prometheus: blog 
prometheus' blog
so - how's that "hope" and "change" workin' out for ya?
Published Nov. 8, 2009Views: 853
You people wanted "democracy" - now we're getting it - good and hard....
Filed under: Crime
close61 Comments
![[no avatar]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/presentation/v1/images/golo/noavatar.gif){kind=avatar}
top-voted stories
(61 votes) man charged with death of fayetteville child
(13 votes) man charged with raping, killing nc girl, 5
(9 votes) army keeping media from palin event
(6 votes) two sought in rocky mount shooting
most recent
Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
GOLO member since July 26, 2007
November 9, 2009 8:03 a.m.
GOLO member since July 26, 2007
November 9, 2009 6:50 a.m.
It only seems that way because conservatives are so blind.
November 9, 2009 5:18 a.m.
Here are some exact numbers for you: Obama explicitly stated that unemployment would not rise above 8% if the stimulous bill passed.
The stimulous bill passed.
Today we are at 10.2% unemployment.
Any other exact numbers you want?
GOLO member since October 13, 2009
November 9, 2009 3:02 a.m.
GOLO member since October 27, 2009
November 9, 2009 3:00 a.m.
GOLO member since October 6, 2007
November 9, 2009 1:45 a.m.
I asked for exact numbers. You failed. It's that simple.
GOLO member since October 12, 2007
November 8, 2009 11:35 p.m.
If this is not actually what they think, then your argument is a straw man. If it is actually what they think, then what you meant to say was that their argument is a false dichotomy, since in fact Obama and nothing are not the only two choices. Hey look -- I am a liberal and just said they are not the only two choices, which means we don't actually think that, making your argument a straw man. How about that.
GOLO member since October 30, 2007
November 8, 2009 11:35 p.m.
Geez. Give us a hard one."
Apparently it was too hard for you . I asked for the exact number, not "X or less". Was that really so hard to understand? Since you're so sure the number would be lower without the stimulus bill, you should have no problem giving the exact number. Just give us the number and the statistically significant data you used to come up with the number. If you can't, your "You have to admit that the stimulus is stimulating unemployment" is just another example of the unsupported BS we're used to seeing from the hate Obama crowd.
GOLO member since October 12, 2007
November 8, 2009 11:34 p.m.
Uh, no. This is not "what they say", this is "what was said". By one of your guys. At 10:40PM.
Please try to keep up. You're wasting our time.
GOLO member since July 17, 2007
November 8, 2009 11:26 p.m.
Please log in to add comment.