Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

3:46 p.m. • 5-24-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Clear.
    • Hi: 72° F
  • Sun: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 75° F
  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 80° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image
@NCCapitol
McCrory
print friendly

McCrory: Emergency benefits will end in July

Published: 2013-02-01 15:47:00
Updated: 2013-02-01 18:49:39

Gov. Pat McCrory says he will sign an unemployment overhaul that will cut off emergency benefits for some 80,000 jobless North Carolinians.

"I will not support the extension of unemployment beyond July of this year," McCrory told a meeting of the Tobacco Growers Association of North Carolina. "I think we need to now draw the line." 

The proposal would change North Carolina's unemployment system in order to pay down a debt of $2.5 billion, racked up during the recession when state unemployment taxes didn't keep up with jobless claims. It would raise taxes slightly on employers, while making steep cuts to the amount, duration and access to benefits for laid-off workers.

If the bill takes effect July 1 as written, it will trigger a provision in the "fiscal cliff" bill that governs federal emergency extended unemployment benefits.

Because North Carolina's quarterly unemployment rate is still higher than 9 percent, long-term unemployed workers here are eligible for the federally-funded benefits.

At present, about 81,000 people are receiving those benefits, which bring about $100 million into the state's economy every month.

But if lawmakers cut the state's unemployment benefits, jobless workers here will lose their eligibility for federal assistance. Their checks will stop when the state overhaul takes effect.

Despite that impact, House and Senate leaders say they won't delay the overhaul. McCrory said he won't delay it, either.

"I refuse to let us continue to live off of a credit card. We're going to pay off the credit card. We're going to change the rules and policies," he said.

"The current status quo of how we've done unemployment has not put more people on the payroll of private-sector jobs. It's put more people on the government payrolls of unemployment," he said. "We can no longer afford to do that in North Carolina. We are changing our policy now, and that will be one of the first bills I sign." 

House Speaker Thom Tillis says he expects the overhaul bill will win final House approval Tuesday. It then goes to the Senate, where President Pro Tem Phil Berger says it has strong support. It could be on the governor's desk by next weekend.

Read More Posts from this Blog

350 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

This blog post is closed for comments.


page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

"looks like your going to have to work for a living now like the rest of us. thank you pat. keep up the good work."

In the long run more jobs will be lost. As more and more lose jobs, those with jobs will have to compete with those willing to work for peanuts.

Cheer all you want but its a bad move for everyone.

Those "pays less than my unemployment" jobs will start to get filled now, and the unemployment rate will finally go down.

Anyone who thought McCrory was going to be a moderate after selling his soul to King Pope to be governor, is either deluded or hasn't been paying attention.

Where are the jobs Pat. Bring back the jobs and unemployment will take care of it self. Only governor for a month and already an epic failure. Guess he joins good company since the Republican failures in the legislature have had two years to bring back the jobs yet NC is still among the leaders of unemployed in the country. Perhaps a little less rhetoric and more positive action is what is needed.

Lets join together and make sure Pat McCrory is a one term governor. Replacing failed leadership with an even bigger failure is not the change we need.

UE was never meant to last forever. Your job can be gone in a heartbeat too. You have several months' notice now to figure out a plan, which is more than most workers get.

That said, the cost is taken out of the workers pockets, not the businesses that enjoyed the lower UE rate in the 90's. Gov McC, I voted for you and I will watch to see how many govt emps, esp at DHHS, are fired for poor performance. Not "allowed to step down", FIRED. That's from the chief, to the middle mgr who signed off on the CSC contracts, on down to the gossip girl.

Maybe the ESC ship has sailed, but the DHHS/Medicaid one hasn't. No excuses this time.

That's what happens when you put a republican in the governor's chair, 81,000 out work, in july another 50,000 homeless.

So how long should a person be able to collect unemployment benefits, forever? They have six months to get off the couch and find a job. That's not too much to ask. I wish I had six months to sit around boo hooing and collecting unearned paychecks. Good job Pat! Keep up the good work!

