Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

8:07 p.m. • 5-22-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 74° F
  • Sat: Clear.
    • Hi: 72° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2013-01-10 23:28:00
Updated: 2013-01-11 05:56:00

Harnett leaders delay vote on fate of shooting range


Drake Landing
Drake Landing
print friendly

After two lengthy meetings to determine whether a Harnett County shooting range should be stripped of its agritourism status, the county Board of Adjustment has delayed its decision for two more weeks.

The board will meet again on Jan. 23 to resume testimony that will decide the fate of Drake Landing, a family-owned farm in Fuquay-Varina with a shooting range that has been at the center of controversy for more than a year because neighbors say the gunfire is noisy and poses a safety hazard.

No one has been injured at the range, but the Harnett County Sheriff's Office reports there have been at least five cases of stray bullets hitting cars and homes in the area. It's unclear, though, if any or all of the those bullets were fired from Drake Landing.

The shooting range falls under the state's agritourism classification, which means it isn't subject to county zoning laws. It was approved as an agritourism destination because the shooting range prepared hunters for use of Drake Landing's hunting preserve, county leaders said.

A Drake Landing attorney said it qualifies as agritourism and that neighbors' complaints don't change that.

If county leaders decide to strip its agritourism designation, however, the shooting range could be subject to more rules and restrictions or could be forced to close entirely.

A county zoning inspector said during Thursday's meeting that it's unclear what would happen, because there haven't been many disputes of this type in North Carolina to set a precedent.

Drake Landing customers want to see the shooting range survive and say it's a great place to practice safe shooting techniques.

"Where else are you going to have for people to do responsible practice shooting?" said Sue Allen. "I don't hear excessive noise. It is not like a firing range."

But neighbors say it's a nuisance.

"It goes on continuously – all the time," said Lynwood Hare, who lives about a half-mile from the shooting range. "Somebody is going to be shot, hit or killed before it's all over with."

Hare said he's lived in his home since the 1970s, decades before Drake Landing opened.

The owner of Drake Landing, former county commissioner Dan Andrews, declined to comment.


59 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 59 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
NO GUN CHANGES UNTIL Posse Comitatus IS RESTORED! This is the 1835 law that says the us military can not arrest us citizens. They can now.

"we are talking about two separate ordinances." - Paul Parker

Oh, I thought you were talking about that James Whitlock dude. Sorry.

"It is up to an LEO. Apparently some people do not trust a trained LEO to determine if someone is responsibly shooting or just trying to annoy the people around them." - Damien Thorne

I generally trust cops, but enforcement of certain laws is still subjective. They don't always know the law, and some can be downright anti-gun when it comes to civilians. There's plenty of youtube video showing cops hassling people exercising their 2nd amendment rights.

"I think the complaint voiced by the pro-gun people was this line:

"any unreasonably loud or disturbing noise in the county is prohibited and unlawful"

Anti-gun people often consider any type of gunshot to be "unreasonably loud or disturbing". Taken out of context, that kind of ordinance sounds reasonable. But remember it was specifically considered because of a particular guy that neighbors claimed was shooting all the time, in close proximity to houses." Lightfoot3

Most people understand that it is not up to the person complaining about the noise to make that decision. It is up to an LEO. Apparently some people do not trust a trained LEO to determine if someone is responsibly shooting or just trying to annoy the people around them.

I think the complaint voiced by the pro-gun people was this line:

"any unreasonably loud or disturbing noise in the county is prohibited and unlawful" Lightfoot3 January 11, 2013 2:37 p.m.

Lightfoot3, we are talking about two separate ordinances. Please go back and read my post at 2:11pm that you quoted from. I SPECIFICALLY referenced Sec.16-3 ( you can find it at: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/North%20Carolina/johnstoncounty_nc/codeofordinancescountyofjohnstonnorthcar?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:johnstoncounty_nc ). Sec. 16-3 says absolutely nothing about "any unreasonably loud or disturbing noise in the county is prohibited and unlawful".

"Posted below is the ordinance that Lightfoot3 says restricts his ability to shoot on his property." - Ashen-Shugar

Uh, no, I didn't specify which ordinance, only that there are ordinances that give restrictions. In Wake county for example, we have a 100yard from dwellings or livestock rule. On my street, we have lots from about .5 to .8 acres. Behind us is nothing but swamp, woods, etc. I can't shoot .22short low velocity (i.e. pretty quite rounds) any time, any day, in my backyard unless I have written permission from about 6 different houses. Some are anti-gun, so it ain't gonna happen.

View Comments VIEW ALL 59 COMMENTS