Raleigh, N.C. — Gov. Pat McCrory says he will sign an unemployment overhaul that will cut off emergency benefits for some 80,000 jobless North Carolinians.
"I will not support the extension of unemployment beyond July of this year," McCrory told a meeting of the Tobacco Growers Association of North Carolina. "I think we need to now draw the line."
The proposal would change North Carolina's unemployment system in order to pay down a debt of $2.5 billion, racked up during the recession when state unemployment taxes didn't keep up with jobless claims. It would raise taxes slightly on employers, while making steep cuts to the amount, duration and access to benefits for laid-off workers.
If the bill takes effect July 1 as written, it will trigger a provision in the "fiscal cliff" bill that governs federal emergency extended unemployment benefits.
Because North Carolina's quarterly unemployment rate is still higher than 9 percent, long-term unemployed workers here are eligible for the federally-funded benefits.
At present, about 81,000 people are receiving those benefits, which bring about $100 million into the state's economy every month.
But if lawmakers cut the state's unemployment benefits, jobless workers here will lose their eligibility for federal assistance. Their checks will stop when the state overhaul takes effect.
Despite that impact, House and Senate leaders say they won't delay the overhaul. McCrory said he won't delay it, either.
"I refuse to let us continue to live off of a credit card. We're going to pay off the credit card. We're going to change the rules and policies," he said.
"The current status quo of how we've done unemployment has not put more people on the payroll of private-sector jobs. It's put more people on the government payrolls of unemployment," he said. "We can no longer afford to do that in North Carolina. We are changing our policy now, and that will be one of the first bills I sign."
House Speaker Thom Tillis says he expects the overhaul bill will win final House approval Tuesday. It then goes to the Senate, where President Pro Tem Phil Berger says it has strong support. It could be on the governor's desk by next weekend.



![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2010/08/30/8212390/8362364-1286459151-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2007/07/30/1649447/1649447-1209833775-100x75.jpg)









WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This blog post is closed for comments.
In the long run more jobs will be lost. As more and more lose jobs, those with jobs will have to compete with those willing to work for peanuts.
Cheer all you want but its a bad move for everyone.
February 1, 2013 5:10 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:10 p.m.
Where are the jobs Pat. Bring back the jobs and unemployment will take care of it self. Only governor for a month and already an epic failure. Guess he joins good company since the Republican failures in the legislature have had two years to bring back the jobs yet NC is still among the leaders of unemployed in the country. Perhaps a little less rhetoric and more positive action is what is needed.
Lets join together and make sure Pat McCrory is a one term governor. Replacing failed leadership with an even bigger failure is not the change we need.
February 1, 2013 5:10 p.m.
That said, the cost is taken out of the workers pockets, not the businesses that enjoyed the lower UE rate in the 90's. Gov McC, I voted for you and I will watch to see how many govt emps, esp at DHHS, are fired for poor performance. Not "allowed to step down", FIRED. That's from the chief, to the middle mgr who signed off on the CSC contracts, on down to the gossip girl.
Maybe the ESC ship has sailed, but the DHHS/Medicaid one hasn't. No excuses this time.
February 1, 2013 5:10 p.m.
So how long should a person be able to collect unemployment benefits, forever? They have six months to get off the couch and find a job. That's not too much to ask. I wish I had six months to sit around boo hooing and collecting unearned paychecks. Good job Pat! Keep up the good work!
February 1, 2013 5:12 p.m.
Not until the government finds a way to recoup the FOURTEEN MILLION JOBS left from being liquidated by companies between 2006/8.
That leaves FOURTEEN MILLION LESS JOBS to even apply for in the job market.
Where are those FOURTEEN MILLION PEOPLE going to work?
February 1, 2013 5:12 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:12 p.m.
Yes. But that's not what the controversy is over.
February 1, 2013 5:12 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:13 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:13 p.m.
It isn't pride, it's FOURTEEN MILLION LESS JOBS available in the job market.
The government needs to work on bringing jobs back from overseas and it needs to get rid of anyone doing a job that's not suppose to be in this country in the first place.
February 1, 2013 5:13 p.m.
Yes, that was proven in the November re-election of First Citizen.
Unfortunately, today, people vote for what they can get at other's expense. The takers seek to assure their supply.
As Mitt Romney said, Obama knows how to promise gifts to get votes. Sad but true...
February 1, 2013 5:14 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:15 p.m.
AMEN!!!
And may those making those statements soon find themselves in the same predicament.
Then they'll come to know first-hand what it's like to spend hours a day searching job boards, sending out application/resume after application/resume, with nary a reply because FOURTEEN MILLION OTHER PEOPLE are looking for jobs too.
February 1, 2013 5:16 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:17 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:17 p.m.
And those "pays less than my unemployment" jobs will create longer lines at the welfare/food stamp offices.
So how are we ahead then?
At least EMPLOYERS pay for unemployment compensation.
WE TAXPAYERS pay for welfare and food stamps.
February 1, 2013 5:17 p.m.
May you lose your job soon, then you'll find out how silly that statement was.
There are FOURTEEN MILLION LESS JOBS in the US now than there were in 2006.
Where are those FOURTEEN MILLION PEOPLE going to find jobs now that those jobs are gone?
February 1, 2013 5:19 p.m.
You didn't pay into it, hopefully, your employers did.
But I understand what you're saying, and I truly feel for you. When I got laid off in 2007, I was of retireable age, and I retired. Many don't have that luxury, and I truly feel sorry for them because I've been there, and I understand.
May those that don't understand and harbor ill feelings towards the unemployed soon find out themselves.
