elcid89: profile 
elcid89
born: 1938
gender: male
golo member since: September 6, 2007
about elcid89
With all of the complaining that goes on here (some of you honestly seem incapable of doing anything else BUT complaining ...), GoLo has become depressing.
With the general trend towards the banal and inane, GoLo has become a waste of my time.
What is it about this place, which has so much promise of bringing people together to discuss ideas and learn from one another, that it brings out the worst in people instead?
You'll forgive me if I take my leave of it.
rev. rb aka troll magnet created a blog post.
a child's thoughts...
Nov. 22 11:23 p.m.
godschild43 created a blog post.
never judge
Nov. 22 7:29 p.m.
smorgas_of_borg created a blog post.
the day our world stood still
Nov. 22 5:12 p.m.
scubagirl- 4 mos. smoke free created a blog post.
cinnamon-from kandahar to maryland
Nov. 22 12:41 p.m.
sandra carrington-smith created a blog post.
thank you golo!
Nov. 22 9:04 a.m.
jules posted new profile info.
Nov. 21, 2009
007 - granco.shhhhh dont tell created a blog post.
for mojo......
Nov. 21, 2009
just_another_nic created a blog post.
what would you do? (prime time)
Nov. 20, 2009
random musings created a blog post.
twilight: new moon movie review
Nov. 20, 2009
con amor luvs u regardless created a blog post.
con amor hopes everyone has a safe weekend!!!
Nov. 20, 2009
close![[no avatar]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/presentation/v1/images/golo/noavatar.gif){kind=avatar}
Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
GOLO member since January 25, 2008
July 23, 2009 9:28 p.m.
Did Governor Easley do something illegal, or even unethical, about inquiring into the possibility of his wife getting a state-paid job, and then entering into discussions about it? I can't think of any couple I know of who wouldn't handle it the way this pair have done if the wife wanted a job with the same employer as her husband.
All other possible no-nos aside - the campaign contributions, trips, and Mary Easley's pay raise - was Governor Easley's participation in her hiring illegal?
GOLO member since July 29, 2007
July 24, 2009 12:54 a.m.
GOLO member since January 19, 2008
July 24, 2009 9:50 a.m.
Possibly from the same place that some got the idea that Americans would be better served by choosing "average joes" to be our leaders. I don't want someone "just like me" to be my leader. I want someone better. And I certainly don't want someone like Joe the plumber or Sarah Palin, whose only apparent qualification is a lack of knowledge of, or interest in, the world outside their own limited experience.
For those who do want that, intellect and academic achievement make you one of the dreaded "them" and not one of "us". I suppose America has always had its share of thes folks. I can only hope their ranks aren't growing - just their visibility.
GOLO member since January 25, 2008
July 24, 2009 10:14 a.m.
Point taken - I wasn't sure if North Carolina had a law forbidding it. Do NOT think I'd like to be Governor. Nope, no thanks.
GOLO member since July 29, 2007
July 24, 2009 11:55 a.m.
GOLO member since April 20, 2009
July 24, 2009 9:55 p.m.
GOLO member since March 31, 2008
July 27, 2009 1:21 p.m.
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
July 27, 2009 1:38 p.m.
GOLO member since February 6, 2008
July 27, 2009 7:44 p.m.
GOLO member since July 29, 2007
July 28, 2009 7:32 a.m.
GOLO member since July 3, 2007
July 28, 2009 8:25 a.m.
GOLO member since January 9, 2008
July 28, 2009 5:03 p.m.
I am so sorry to hear...........
I HOPE your doing 110% better!
GOLO member since November 5, 2009
July 28, 2009 7:21 p.m.
GOLO member since March 15, 2009
July 28, 2009 8:46 p.m.
July 30, 2009 2:01 a.m.
GOLO member since July 29, 2009
July 30, 2009 5:14 p.m.
GOLO member since August 3, 2007
July 31, 2009 1:39 p.m.
GOLO member since July 30, 2009
July 31, 2009 6:30 p.m.
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
August 1, 2009 6:52 a.m.
GOLO member since December 9, 2007
August 1, 2009 9:24 p.m.
GOLO member since July 29, 2007
August 4, 2009 1:58 p.m.
GOLO member since July 20, 2007
August 4, 2009 8:57 p.m.
GOLO member since August 16, 2007
August 6, 2009 10:50 a.m.
GOLO member since July 29, 2009
August 6, 2009 5:18 p.m.
