tallwillow: profile 
tallwillow
gender: female
city: raleigh, nc
golo member since: March 5, 2008
about tallwillow
With Liberty and Justice for ALL
favorites
favorite web sites: Beliefnet.com, www.adhdrollercoaster.com, www.ThyCa.org
sandra carrington-smith created a blog post.
thank you golo!
Today at 9:04 a.m.
angela_the golo editor created an image gallery.
a few parade photos
Nov. 21, 2009
lolly joined a group.
privately public
Nov. 20, 2009
carycrazzy created a blog post.
con amor!!!!!
Nov. 16, 2009
gucci - proud liberal piggy created a blog post.
creepy!!!
Nov. 16, 2009
brat is kestrel - digging in posted new profile info.
Nov. 16, 2009
elcid89 created a blog post.
yay!
Nov. 5, 2009
t-man created a blog post.
asking questions
Oct. 22, 2009
ryoung created a blog post.
zombieland - a review
Oct. 5, 2009
xarabelle and tallwillow became friends.
Aug. 10, 2009
close38 Lifetime Comments *
* Some comments may have been deleted![[no avatar]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/presentation/v1/images/golo/noavatar.gif){kind=avatar}
(7 votes) funeral held for slain fayetteville girl
(2 votes) busch wins title, nationwide finale
Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
November 5, 2009 7:52 a.m.
the fBC is female birth control and mBC is male birth control. I can really go apesmurf on the issues regarding the limited and archaic mBC, (essentially limited to 'paper or plastic' - either way its a bag) but I'll save you the boredome! :)
Thanks for the carrying the civility with me! The topic is soooo emotional. I don't get why folks feel that throwing epithets, extremes, etc around will change the other side's point of view - especially considering most adults have thoughtfully decided their viewpoint and probably won't change! oh well. Anyhoo - Thanks!!!!
GOLO member since September 22, 2008
November 4, 2009 10:20 a.m.
/* bump stumble bump */
/* giggle */
/* knock, knock, knock */
Trick or treat!
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
October 31, 2009 4:58 p.m.
GOLO member since September 1, 2007
September 16, 2009 11:10 a.m.
How did you arrive at that conclusion? I said those idiots are praying. I didn't say those fine people are idiots because they are praying.
Let me help you out with basic reading comprehension:
"Those idiots" (the subject of the sentence)
"appear to be praying" (the action/verb of the sentence).
There is no cause and effect here. The idiots in the picture......... do appear to be praying. That they are praying is not what makes them idiots. They're just idiots. And they happen to be on their knees, as well, praying.
GOLO member since January 2, 2008
August 25, 2009 2:58 p.m.
Actually, I didn't dodge the questions. My first post on this blog basically said only hypocrites pick and choose the sins they are concerned about.
GOLO member since January 2, 2008
August 25, 2009 2:36 p.m.
The short answer is "I'm for it" - but that is an over simplification
"From the fact that people are very different it follows that, if we treat them equally, the result must be inequality in their actual position, and that the only way to place them in an equal position would be to treat them differently. Equality before the law and material equality are therefore not only different but are in conflict with each other; and we can achieve either one or the other, but not both at the same time." -- F. A. Hayek
GOLO member since May 15, 2009
August 23, 2009 8:14 p.m.
GOLO member since May 15, 2009
August 23, 2009 5:44 p.m.
GOLO member since May 15, 2009
August 23, 2009 5:42 p.m.
If marriage is a "right", why ios there a marriage license (i.e.premission) required. One could argue that the fact taht "gay marriage" is not legal or "permitted" as is traditional marriage is in fact an un-equal application of the law.
And for the SCOTUS decison the key opinion is this one:
"The Equal Protection Clause requires the consideration of whether the classifications drawn by any statute constitute an arbitrary and invidious discrimination."
Tha tdecision refers to marriage as parto fothe civil rights of man but it does not mean that marriage is a right like the life lineberty and pursuit of happiness" in an of itself.
Marriage is a legal contract we have a right to enter into - the SSM has not been allowed going to comment about "unequal application of the law" versus "violation of right to marry".
GOLO member since May 15, 2009
August 23, 2009 5:40 p.m.
Please log in to add comment.