February 1, 2013 5:21 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:22 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:22 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:22 p.m.
Lord God help us.
They aren't being "due to the actions (or inaction!) of those who choose to live off the system."
They're being punished because those at the NC ESC made a HUGE accounting error and borrowed from the Feds to cover that error, a loan which now has to be paid back.
February 1, 2013 5:23 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:25 p.m.
There will always be someone willing to take the place of the worker you "get rid of". Go after the employers making a profit by breaking the law and hiring these guys, and things will change. Look at AZ, TX, OK - that's what did it.
February 1, 2013 5:25 p.m.
Native NC gal"
That's about the most accurate statement that's been made so far. Many who are or have been on unemployment COULD have found employment much sooner. May not be the "perfect" job but enough to get by until the right job came along. Now the system has been pushed past a breaking point and honestly the Govenor has little choice but to try and stop the bleeding before we all go under. Make no mistake, the FEDS WILL GET THEIRS BACK.....
February 1, 2013 5:25 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:25 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:25 p.m.
Amen. Karma has a way of making that happen, whether you believe in it or not.
February 1, 2013 5:26 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:27 p.m.
How so?
State law requires every company that employs 50 or more people to pay Unemployment Insurance premiums.
How does that come out of worker's pockets, except perhaps indirectly?
And yes, for decades, the Democrats lowered those premiums repeatedly, causing an unemployment fund too low to cover the disaster that struck when SEVENTEEN MILLION JOBS were liquidated between 2006/8 (three million of which has been recovered).
The Democrats knew this was going on because an audit clearly pointed out the unemployment fund was too low in the mid 2000s, yet they did nothing about it.
And here we are...
But take heart, NC isn't the only state that was caught with its pants down in this area when millions upon millions of jobs were lost in this country, and throughout the world. Many states were caught in this predicament.
February 1, 2013 5:27 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:28 p.m.
If he could be repealed, he might have to live off his own new unemployment paycheck.
February 1, 2013 5:28 p.m.
On the contrary, they understand that kicking the can down road on out of control spending can't continue indefinitely.
99 weeks of unemployment is still available for those laid off. But don't expect the media to reassure the sheeeple of that.
February 1, 2013 5:29 p.m.
That wasn't directly due to unemployment benefits, that $2.5B was due to an error at the ESC.
February 1, 2013 5:29 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:30 p.m.
How can you tell just by looking at someone that they are on unemployment? How can you tell that they don't work a job other than 9 - 5? You should probably get a job as a mind reader or FBI profiler. Because you are GOOOOD.
February 1, 2013 5:32 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:32 p.m.
They won't hire here -- they will outsource and mccrory will ensure they will pay no taxes as a corp here either ---
February 1, 2013 5:32 p.m.
Because few are doing anything to recoup the FOURTEEN MILLION JOBS LOST IN THIS COUNTRY between 2006/8.
Time for the government to start doing something concrete about that.
In his 2008 campaign speech in Flint, MI, Obama PROMISED to CREATE NEW JOBS.
To date, he not only has CREATED zero, saying it isn't the government's job to create jobs, he hasn't apologized for making that erroneous promise in the first place.
This country desperately needs many areas of its infrastructure repaired/replaced, from old bridges to old water systems to old sewer systems.
How about the government hiring the unemployed to work on those projects? That will get many to work directly and indirectly through peripheral jobs and industries.
February 1, 2013 5:33 p.m.
Me too!!!
And I'm sick of it being done by those who know absolutely nothing about how the unemployment system works.
It makes them look like fools when they do so, because their lack of knowledge of the system is easily apparent.
And if Karma is real, it's looking for them to share the misery of unemployment.
February 1, 2013 5:35 p.m.
The requirement to have E-9s on file for every employee and to verify the information on them through E-Verify will help that, I hope.
The fines for those who don't follow the system or knowingly hire those in this country illegally need to be made HUGE, so HUGE companies won't try to cheat on who they hire.
February 1, 2013 5:38 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:39 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:39 p.m.
In all honesty, it probably has to happen, but I'd like to see it done month at a time and I'd like to see it spread 50/50 between those applying for unemployment and companies within the state, not the 60/40 which is what I think is being presented.
For instance, if those applying for unemployment the first quarter of this year, get only one month less unemployment instead of 12 months less. Then those applying new in the second quarter get 2 months less, and so forth. Then it's gradual and it hurts less.
But it still needs to be split evenly 50/50 between companies and people. PERIOD!!!
February 1, 2013 5:41 p.m.
It wasn't meant to be a "gravy train". It was meant to help you transition to a new job. Even if the new job pays less than what you made before.
The fact that you were struggling while working says a lot about your ability to live within your means. Do you have cable TV? A monthly payment cell phone? Go out to movies/clubs? Have lots of things you could live without? Drink alcohol? Smoke? Could you do with less of a living space or car? Eat less expensive food?
Get the idea? Look into your life and find where to cut out expenses you can get by without.
Billions of people around the world are happy to have a bowl of rice to eat. When was the last, or first, time you had rice for a meal?
I have hundreds of times because it's economical and helps me get by while paying the bills.
Adapt to survive. Economical is the new black. Frugal is the new cool.
February 1, 2013 5:41 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:41 p.m.
Needs to be repeated. EVERYONE should be absolutely screaming about this!!! Arrogant to get rid of those trying and even MORE arrogant to give raises with no work done yet except destroying others lives.
Doesn't matter if the person is Democrat or Republican, they are both the same when it comes to politics against the PEOPLE.
February 1, 2013 5:41 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:41 p.m.
February 1, 2013 5:43 p.m.