Raleigh, N.C. — The Wake County Mayor's Association spoke out Monday against a bill that would limit city and town leaders' authority to control home appearance and design.
Rolesville Mayor Frank Eagles called the measure – House Bill 150, which was approved last week in committee and sent to the House floor – a "dire emergency."
Raleigh Mayor Nancy McFarlane said it could lead to incompatible development and hurt property values.
"To open up what can be built next door to almost anything, it is kind of frightening to people," she said.
McFarlane said last week that Raleigh has developed zoning regulations in response to community requests, with the overarching goals of continued growth and providing affordable housing. The city wants to control things like the placement of bedrooms and bathrooms within homes, she said, to ensure rooming houses don't sprout up in single-family neighborhoods.
She added Monday that the bill would also void parts of recently approved building guidelines that included citizen and developer input.
"This bill is in direct conflict with that," McFarlane said. "It really takes away the power of citizens."
Rep. Nelson Dollar, R-Wake, who is a sponsor of the bill, said it's important for homeowners to have some say in the design of their homes.
The North Carolina Home Builders Association and the North Carolina Association of Realtors agree.
"There are definitely benefits to having a neighborhood look a certain way, but our contention is it is up to those homeowners," said Cady Thomas, spokeswoman for the realtors' association.
Those who support the bill also point out that it does not take away power from homeowners associations or historic districts.
Home Builders Association spokeswoman Lisa Martin said some local leaders go too far in controlling home appearances.
"There is no public purpose to it. It costs a lot of money," Martin said. "It can price people out of the housing market and get rid of their opportunity to own their own home."
Eagles, however, said his town – which has grown nearly 330 percent in the last six years – is attracting home buyers and doesn't need to change its rules.
"What I would say to legislators is, 'What are we doing wrong?'" he said. "Seems like we are doing something right."



![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2010/08/30/8212390/8362364-1286459151-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2007/07/30/1649447/1649447-1209833775-100x75.jpg)







WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
March 19, 2013 5:50 p.m.
March 19, 2013 3:44 p.m.
My point exactly! First of all, the "build out" started in the late 1960's, not post 1993. How do I know? I was born in Raleigh. You can thank developers and homebuilders contributing to polical campaigns and using the influence to oppose zoning regulations and impact fees for the hodge-podge development and for building beyond infrastructure capacity, then refusing to help pay for infrastructure upgrades and new schools. Much of the cost of infrastructure and schools has been borne by property owners of Wake County. This bill is designed to line the pockets of those same developers and homebuilders. Personally, I am tired of subsidizing their profits.
March 19, 2013 2:49 p.m.
Well, today, section 8 housing and most all apartments have low income units. The projects have already been spread around and many are torn down. The crime rates have done down, but other things have been spread around.
March 19, 2013 2:46 p.m.
Which Texas cities? example please of how well this is working.....
March 19, 2013 2:45 p.m.
March 19, 2013 2:44 p.m.
March 19, 2013 2:33 p.m.
March 19, 2013 2:31 p.m.
this is city and towns. basically its saying that now a developer can build you a shoddy house, but the HOA can still tell you what color to paint it.
having said that, it is RIDICULOUS for the these legislators to try and control cities and towns while screaming about states rights.
hypocrites.
March 19, 2013 2:26 p.m.
They tried that in the '90s. Low-income housing projects inserted into middle class neighborhoods. The crime rate went up.
March 19, 2013 12:59 p.m.