Raleigh Rocks 1 - "Folks, 99 weeks of benefits is enough...dont ya think?"

Not until the government finds a way to recoup the FOURTEEN MILLION JOBS left from being liquidated by companies between 2006/8.

That leaves FOURTEEN MILLION LESS JOBS to even apply for in the job market.

Where are those FOURTEEN MILLION PEOPLE going to work?

rwest134 you cannot get unemployment if you quit your job. Companies are laying off more then hiring.

"Folks, 99 weeks of benefits is enough...dont ya think?"

Yes. But that's not what the controversy is over.

It's too bad the people who are truly looking for jobs and can't find them must be punished due to the actions (or inaction!) of those who choose to live off the system.

If you're calling unemployment benefits a "gravy train", you've never had to live off of it. I paid into it for over twenty years and never collected a penny. I get laid off, clearly my choice according to the opinion of some, and have to live off 1/3 less than what I was struggling to live on before and people call it a "gravy train"? Get real! Unemployment goes up again, but it's just as easy as "get a job". Some people really need to come down off their cloud.

mep - "Incentive to keep your job... now get back to work! If you dont have a job, and your 26 weeks of unemployment have run out... then either take that job you have been passing up because it does not pay very well, or its beneath you.... or welcome to welfare. Check your pride at the door."

It isn't pride, it's FOURTEEN MILLION LESS JOBS available in the job market.

The government needs to work on bringing jobs back from overseas and it needs to get rid of anyone doing a job that's not suppose to be in this country in the first place.

"that'll be 80,000 more votes for the next governor" - Gork

Yes, that was proven in the November re-election of First Citizen.

Unfortunately, today, people vote for what they can get at other's expense. The takers seek to assure their supply.

As Mitt Romney said, Obama knows how to promise gifts to get votes. Sad but true...

Now if we can send all the illegals back to whatever country they came from then that would open a lot of jobs that folks thought they were too good for in the past. I say grab a basket and get to pickin because I am tired of struggling to support your lazy bums! Now I know that there are different circumstances out there but I will be the first to tell you I have a family member that has taken advantage of the unemployment extensions and he is more than able to work. But as long as he has the hand out why would he want to?

happymom - "That's mean, untrue and patently unfair to people who are doing the best they can with the hand they are dealt."

AMEN!!!

And may those making those statements soon find themselves in the same predicament.

Then they'll come to know first-hand what it's like to spend hours a day searching job boards, sending out application/resume after application/resume, with nary a reply because FOURTEEN MILLION OTHER PEOPLE are looking for jobs too.

It's about time! Jobless benefits are not meant to last FOREVER! Not for a lifetime! NC cannot keep running up the credit card! $2.5 billion owed to the Federal Gov't is enough already. Former Governor Bev. Purdue was a liberal tax & spend democrat, just like Obama. Finally, she is gone and common sense can begin to run NC.

80,000 less votes for McCrony in 2016.

TV_D_Seat - "Those "pays less than my unemployment" jobs will start to get filled now, and the unemployment rate will finally go down."

And those "pays less than my unemployment" jobs will create longer lines at the welfare/food stamp offices.

So how are we ahead then?

At least EMPLOYERS pay for unemployment compensation.

WE TAXPAYERS pay for welfare and food stamps.

Realthoughts - "I guess the job seekers better get seeking a little harder! If you've been unemployed for over a year then you are either looking for that job you once had or the perfect job or just not looking at all."

May you lose your job soon, then you'll find out how silly that statement was.

There are FOURTEEN MILLION LESS JOBS in the US now than there were in 2006.

Where are those FOURTEEN MILLION PEOPLE going to find jobs now that those jobs are gone?

kornfan - "I paid into it for over twenty years and never collected a penny."

You didn't pay into it, hopefully, your employers did.

