GOLO: Go Local. Talk Local. Share Local.
freezy h. mcquackers: blog ↓

don't shoot the messenger


the republican 'purity test'

Published November 24, 2009
Views: 1523

 

Conservative Republican Party activists want to withhold money from GOP candidates who stray too far from party orthodoxy.

Ten Republican National Committee members are distributing a plan to impose a purity test – calling for money to be withheld from anyone who disagrees with conservative principles on more than two of 10 core issues.

 

[...]

 

WHEREAS, President Ronald Reagan believed that the Republican Party should support and espouse conservative principles and public policies; and

WHEREAS, President Ronald Reagan also believed the Republican Party should welcome those with diverse views; and

WHEREAS, President Ronald Reagan believed, as a result, that someone who agreed with him 8 out of 10 times was his friend, not his opponent; and

WHEREAS, Republican faithfulness to its conservative principles and public policies and Republican solidarity in opposition to Obama’s socialist agenda is necessary to preserve the security of our country, our economic and political freedoms, and our way of life; and

WHEREAS, Republican faithfulness to its conservative principles and public policies is necessary to restore the trust of the American people in the Republican Party and to lead to Republican electoral victories; and

WHEREAS, the Republican National Committee shares President Ronald Reagan’s belief that the Republican Party should espouse conservative principles and public policies and welcome persons of diverse views; and

WHEREAS, the Republican National Committee desires to implement President Reagan’s Unity Principle for Support of Candidates; and

WHEREAS, in addition to supporting candidates, the Republican National Committee provides financial support for Republican state and local parties for party building and federal election activities, which benefits all candidates and is not affected by this resolution; and

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Republican National Committee identifies ten (10) key public policy positions for the 2010 election cycle, which the Republican National Committee expects its public officials and candidates to support:

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama’s “stimulus” bill;
(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare;
(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;
(4) We support workers’ right to secret ballot by opposing card check;
(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;
(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;
(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;
(8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;
(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing, denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and
(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership; and be further

RESOLVED, that a candidate who disagrees with three or more of the above stated public policy positions of the Republican National Committee, as identified by the voting record, public statements and/or signed questionnaire of the candidate, shall not be eligible for financial support and endorsement by the Republican National Committee; and be further

RESOLVED, that upon the approval of this resolution the Republican National Committee shall deliver a copy of this resolution to each of Republican members of Congress, all Republican candidates for Congress, as they become known, and to each Republican state and territorial party office.

 

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/11/24/some-conservatives-push-a-purity-test-for-gop-candidates/

 

---------------------------------

Some of these, namely #1, are great ideas. Others, I feel, will further the party's decline.

 

Filed under: Politics




71 Comments


Golo

Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.

You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.

View Comments View Comments


page 1 | 2 | 3
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

We don't need any more restrictions on guns. Enforce the laws we have and take the bad guys off the streets. Anti-gunners elevators don't run to the top. Purity Test, what a joke! This is typical of the right wing nuts left in the Republican party after the religous right takeover. My way or the highway attitude is part of the reason the party is disliked by so many in the country. A country can't be governed if the political ideology is split with one side hammering the other with the full power of AM radio. The GOP's defacto leader(Limbaugh)wants a clensing, flush and purge the party of moderates and rinos. Only 23 to 24 percent of Americans are claiming affiliation with the Republican party. A futher move to the right will drive Independents away. With the evidence of changing demographics in the country in the last election, Republicans lost Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Independentds, Labor, Gays, Females, and the Youth of the nation, How many more do they want to drive away?

Not to belabor the point, OS, but you did notice, I'm sure, that self-identified liberals and moderates, taken together, constitute a majority.

In any case, I think we've discussed this more than enough already. Neither of us is going to budge an inch, so it's probably best left to the elections to determine which of us is right.

If the Republicans can run to the right on social issues and still manage to get elected, then I'll admit you're right. Until then, it hasn't been working that well for you guys. NY23rd, for example ...

"The republicans problem is not on social issues - it is fiscal issues. They have lost all credibility on spending and smaller gov't. You can see the world as you think it is, or see the world as it really is. Either way, it will be what it really is."

No argument that they need to get serious about fiscal responsibility, but in order to do that, they have to win first.

And socially conservative issues will cost them votes. Mine for one. They can come up with the best fiscal plan in the world, but until they drop the social stuff, I'll never vote for them because I just can not support that sort of thing. Ever. I'm not alone in that determination.

As I said before, who else are the social conservative people going to vote for? It's not like any politician is ever actually going to deliver on their desired agenda, so why even make it an issue to begin with? Why not focus on something we all can agree on, fiscal discipline, instead?

http://www.gallup.com/poll/123854/Conservatives-Maintain-Edge-Top-Ideological-Group.aspx

http://www.gallup.com/poll/118399/More-Americans-Pro-Life-Than-Pro-Choice-First-Time.aspx

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/march_2009/68_say_those_who_employ_illegal_immigrants_should_be_punished

Need I continue?

"Polling notwithstanding, the folks that are willing to vote Republican solely based on socially conservative issues is not a sufficient majority to win elections."

I guess I missed the part where anyone advocated runing "solely" on social issues. While abandoning half the population to satisfy your personal worldview may make sense to you, it doesn't to anyone who really looks at the evidence.

