal minority.

"It is difficult to put into words how wrong and anti-energy this decision is," NOIA President Randall Luthi said in a statement. "By not taking the long-term view, the administration sells U.S. consumers short. Instead, they have determined they are content to let the rest of world lead in Atlantic offshore oil and natural gas development. This is the wrong direction in efforts to continue the U.S. march towards energy independence."

The oil and gas industry has pushed for Atlantic drilling and pledged that exploration would be done safely, with lessons applied from the 2010 BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Tuesday's decision "appeases extremists who seek to stop oil and natural gas production" in the U.S., said Jack Gerard, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, the nation's largest oil and gas lobbying group. The plan will increase energy costs for Americans and close the door for years on efforts to create new jobs and boost energy security, he said.

The Defense Department has said Atlantic offshore drilling could hurt military maneuvers and interfere with missile tests the Navy relies on to protect the East Coast. The Pentagon submitted a report to Interior that identified locations in Virginia and other states where military readiness programs would conflict with oil and gas activities, said spokesman Matthew Allen.

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., who supports offshore drilling, said he was surprised at the Pentagon's objections, which were not raised when the draft proposal was submitted last year.

The Pentagon "has been relatively quiet during this public debate and has never shared their objections with me before," said Kaine, a former Virginia governor who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Obama found an unlikely ally in Rep. Mark Sanford, R-S.C., a former governor who opposes Atlantic drilling and led a bipartisan effort to stop it.

"This is fantastic news for the coast of South Carolina," Sanford said. "Residents along our coast should be proud of the way they united on this issue and sent a compelling message to Washington."

Rep. Tom Rice, R-S.C. whose district includes Myrtle Beach, the heart of the state's $19 billion tourism industry, said the decision was not surprising.

"As more and more recoverable oil has been located onshore due to advancing technology" such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, "tapping new reserves in the Atlantic has become less and less feasible," Rice said.

The Interior Department estimates there are about 2.8 billion barrels of recoverable oil on the Atlantic's outer continental shelf and 26.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Energy industry experts say the reserves may be far greater.

15 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Bob Bruck Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    BAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  • Jeff Herring Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    McCrory put all his eggs in the basket of oil. he passed laws to kill healthcare jobs (refusing to expand medicaid), killed solar jobs (killed tax credit), and has done nothing to stimulate the economy, meanwhile he says oil and tax cuts for the rich will cure all ills, while undercutting the middle class (cutting unemployment benefits raising sales taxes). What a fool. The chickens are coming home to roost. Make him a one-termer and replace the hidebound GOP legislature. They call a special session about bathrooms, WHERE ARE THE SPECIAL SESSIONS ABOUT JOBS .

  • Fanny Chmelar Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread



    This is one ,"Dave McCabe". It exists. It's actually a real thing. I had to sign in and everything!!

  • David McCabe Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    Yashi, when are you going to get an actual facebook page?

  • Johnathan Gault Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    Which Trump will over turn:)

  • Fanny Chmelar Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread



    I did not Blame anything on Bush.

    I did the homework by not posting a single link - I understand how this law has been impacting decisions across 2 administrations and thought I'd give you some insight instead of a link-bombing.

  • Maurice Pentico Jr. Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    LOL.... still blame it all on Bush.
    Lets see you do your homework...

  • Fanny Chmelar Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread



    If one handed in a bunch of links to their teacher and said, "here, I did the homework you asked for!" they'd be laughed down to the principal's office with an F.

    This all started with the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Nutshell: legislation that provided incentives to produce American energy, either by traditional drilling or establishing new power plants. Only large corporation (read: old) had established credit histories to take advantage of it.
    Small and nascent companies (solar) did not have the track record to get loans, so this legislation remained mostly for big oil.

    Then in 2009 Obama's administration agreed to take on more loan risk in order to advance smaller companies with newer technologies. Applications took off. Some companies failed because of Obama roadblocks or were just bad to start with, and some succeeded because they were sound investments to start with.

    Obama expanded on something great and our energy sector shows it.

  • Paul Hayeze Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    Maurice "And the list goes on and on and on"....Yup, all those conservative publications.

  • Larry Price Mar 15, 2016
    user avatar

    looks like Obama is finally learning how to do his job

More...