But I understand what you're saying, and I truly feel for you. When I got laid off in 2007, I was of retireable age, and I retired. Many don't have that luxury, and I truly feel sorry for them because I've been there, and I understand.

May those that don't understand and harbor ill feelings towards the unemployed soon find out themselves.

How many people posting here have actually been out looking for a job over say the last year or two? If you live in Raleigh and were used to a standard of living that was at least a little better than a homeless person, then all of a sudden the only thing you can find pays $8.00, how do you keep your home or apartment with that kind of money? And lucky if you can even find a job paying $8.00 and hour!

I believe this is decision that must be made but if Jeff Collins, Buck Newton, Phil Berger, Thom Tillis want to cut 80000 folks off at the needs then they need to quit demonizing the unemployed in how they draw a salary for sitting at home and get off their hind parts and start speaking about bringing business to NC. I am sick and tired of our fellow citizens being demonized for being laid off and throw them under the bus when every jack one of them isnt promoting jobs, business, and strengthening the economy.

kornfan2448, if your understanding of UI benefits is as you wrote below then you do not understand the system one single bit. Your EMPLOYER pays UI Taxes, thus that is where your benefit payments comes from. After 6 months you are on the FEDS dime, which means ALL of us are paying for you.

Native NC gal - "It's too bad the people who are truly looking for jobs and can't find them must be punished due to the actions (or inaction!) of those who choose to live off the system."

Lord God help us.

They aren't being "due to the actions (or inaction!) of those who choose to live off the system."

They're being punished because those at the NC ESC made a HUGE accounting error and borrowed from the Feds to cover that error, a loan which now has to be paid back.

Nobody "pays" for unemployment insurance. Your employer pays for an insurance policy that will provide EMERGENCY, SHORT TERM pay. Not years worth of pay. You have over 5 months to find something to pay your own way. This is hardly some sort of abuse to give someone 5 months before they stop EMERGENCY pay outs.

"The government needs to work on bringing jobs back from overseas and it needs to get rid of anyone doing a job that's not suppose to be in this country in the first place."

There will always be someone willing to take the place of the worker you "get rid of". Go after the employers making a profit by breaking the law and hiring these guys, and things will change. Look at AZ, TX, OK - that's what did it.

It's too bad the people who are truly looking for jobs and can't find them must be punished due to the actions (or inaction!) of those who choose to live off the system.

Native NC gal"

That's about the most accurate statement that's been made so far. Many who are or have been on unemployment COULD have found employment much sooner. May not be the "perfect" job but enough to get by until the right job came along. Now the system has been pushed past a breaking point and honestly the Govenor has little choice but to try and stop the bleeding before we all go under. Make no mistake, the FEDS WILL GET THEIRS BACK.....

I do believe we need to get out of this debt but I honestly don't know if cutting off unemployment is the best answer. However, he should take a look in the mirror and think about those raises he gave his staff before they started performing. I'm a state employee and rarely get raises. We aren't even allowed performance raises because times are tough. Why should his staff get immediate raises? I applaud the DHHS secretary for not accepting it and working for $1.

Well at least he is not affraid to make hard decisions. Wish I could say the same for the guy in the White House

"And may those making those statements soon find themselves in the same predicament."

Amen. Karma has a way of making that happen, whether you believe in it or not.

All of you people that are complaining about losing unemployment pay better hope that you did not vote for democrats over the past 5 years. You are in this position because of them. Unemployment under Bush was on average less than 6% with 8.5 million more people in the work force.

Morrigan - "That said, the cost is taken out of the workers pockets, not the businesses that enjoyed the lower UE rate in the 90's."

How so?

State law requires every company that employs 50 or more people to pay Unemployment Insurance premiums.

How does that come out of worker's pockets, except perhaps indirectly?

And yes, for decades, the Democrats lowered those premiums repeatedly, causing an unemployment fund too low to cover the disaster that struck when SEVENTEEN MILLION JOBS were liquidated between 2006/8 (three million of which has been recovered).