Take another look at the above list. As far as social issues, I count 1 or 2 out of ten. (3 if you really stretch it.)

The republicans problem is not on social issues - it is fiscal issues. They have lost all credibility on spending and smaller gov't. You can see the world as you think it is, or see the world as it really is. Either way, it will be what it really is.

"LOL, no, not really."

Uhhh - yeah really.

When the current Admin & Congress run up a deficit bigger that all the previous Administrations and Congresses before them COMBINED, that "point" to which you refer is completely meaningless - regardless of which party over saw it...

The sky is blue.

(just waiting to see what you say in disagreement to that statement...)

I think the GOP would go a long way to jettison the 'social conservatism' that pander to the Farwell's; Robertson's and every other TV gameshow host or televangelist. I can't tell the difference sometimes.

The GOP should focus on:

National Defense

Fiscal Responsibility

Immigration Enforcement

Personal Responsibility

Pandering to the "Moral Majority" only makes the GOP irrevelant.

"All rendered void and meaningless given the current Congress and Administration...so that was almost a good point - right up until the time you started typing it...."

LOL, no, not really. While I dislike the policy, Democrats have not to my knowledge ran on promises of fiscal responsibility and shrinking government. They're doing what history and policy pretty much indicate that they'd do.

Where the irony comes in is when Republicans DO preach fiscal constraint and smaller government, but do just the opposite once elected.

Short version: both sides do it. One side just lies about doing it to get elected.

"Bush oversaw the largest expansion of the federal government since at least Regan, when Bush created the TSA and DHS. It should also be noted that Clinton oversaw the largest reduction of the federal government in at least 20 years."

All rendered void and meaningless given the current Congress and Administration...so that was almost a good point - right up until the time you started typing it....

"Elcid, I completely agree with you. I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy on GOLO regarding backing up one's claims with evidence."

I know. My comment was poorly worded. The "you" in it was directed at OS, not at you. Sorry for the confusing context.

page 1 | 2 | 3
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

Please log in to add comment.

most recent
   blogs    galleries    profiles    groups    popular  

thanks!!

 Thanks Beth and Don for strolling around Oakwood Cemetery in Raleigh this afternoon with me and my camera. It was a great...

obama: can he find his bottom?

 23% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-four...

more signs of spring!!!

Later tonight I will put up more pictures I have taken "Around The Yard" as I know many enjoy them...I cannot Thank...

ncaa tournament

• UPSET! St. Mary's over Villanova  ! __________________________________________ Ohio vs. Tenn    _ ...

jon stewart nails it again!

I don't care who you are, this is funny! Definitely a classic TV moment! ...

need a tow truck?

I saw this on failblog and had to share- from the NC Outer Banks, it looks like.  I think it's clever!!   clicky...

got beach fever yet?

Photo at Cherry Grove Beach, SC last summer. North Myrtle Beach is coming to life! Click...

saturday's missing child

Endangered Missing ...

one simple question

I've been asking, for several days, one simple questions that is apparently unanswerable.   A simple...

what i want to know is

WHO invented teenagers? and WHY Why? WHy? WHY!?! and oh yeah, Happy Spring...

   blogs    galleries    profiles    groups    popular  
Generic Profile Image

profile of freedomnomore1

I think that All people need to open their eyes to what is going on in Chinas New capitol of washington...

Generic Profile Image

profile of eddier

Time for some more change!

Generic Profile Image

profile of executive

Crazy, good times....

Generic Profile Image

profile of brandonwestbrook10

Naples Luxury Rentals

profile of mistersinister

I'm from up north, but I've lived in NC since the 90's.  I love hockey and college football,...

Generic Profile Image
Generic Profile Image
   blogs    galleries    profiles    groups    popular  

christian website design (1 member)

This is a place to discuss Christian website design and share your thoughts about how to design a good website that serves God's...

Generic Profile Image

make money (1 member)

this is an awesome group. ====== Make Money

the golo paddy wagon (1 member)

The goal of this group is to round up members who have violated TOS and committed various other violations

Generic Profile Image

tranquility ii (13 members)

Generic Profile Image

lolly blogging (1 member)

blog while friend's only

Generic Profile Image

save our wolves (2 members)

Generic Profile Image

christian life skills (3 members)

This group is intended as a common meeting place for all who seek the divine presence of Jesus in our lives.  Life and business...

Generic Profile Image

stackoverflow (2 members)

   blogs    galleries    profiles    groups    popular  

profile of godschild43

I believe that God is the way the truth and light. Always live by him.

profile of vette

 Never do anything you're too embarrassed to describe to the paramedics. Always try to...

"built ford tough"

It was somewhere around the beginning of the previous century when a fellow by the name of Henry Ford...

citizen....

 ... I want Y O U  to shut up and be a good little serf!...

jon stewart nails it again!

I don't care who you are, this is funny! Definitely a classic TV moment! ...

traffic chaos predicted in d.c.

The short buses are heading to town. At least they will be riding in a familiar type of vehicle while drinking...

got beach fever yet?

Photo at Cherry Grove Beach, SC last summer. North Myrtle Beach is coming to life!...

one simple question

I've been asking, for several days, one simple questions that is apparently unanswerable.   A...

what i want to know is

WHO invented teenagers? and WHY Why? WHy? WHY!?! and oh yeah,...