Well, after 8 years of being non compliant with my Doctor, 4 weeks ago I finally opened my eyes and have gotten a handle on this blasted type 2 diabetes. I am walking up to 4 miles a day, being very an al about my carb intake, and have gone from 240 to 216 in a month. That truck should get smaller every day, and I'm sure if you listen to your doctor, everything will be fine. Hang in there, and I look forward to seeing you back on GOLO on a regular basis soon. We might be opposite on a lot of things, but that will never preclude me wishing you a sincere GET WELL SOON. And now....I must go for my morning walk. Jerry
GOLO member since July 29, 2009
August 8, 2009 5:21 a.m.
We miss your unwavering wisdom (at least I do, lol!).
Take care!!
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
August 10, 2009 12:43 p.m.
GOLO member since February 14, 2008
August 10, 2009 1:18 p.m.
GOLO member since January 20, 2008
August 12, 2009 8:52 p.m.
August 12, 2009 9:05 p.m.
August 12, 2009 10:18 p.m.
August 12, 2009 10:37 p.m.
I've always heard that a merchant is never required to sell anything at any price, even if it was the correct price.
GOLO member since January 2, 2008
August 13, 2009 11:41 a.m.
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
August 16, 2009 9:00 p.m.
I have a legal question for you, prompted by a comment on my blog today. If a doctor wished to run a very simple private practice, and be able to charge lower fees, would it be possible for him to only serve patients who agreed to waive their right to sue him for malpractice?
Presumably, the quid pro quo for this waiver would be the lower fees, and perhaps easier access to a doctor who didn't have a huge case load.
It would be a niche market, to be sure, but I doubt it would be possible financially without avoiding the cost of malpractice.
GOLO member since January 25, 2008
August 17, 2009 6:10 p.m.
Perhaps if the needed treatment was urgent and dire, or there were no other options available. But what about the person who elects, at a time when he is not sick, to become a regular patient of this particular practice, knowing that right around the corner are more expensive practices that don't have such a requirement? Is this not simply an informed choice, made freely by a reasonable consumer?
Is it not akin to a "ride at your own risk" feature in other commercial enterprises?
GOLO member since January 25, 2008
August 18, 2009 12:04 p.m.
GOLO member since July 19, 2007
August 18, 2009 1:38 p.m.
It's highly dependent on what was advertised and how it was advertised. The next time you read a sale circular, try to find the part with the really small writing. It will contain all sorts of disclaimers intended to protect the seller from legal action stemming from failure to perform."
But I don't think a merchant is required by law to sell anything at all to anyone. They can kick you out of their store if they think your breath stinks. Surely they also can refuse to sell you something.
I'm really curious about this. Is there a law that requires a merchant to sell anything at all, even if it's on their store shelf with a price tag on it? I don't think so. I think they can kick everyone out and lock their door if they like, without giving anyone a reason.
GOLO member since January 2, 2008
August 18, 2009 4:37 p.m.
GOLO member since January 2, 2008
August 18, 2009 4:39 p.m.
Anyone...[who isn't me]
(I fixed that for ya - no need to thank me)
Oh go on and laugh...it's good for your health!""""
That is supposed to be a joke - I make no claims as to particular comedic skills.
GOLO member since May 15, 2009
August 19, 2009 10:36 a.m.
NCGS ยง 14-117 (http://law.justia.com/northcarolina/codes/chapter_14/gs_14-117.html)"
Actually, I was aware of false advertising. So I can't intentionally run an add to sell a nice truck for $45 if I have no intentions of selling it.
My point was that even if I did that, I'm not require by law to actually sell it. (Although, according to that statute, I'd be guilty of false advertising if I did that...)
GOLO member since January 2, 2008
August 19, 2009 11:10 a.m.
A good example of why it is dangerous to "assume"...
GOLO member since May 15, 2009
August 19, 2009 11:30 a.m.
GOLO member since November 18, 2008
August 19, 2009 11:41 a.m.
GOLO member since November 5, 2009
August 19, 2009 2:37 p.m.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gWfSZB4v4g
GOLO member since March 18, 2008
August 22, 2009 1:50 p.m.
GOLO member since November 5, 2009
August 26, 2009 10:55 a.m.
Reality is often disappointing, I have found....
GOLO member since May 15, 2009
August 26, 2009 2:24 p.m.
yes, its a long story
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
August 26, 2009 5:03 p.m.
GOLO member since December 29, 2008
August 26, 2009 5:15 p.m.
GOLO member since October 24, 2007
August 26, 2009 9:28 p.m.
""First name of Goldberg and ______y toast""
Doesn't ring any bells still, but I can live with that. Thanks for trying.
GOLO member since January 20, 2008
August 26, 2009 10:11 p.m.
Please log in to add comment.