carolina: blog carolina's blog
ballot initiative that supports "traditional marriage" by outlawing divorce
Published Nov. 4, 2009Views: 338
2010 California Marriage Protection Act Needs 694,354 Signatures by March 2010 to Qualify for the November Ballot
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS109292+04-Nov-2009+BW20091104
SACRAMENTO, Calif.--(Business Wire)-- John Marcotte, a married father of two who voted against last year`s Prop 8, might seem an unusual proponent for a bill designed to further "protect traditional marriage" until he explains how he plans to do it: by outlawing divorce in the state of California.
"When I first heard about Prop 8, I figured that most of its proponents were homophobic, or had unfounded fears that allowing same-sex marriage in California would force classrooms to teach about the subject," says Marcotte. "But when I learned that Prop 8 was really about protecting traditional marriage, I recognized that there was a real opportunity to go a step further and outlaw divorce, since it brings about the death of every traditional marriage."
Marcotte worked with an attorney friend to draft the legal language for his bill, The 2010 California Marriage Protection Act, and paid the $200 registration fee out of his own pocket to submit the proposal for consideration. His wife was initially hesitant to have Marcotte spend money on the idea, but donations quickly rolled into a website he created - http://www.rescuemarriage.org - that have paid for the expense. The website features video PSAs and T-shirts for sale, including one that states: "You said, `Til death do us part.` You`re not dead yet."
Just two weeks ago, Marcotte received approval from the office of California Secretary of State Debra Bowen for his marriage initiative, which prepared a legal title and summary (http://www.sos.ca.gov/admin/press-releases/2009/db09-063.pdf) that will appear on initiative petitions, the first step in placing the bill on the California ballot in 2010. There`s good news for taxpayers too: according to the Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance, the state could save hundreds of millions of dollars annually due to the elimination of divorce court proceedings.
The onus is now upon Marcotte and the bill`s supporters to collect the signatures of 694,354 registered voters, or 8 percent of the total votes cast in the 2006 election, by the March 22 deadline. Due to signature-gathering irregularities, the proponents of the initiative will likely have to collect more than 1 million signatures to advance their proposed text to the ballot for voters to consider. A rally is scheduled for November 14 in Sacramento, where married couples will renew their vows on the steps of the Capitol. Marcotte has already found a number of supporters from both the right and the left and has accrued more than 7,000 followers on Facebook.
For Marcotte, his Marriage Protection Act is but the first step in raising awareness about the next great battle to protect traditional marriage within California but he hopes that other states will take his lead and join in on the movement. "This isn`t about taking away someone`s rights, it`s about what we value as a society," he says. "We live in a divorce-promiscuous society. It`s on the television, it`s in the movies, the newspapers. It`s even in our kids` textbooks. Just because almost half of all marriages eventually end in divorce doesn`t make it okay."
RescueMarriage.org
Mike Hope, 310-849-9259
Yes, I know that this is satirical, and that the person who drafted the bill is poking fun at the Proposition 8 and "Yes on 1" folks. However, he actually has received approval to gather signatures in order to add this to the 2010 ballot. And looking at this from a strictly Biblical standpoint, I don't see why anyone would have a probably with it. At the very least the Catholic Church should be thrilled. Discuss.
Filed under: News & Issues
20 Comments
(22 votes) deadly wrecks mar thanksgiving holiday
(3 votes) funeral held for slain fayetteville girl







































Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
November 4, 2009 7:44 p.m.
GOLO member since October 18, 2007
November 4, 2009 5:15 p.m.
GOLO member since December 21, 2007
November 4, 2009 5:03 p.m.
GOLO member since December 21, 2007
November 4, 2009 4:58 p.m.
Asserting that I shouldn't want the government to "control" or be involved in my marriage but yet suggest that same-sex couples should not be denied the same government "control"...
Sorry, I don't follow you.
GOLO member since November 11, 2008
November 4, 2009 4:55 p.m.
lol, personal responsibility doesn't exist anymore...everything is passed off as "not my fault". if the average american wants to act like a 3 yr old, pitch fits about every little thing, and not take responsiblity for their actions, maybe big brother needs to come in and tell everyone what to do.
GOLO member since September 5, 2008
November 4, 2009 4:49 p.m.
I never understood how those who vocally abhor government involvement in our lives always want the government involved in things like abortion and marriage; two of the most personal things imaginable.
As for personal responsibility, to many, things that are often out of one's control such as poverty is a matter of personal responsibility--but things that are totally about personal responsibility like divorce, to them, are circumstantial.
I swear sometimes it is like living in Bizzarro World.
GOLO member since January 16, 2009
November 4, 2009 4:48 p.m.
It's pretty sad that you're willing to give the gov't so much control over your life. Whatever happened to PERSONAL responsibility?
GOLO member since December 21, 2007
November 4, 2009 4:43 p.m.
Marriage should be a long term contract. By reducing the number of divorces, there would be less sporadic separations, less division of property, less children forced to live between two homes. Men are now less likely to commit to marriage for fear of loosing 1/2 of what they worked out, 1/2 of their retirement, etc.
And, there might be more suspicious deaths so choose wisely.
GOLO member since November 11, 2008
November 4, 2009 4:41 p.m.
LOL and probably true!
GOLO member since March 27, 2009
November 4, 2009 4:28 p.m.
Please log in to add comment.