The Democrats knew this was going on because an audit clearly pointed out the unemployment fund was too low in the mid 2000s, yet they did nothing about it.

And here we are...

But take heart, NC isn't the only state that was caught with its pants down in this area when millions upon millions of jobs were lost in this country, and throughout the world. Many states were caught in this predicament.

I also love the "Take a job even though it may not be what you want" comments. Or, "Take a job you thought you were too good for in the past". I was in asbestos abatement, now find me the glory in that job. I am by no means lazy, but I can't force someone to hire me either.

"80,000 less votes for McCrony in 2016."

If he could be repealed, he might have to live off his own new unemployment paycheck.

@balog "I wonder how many of the 80,000 people here voted for him. I bet they are all kicking themselves now..."

On the contrary, they understand that kicking the can down road on out of control spending can't continue indefinitely.

99 weeks of unemployment is still available for those laid off. But don't expect the media to reassure the sheeeple of that.

gardenkoi - "NC cannot keep running up the credit card! $2.5 billion owed to the Federal Gov't is enough already."

That wasn't directly due to unemployment benefits, that $2.5B was due to an error at the ESC.

I feel for the people who are out of work, but at some point in time those who are working cannot afford to keep paying everyone else's bills. I applaud the Republicans efforts!

" But there are many who take advantage of these programs. I see them roaming the streets as "I" go to work."

How can you tell just by looking at someone that they are on unemployment? How can you tell that they don't work a job other than 9 - 5? You should probably get a job as a mind reader or FBI profiler. Because you are GOOOOD.

So for years employers contributions were slashed - creating a good portion of the underfunded UE fund. Now they cut benefits to $350 a week for only 13 weeks. There will be 10's of thousands of homeless - not people that have been on long term UE, but newly laid off workers that, even stumping full on for a job won;t be able to find one to pay basic needs because it can easily take 6 months or more. Sure, 99 weeks was too long, but this is shafting the basics of those that are not on the doll. Cold, heartless, and insane!

The corporations are forcing people to work more to make up for those laid off to equalize their status quo...

They won't hire here -- they will outsource and mccrory will ensure they will pay no taxes as a corp here either ---

"The current status quo of how we've done unemployment has not put more people on the payroll of private-sector jobs. It's put more people on the government payrolls of unemployment," he said.

Because few are doing anything to recoup the FOURTEEN MILLION JOBS LOST IN THIS COUNTRY between 2006/8.

Time for the government to start doing something concrete about that.

In his 2008 campaign speech in Flint, MI, Obama PROMISED to CREATE NEW JOBS.

To date, he not only has CREATED zero, saying it isn't the government's job to create jobs, he hasn't apologized for making that erroneous promise in the first place.

This country desperately needs many areas of its infrastructure repaired/replaced, from old bridges to old water systems to old sewer systems.

How about the government hiring the unemployed to work on those projects? That will get many to work directly and indirectly through peripheral jobs and industries.

greg69innc - "I am sick and tired of our fellow citizens being demonized for being laid off and throw them under the bus when every jack one of them isnt promoting jobs, business, and strengthening the economy."

Me too!!!

And I'm sick of it being done by those who know absolutely nothing about how the unemployment system works.

It makes them look like fools when they do so, because their lack of knowledge of the system is easily apparent.

And if Karma is real, it's looking for them to share the misery of unemployment.

Sumo Vita - "Go after the employers making a profit by breaking the law and hiring these guys, and things will change. Look at AZ, TX, OK - that's what did it."

The requirement to have E-9s on file for every employee and to verify the information on them through E-Verify will help that, I hope.

The fines for those who don't follow the system or knowingly hire those in this country illegally need to be made HUGE, so HUGE companies won't try to cheat on who they hire.

