banner
@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

Groups say repealing Jordan Lake Rules makes no sense

Posted May 24, 2013

— Before crowds descend on Jordan Lake to swim, boat and fish over the Memorial Day weekend, environment groups held a news conference Friday to express concern over legislation that would repeal water-quality rules for the lake.

Environment North Carolina, the Sierra Club, the Haw River Assembly and local businesspeople said they are puzzled by the Senate's passage last week of a bill that would scrap the Jordan Lake Rules, which were adopted in 2009 to cut pollution and runoff flowing into the lake from upstream sources by 35 percent. The lake is a drinking water source for about 300,000 people in the Triangle.

Republican sponsors say the rules aren't working, so the state should start over with new environmental regulations.

"To really do this right, we need to clean the slate and come back with new technology, new proposals," said Sen. Rick Gunn, R-Alamance.

Gunn said the rules have hindered economic development in his hometown of Burlington and other cities where they apply.

"We cannot take the same piece of property in the counties that are part of Jordan Lake and put the same amount of improvements on there," he said.

Jordan Lake Water quality of Jordan Lake needs protection, groups say

Chatham County Commissioner Sally Kost said the legislation is "definitely about development. It's about money." She argues that the rules haven't been allowed to take effect yet and need to remain in place.

"If North Carolina is serious about protecting our water quality, they need to show Chatham County and the people who drink this water and play in it that they're serious," Kost said, noting that clean water in Jordan Lake produces tourism dollars and jobs for the area.

"Let's not start over. Time is of the essence here. The lake is not cleaning up itself. It's only getting worse," she said.

Jordan Lake has always had problems with pollution because it's fed by urban streams and small tributaries that pick up a lot of fertilizer, sediment and toxins. The pollution has caused algae blooms and fish kills and has forced the closure of some of the lake's beaches in recent years.

“The Senate’s vote to repeal the Jordan Lake Rules is a slap in the face to all of us who care about the quality of the lake’s water for people who drink it, fish, swim and play in it," Elaine Chiosso, Haw Riverkeeper, said in a statement. "Dirty water gets to the lake from dirty creeks, and all the major streams running through our cities, including Greensboro, Burlington and Durham, are on the same federal impaired waters list as Jordan Lake."

The state Department of Environment and Natural Resources doesn't support the repeal of the rules, saying that could violate federal clean water standards and lead to even stricter regulations.

Environmental advocates said they hope to stop the bill in the House.

"I hope that our friends in the General Assembly take this to heart: Please leave Jordan Lake better than when you found it. Do not pass Senate Bill 515," Morrisville Town Councilman Mark Stohlman said. "Not only is it a recreational facility for the citizens of Morrisville, but it's also the drinking water for Apex, Cary and the (Research Triangle Park)."

75 Comments

This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Krimson May 28, 2013

    I would laugh at the GOP for being so stupid and short-sighted, but instead I cry for Jordan Lake and for ourselves...

  • Bendal1 May 28, 2013

    This crop of conservatives in the legislature have to be the most self-serving, morally corrupt group that have ever taken office in this state.

  • oldtomhorn May 26, 2013

    It certainly doesn't make sense to the people who have to get their drinking water from the lake, however it makes perfect sense to the lobbyist for those who are polluting it and for those who receive rewards for it's passage. After all the most importanat consuderation for a politician is raising campaign funds.

  • dumbhick May 26, 2013

    Having grown up knowing Rick Gunn it is still hard to accept the title Senator. What is not hard accept are his views on this issue.

  • dumbhick May 26, 2013

    Rick Gunn, R-Alamance - Successful realtor(who happened to be a good man) passed on his business & connections to a spoiled son.
    Surprize surprize, a realtor wants to remove environmental restrictions which affect property value and availability.

    Hope the NC voters pull their heads out of their keisters and toss this bunch of in-it-for-themselves "legislators" out on their ears next election ...... They are giving a whole new meaning to "transparency in government". It would be hard NOT to see their motivation.

  • jackjones2nc May 25, 2013

    The NC Republican agenda clearly disregards NC citizens and long term success. NC Republicans are legislating quick-money schemes for unaccountable corporations.

  • rogue_woman May 25, 2013

    You people don't get it. The Jordan Lake Rules place limits on the nutrients that can be released by municipal waste water treatment plants. The limits are strict, and municipalities have been upgrading plants for years to meet these limits. What will happen if they yank the rules is the EPA WILL step in and take over, implementing limits that are nearly impossible to meet, costing the rate payers (YOU) an absolute fortune. The EPA will NOT let us just have nothing in place. Are you ready for the federal government to intervene?

  • Let-it-be-said May 25, 2013

    I usually hate it when people bash republicans for making this a better state. However in this case geosol may be correct.

  • uragoner2 May 25, 2013

    Clearly a sign of corruption. Having seen the disastrous results of water pollution from living in Md. and witnessing the horrors of the inner harbor ,this story is truly frightening.

  • JayJay May 24, 2013

    Developers have been trying to develop high end properties around Jordan for years. Now that their republican buddies are in control they'll have clear sailing. NC residents got what they deserved when they voted the republicans in.

More...