charlesboyer: blog charlesboyer's blog
cable news and balloon boys parents played y'all for suckers
Published Oct. 16, 2009Views: 442
PT Barnum once said that "a sucker is born every minute" when asked why people accepted his outlandish claims about the wonders of his circus shows. And he was right. People like to fool themselves, we saw that in spades yesterday.
The truth about yesterday's Balloon Boy story is coming out: the family involved played the cable networks for suckers, and they bit hard, just as they knew they would. That's predictable. Cable news lives and dies with sensationalism and hype and what story could possibly be sexier than a poor little boy caught in the sky in a big silver balloon? Well, maybe if he had been a 17 year old blonde and beautiful white girl, but that's about it.
What's even more predictable was the way that people reacted to half-aced shoddy reporting, hanging on every word as though it were the absolute truth. The Internet, from Twitter, to the web, to sites like these came alive instantly, breathlessly repeating the story as it was "reported" - if you can call playing fast and loose with the truth "reporting." That of course sent hundreds of thousands if not millions of people to their TVs and to the cable news websites to get "the latest."
The latest was nothing more than conjecture and postulating, which are not facts, of course. They are just talking heads gossiping like you or I would at the office water cooler. That and of course the endless repitition of video of the balloon in the sky. That was easy to find and the over the video, blah blah blah.
The bottom line is that the cable news people don't care if the story was ever real, they suckered America into tuning in and watching, and also watching the commercials in between. That means $$$ for them and that's their ONLY purpose for being. Journalism and truth are not real priorities, they are in reality their cover story for little more than tabloid journalism. In fact, it is so bad that some fiction writers adhere to reality better than some cable TV 'reporters.'
What really amazes me is the constant ability of people to lack a healthy skepticism to what they are seeing and to willingly allow their heartstrings to be tugged without the least bit of reasonable doubt. Why do we never "consider the source?" This story is a plain example of so many others that dominate these days: make it up as you go, truth be darned and cover your rear end later with plausible deniability. And people lap it up. Why? I just don't get it: we should know better because the cable news people simply lather, rinse and repeat.
For the record, when the news organizations were saying that the boy was missing and that the authorities were fearing that he had fallen out of the balloon, I said that he was probably hiding for fear of his parents. That was what I would have done when I was his age. Not quite right, it turns out, but far closer to the truth than the sensationlism of a kid falling to his death.
Next time, whether it is the war, politics, sports, or whatever, put some doubt into what you are seeing right then and there. The story will change, bet on it.
Finally, I suggest to anyone that watches hours of cable news - CNN, Fox, MSNBC, doesn't matter - to go and get a pre-frontal lobotomy to save themselves some time. They are making you brain dead as it is.
Filed under: Arts & Entertainment
22 Comments
(26 votes) palin dines with rev. billy graham
(15 votes) funeral held for slain fayetteville girl
(14 votes) 4 us service members die in afghan attacks






































Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
GOLO member since August 8, 2007
October 16, 2009 6:59 a.m.
GOLO member since April 10, 2008
October 16, 2009 7:02 a.m.
waste of time
GOLO member since April 8, 2009
October 16, 2009 7:05 a.m.
But CNN/Wolf Blitzer surely got p-yup-ed upon by the boy's dad yesterday, didn't they?!?
FE
October 16, 2009 7:10 a.m.
October 16, 2009 7:24 a.m.
GOLO member since February 20, 2009
October 16, 2009 7:33 a.m.
but you have the internet hum? (I know- its only for the free porn sites- I like them too..)
GOLO member since February 20, 2009
October 16, 2009 7:34 a.m.
GOLO member since January 19, 2009
October 16, 2009 8:09 a.m.
Funny that you bring that up, because it is absolutely relevant. The War of The Worlds broadcast was not just a radio short story gone amok. It was an orchestrated experiment, as opposed to an honest mistake on the part of it's producer. Those in charge of it's production were shocked by the genuine quality of the panic. The early electronic media studied the results of the broadcast, and modern media and advertising is what what have today as a result of that broadcast. The War of The Worlds broadcast was no mistake.
GOLO member since February 23, 2009
October 16, 2009 8:15 a.m.
GOLO member since February 23, 2009
October 16, 2009 8:25 a.m.
Please log in to add comment.