House roundup: Pension, guns, religion bills pass

Posted June 18, 2014
Updated April 25

— House lawmakers gave final approval Wednesday to a handful of bills. The following are among the most notable:

Senate Bill 226: This measure repeals a 1935 firearms law that has applied only to Durham County.

Rep. Mickey Michaux, D-Durham, described the current law as "a very odd situation."

Under what amounts to a blue law, Durham County residents have 10 days from the purchase of a pistol, handgun or certain other types of weapons to register it with the clerk of Superior Court. The clerk does not digitize those records or make them available in any other format than paper files kept in filing cabinets.

No other county in the state has a similar registration requirement.

The repeal measure passed the House on a pair of voice votes. It has already passed the Senate. Because it applies to only one county, the governor does not have to sign it, so it will become law.

Senate Bill 719: Student organizations at public universities and community colleges would be able to oust leaders who don’t share the groups’ core beliefs under a bill that cleared the House.

"I would suggest that, in our society, political correctness has run amok," Rep. Bert Jones, R-Rockingham, told his colleagues.

In particular, the bill ensures that religious groups can demand that members share their faith in order to serve as leaders.

Opponents of the bill argued that lawmakers were blocking the UNC Board of Governors from setting policy for the system.

The measure passed 78-37. It must return to the Senate for final legislative approval.

House Bill 1195: This bill addresses "pension spiking," the practice of pumping up a public official's salary at the end of his or her career in order to earn a bigger retirement payment from the state pension plan.

A public official's pension is based on a calculation that involves an average of the final years in public service. They can increase or "spike" their monthly pension payments by increasing their salary in the years leading up to retirement. The practice is costly to the state because the worker in question will not have paid enough money into the retirement system over his career to offset the increased costs.

This bill doesn't outlaw the practice, but it requires that either the individual or their public employer reimburse the state retirement system for the increased cost.

The measure, which passed 115-0, will now be reviewed by the Senate.


This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Matt Wood Jun 19, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    You really want to make the claim that all have failed? Are you the final authority on it? One need only google "successful gun control policy" to see you're categorically WRONG. It can work, if people like you would stop clinging to your tools of death.

  • Alan Baker Jun 19, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    You do realize one doesn't need to be "Left" to think there's such a thing as a sensible gun law, correct? One doesn't even need to be to be embarrassed by those who can't recognize that necessity. I say this as a lifetime gun owner and enthusiast: your gloating isn't doing us any good.

  • Chip Dipson Jun 19, 2014
    user avatar

    I got two guns, and they're only concealed by my sleeves.

  • deathandtaxes Jun 19, 2014

    View quoted thread

    If a gun makes u a tough guy, then u got bigger problems.