.mmmmm.....Look out.....State NAACP President Rev. William Barber will call this Racism

TV_D_Seat It sure will. I and my children have been there, done that. NOW people will be able to get state (taxpayer paid): help with rent, utilities, taxpayer paid food and medical insurance for all. Great way to save the state taxpayer money. Save 1000 a month and pay 1500 a month. Great way to save, just pay more in the long run. I am wondering who thought this one up...I am actually laughing at this new glitch for the unfortunate in our state. I am also crying for the homelessness and bankruptcies this will create. I am sorry we have such clueless and ignorant people in our elected capacity. Pick people up from ruins of lives and careers, they will flourish. If you offer them nothing but a bureaucrat's vision of saving money while they destroy your life, you'll never get their vote, support or, honestly, anything again. ANY person can work for minimum wage..is it worth it? Think: rent, utilities, groceries, day care, car insurance..gas..repairs. NO way. Basic math skills here.

ribbondancer - "I do believe we need to get out of this debt but I honestly don't know if cutting off unemployment is the best answer."

In all honesty, it probably has to happen, but I'd like to see it done month at a time and I'd like to see it spread 50/50 between those applying for unemployment and companies within the state, not the 60/40 which is what I think is being presented.

For instance, if those applying for unemployment the first quarter of this year, get only one month less unemployment instead of 12 months less. Then those applying new in the second quarter get 2 months less, and so forth. Then it's gradual and it hurts less.

But it still needs to be split evenly 50/50 between companies and people. PERIOD!!!

kornfan2448: "I get laid off...and live off 1/3 less than what I was struggling to live on.. and people call it a "gravy train"".

It wasn't meant to be a "gravy train". It was meant to help you transition to a new job. Even if the new job pays less than what you made before.

The fact that you were struggling while working says a lot about your ability to live within your means. Do you have cable TV? A monthly payment cell phone? Go out to movies/clubs? Have lots of things you could live without? Drink alcohol? Smoke? Could you do with less of a living space or car? Eat less expensive food?

Get the idea? Look into your life and find where to cut out expenses you can get by without.

Billions of people around the world are happy to have a bowl of rice to eat. When was the last, or first, time you had rice for a meal?

I have hundreds of times because it's economical and helps me get by while paying the bills.

Adapt to survive. Economical is the new black. Frugal is the new cool.

I think McCrory, might be wrong on this one. But the job market is already starting to pick up and he will not suffer politically. He is keeping his republican promise, no more extended benefits. He had to be able to pay those new higher salaries for the cabinet. They deserve a living wage, 120K.

"(McCrory) he should take a look in the mirror and think about those raises he gave his staff before they started performing."

Needs to be repeated. EVERYONE should be absolutely screaming about this!!! Arrogant to get rid of those trying and even MORE arrogant to give raises with no work done yet except destroying others lives.

Doesn't matter if the person is Democrat or Republican, they are both the same when it comes to politics against the PEOPLE.

ribbondancer24 You are way ahead of me. I did not know this. NO one deserved a raise...a raise for...what? Do you know? I do not. Thanks if you can answer that question.

The goal should be to make conditions in NC attractive to job creators, thereby increasing employment opportunities and ending the unemployment train wreck. Despite the ignorant statements of Democrats like Nancy Pelosi, unemployment benefits are NOT the best stimulus to the economy, people with good jobs and good income are!

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

Political Video Picks

 
  • Both the House and Senate are controlled by Republicans, but House Republicans do not agree with all of the proposals put forward by…

  • President Barack Obama addresses the United States drone program and Guantanamo Bay prison in a national security speech from the…

  • President Barack Obama on Thursday defended America's controversial drone attacks as legal, effective and a necessary linchpin in an…

  • The N.C. Senate holds its final vote on its $20.6 billion state budget proposal for 2013-14.

  • Gov. Pat McCrory and Raleigh Mayor Nancy McFarlane on Thursday asked the General Assembly to give the city and state about 10 months…

  • Gov. Pat McCrory and Raleigh Mayor Nancy McFarlane discuss the efforts of the North Carolina General Assembly to rewrite legislation…