tmedlin: blog tmedlin's blog
barack hussein obama obviously never bothered to "read" the constitution!
Published Jul. 5, 2009Views: 512
Obama: Hey, let’s bypass the Senate on treaty ratifications
by Ed Morrissey
After listening to the Democrats screech for the last two years about the rule of law, this Jake Tapper report should be surprising …. but it’s not. Apparently, Barack Obama finds treaty ratification a little too complicated, and so he figures he can just commit the US to nuclear disarmament and bypass Congressional oversight:
With the clock running out on a new US-Russian arms treaty before the previous Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, expires on December 5, a senior White House official said Sunday said that the difficulty of the task might mean temporarily bypassing the Senate’s constitutional role in ratifying treaties by enforcing certain aspects of a new deal on an executive levels and a “provisional basis” until the Senate ratifies the treaty.
“The most ideal situation would be to finish it in time that it could be submitted to the Senate so that it can be ratified,” said White House Coordinator for Weapons of Mass Destruction, Security and Arms Control Gary Samore. “If we’re not able to do that, we’ll have to look at arrangements to continue some of the inspection provisions, keep them enforced in a provisional basis, while the Senate considers the treaty.”
Samore said administration lawyers are exploring the “different options that are available. One option is that both sides could agree to continue the inspections by executive agreement; that would work on our side. On the Russian side, as I understand it, that would require Duma approval.”
The fact that the administration is preparing for such an extraordinary measure shows just how much pressure the two administrations are under to arrive at an agreement before the 18-year-old treaty expires.
Uh, pardon me, but how many seats in the Senate does Obama’s party hold? Isn’t it 60? If Obama is simply moving forward with a straightforward, supportable treaty with Russia to reduce nuclear stockpiles in an effective verification system, why couldn’t he get a quick ratification? The GOP gave George H. W. Bush enough support in 1991 to pass the original START treaty, so it’s not as if ratification would be impossibly complicated.
Well, that is, if the deal actually does put in place an effective verification system and doesn’t amount to a de facto unilateral disarmament. With exactly five months to win Senate approval, the effort by the Obama White House in floating this idea now makes it sound like Obama wants to give away the store in order to score some points with his 1980s no-nukes agenda. And as much as the Democrats howled over the supposed devotion of George Bush to a “unitary executive,” Obama seems to have no trouble bypassing the check on executive power for treaty negotiation written explicitly into the Constitution, in Article II, Section 2:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;
Words. Just words.
I don't believe there is one dayum word in the Constitution that Barack Hussein Obama believes he has to abide by.
I'm REALLY getting sick of this...seems like every single day. Where are all thost people who screamed about Bush "shredding the Constitution"?
80% of the people who are against this kind of mess, are sitting back, waiting on somebody else to do something about it...If YOU are one of those waiting for someone else to do the heavy lifting, then SHAME ON YOU!
If you refuse to get up off the couch, refuse to call or write our representatives, refuse to show up when needed, you'll wake up one day and it will be too late. You'll be one of those sitting around, like the people in Cuba, and Venezuela asking "How did this happen?"
If you want to have a voice in the direction of this state and this country, I suggest you go to www.ncfreedom.us
Information is available on what you can do, what's coming up in both the state and federal governments. Don't sit back and let someone else do the heavy-lifting for you. Our founding fathers didn't...
Join us for the National Tea Party in DC in September. More info coming soon...
Filed under: Politics
23 Comments
(26 votes) poll: people don't trust politicians
(25 votes) raleigh man, 39, dies in mo-ped crash
(20 votes) holiday speed enforcement campaign under way



































Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
GOLO member since September 16, 2008
July 5, 2009 4:35 p.m.
I am not sure if that is funny, or sad. The USSR requires debate; on the other hand, in the US, the POTUS can just ram it thru.
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
July 5, 2009 4:44 p.m.
GOLO member since January 20, 2008
July 5, 2009 4:48 p.m.
GOLO member since January 31, 2008
July 5, 2009 4:52 p.m.
GOLO member since November 3, 2008
July 5, 2009 5:15 p.m.
The above is interesting reading. I had to re-educate myself. Currently, the Democrats have a 2/3 supermajority of both houses. They are free to ammend the constitution. The only way to prevent the ammendment is by not having a 2/3 majority of the states to ratify it. We better start getting our voter base educated.
GOLO member since November 3, 2008
July 5, 2009 5:20 p.m.
Interesting link.
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
July 5, 2009 5:27 p.m.
A slight correction in your last statement. The senate does NOT have a 2/3 majority. They only have 60 seats and they would need 67 for a 2/3 majority!
GOLO member since March 2, 2009
July 5, 2009 5:31 p.m.
IMO, this story is to test how much opposition there would be to the idea of circumventing the Constitution. It has nothing to do with this paticular treaty.
GOLO member since July 17, 2007
July 5, 2009 5:34 p.m.
Maybe not on Dec 6th but Russia doesn't believe the Cold War has ended. There's plenty of 'old school KGB' still in power in Russia and I'm sure they know B.O. is a fool in over his head.
GOLO member since January 20, 2008
July 5, 2009 5:39 p.m.
Please log in to add comment.