theadmiral: blog 
theadmiral's blog
n.c. house agrees to tax package as part of budget
Published Jun. 12, 2009Views: 136
The House voted 64-52 in favor of higher sales and income taxes, as well as increases on liquor and movies.
---
Since I am unemployed, the tax I pay for sales is nearly zero, since I have no income, I don't get to pay Income Taxes. I have all the liquor that I need for a few years, and I very rarely will attend a movie.
And this just adds to my contention that whomever voted for this provision is replaced the next election.
Filed under: Consumer
close![[no avatar]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/presentation/v1/images/golo/noavatar.gif){kind=avatar}
Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
Do we just have complete morons in office or what..... yet your wrong. The same voters who beleive the "democrats are gods" and do no evil... will vote for the next set just because what? they are democrats. I have a table full I sit with at lunch who will say "It doesn't matter what their platform is.. they are democrats, I only vote for democrats".
THANKS Azzhats. (Not that I think a republican would have done anything except cower)
GOLO member since December 18, 2007
June 12, 2009 6:55 a.m.
GOLO member since October 18, 2007
June 12, 2009 7:04 a.m.
What's that old saying about unintended consequences?
GOLO member since October 16, 2007
June 12, 2009 7:29 a.m.
Good thing I have a couple of horses, it may come down to either riding them or eating them.
GOLO member since January 3, 2008
June 12, 2009 7:31 a.m.
There is more than one way to skin a cat.
GOLO member since September 20, 2007
June 12, 2009 7:42 a.m.
GOLO member since December 11, 2007
June 12, 2009 7:48 a.m.
While this is true and I completely agree with the sentiment (who IS John Galt anyway...), I see people suggest WE change in reaction to the government.
Why should that be the case?
Why should we merely acquiesce to the looters in office?
When did the 'wisdom' of elected theives become the generally accepted rule?
How did the population come to view government as the arbiter of what THEY think is right and good instead of the defender of what We the People KNOW to be right and good?
I hold little confidence that any electoral process will put the necessay restrictions back onto the government.
Sadly, I expect the system to continue to further degrade into a statist regime until it either implodes or gets forcibly removed.
The question is this: How bad will the suffering be in this country before the populace gets the motivation to do something about their tyrannical government?
GOLO member since May 15, 2009
June 12, 2009 7:53 a.m.
GOLO member since October 16, 2007
June 12, 2009 7:59 a.m.
Taxes aren't the the point they will create an underround economy yet - but they probably will get there before too long. That's why Obama is concentrating on excise taxes - they hit the poor and middle class hardest (which is where the money is) and are harder to cheat on.
GOLO member since July 17, 2007
June 12, 2009 8:09 a.m.
They think nothing of irresponsible spending, wasting tax dollars, providing free education and healthcare to illegals, etc... and then they just turn around and claim to be broke.
All levels of govt are out of control!!!
GOLO member since January 20, 2008
June 12, 2009 8:16 a.m.
Please log in to add comment.