idareyou55: blog idareyou55's blog
in blow to bush, judge orders 17 guantánamo detainees freed
Published Oct. 8, 2008WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Bush administration to release 17 detainees at Guantánamo Bay by the end of the week, the first such ruling in nearly seven years of legal disputes over the administration’s detention policies.
The judge, Ricardo M. Urbina of Federal District Court, ordered that the 17 men be brought to his courtroom on Friday from the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where they have been held since 2002. He indicated that he would release the men, members of the restive Uighur Muslim minority in western China, into the care of supporters in the United States, initially in the Washington area.
“I think the moment has arrived for the court to shine the light of constitutionality on the reasons for detention,” Judge Urbina said.
Saying the men had never fought the United States and were not a security threat, he tersely rejected Bush administration claims that he lacked the power to order the men set free in the United States and government requests that he stay his order to permit an immediate appeal.
The ruling was a sharp setback for the administration, which has waged a long legal battle to defend its policies of detention at the naval base at Guantánamo Bay, arguing a broad executive power in waging war. Federal courts up to the Supreme Court have waded through detention questions and in several major cases the courts have rejected administration contentions.
The government recently conceded that it would no longer try to prove that the Uighurs were enemy combatants, the classification it uses to detain people at Guantánamo, where 255 men are now held. But it has fought efforts by lawyers for the men to have them released into the United States, saying the Uighurs admitted to receiving weapons training in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan at the time of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The White House press secretary, Dana Perino, said the administration was “deeply concerned by, and strongly disagrees with” the decision. She added that the ruling, “if allowed to stand, could be used as precedent for other detainees held at Guantánamo Bay, including sworn enemies of the United States suspected of planning the attacks of 9/11, who may also seek release into our country.”
Justice Department lawyers said they were filing an emergency application on Tuesday night for a stay from the federal appeals court in Washington.
Judge Urbina’s decision came in a habeas corpus lawsuit authorized by a landmark Supreme Court ruling in June that gave detainees the right to have federal judges review the reason for their detention. Speaking from the bench in a courtroom crowded with Uighur supporters of the detainees, Judge Urbina suggested that the government was seeking a stay as a tactic to keep the men imprisoned.
“All of this means more delay,” he said with evident impatience, “and delay is the name of the game up until this point.” The centuries-old doctrine of habeas corpus permits a judge to demand production of a prisoner, a power Judge Urbina sought to exercise with his order that the men be brought to him.
“I want to see the individuals,” he said.
The Uighurs have long been at the center of contentious legal cases because they said they were swept into detention in Afghanistan in 2001 by mistake. They said they were in Afghanistan to seek refuge from China, where the Uighurs, Turkic Muslims, often bridle at Han Chinese rule.
The Bush administration has fought the Uighurs in court for years, contending that their encampment in Afghanistan had ties to a Uighur terror group. Last summer, a federal appeals court ridiculed as inadequate the government’s secret evidence for holding one of the men. In the months since, the government has said that it would “serve no useful purpose” to continue to try to prove that any of these 17 men were enemy combatants.
Read more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/08/washington/08detain.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
12 Comments
(12 votes) gunman shoots raleigh pizza parlor employee
(11 votes) gas prices getting pumped up again
(9 votes) two marines accused of shooting horse
(4 votes) army ranger killed in iraq
(3 votes) camp lejeune marine dies at kuwait base








































Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
Well good I say make sure you move them in next foor to the judge who released them. Let him be responsible for keeping an eye out on them.
GOLO member since July 7, 2007
October 8, 2008 8:56 a.m.
GOLO member since July 7, 2007
October 8, 2008 8:51 a.m.
The *US MILITARY* deemed these people were NLEC (no longer enemy combatants) in 2004. Therefore, they should be released. Understand? Are you going to slam the US military now?
The problem is that they are seeking independence from CHINA and they will be persecuted/tortured if returned to China. That allows them to claim political asylum. No other country will take them since the US created the problem.
The civil court didn't decide these people were not terrorists - THE MILITARY DID. The court did decide that you can't hold them in a prison having been deemed NLEC. Get it?
Keep on living on planet Naivitee, people.
GOLO member since October 7, 2007
October 8, 2008 8:34 a.m.
GOLO member since November 25, 2007
October 8, 2008 8:27 a.m.
GOLO member since July 22, 2007
October 8, 2008 8:23 a.m.
GOLO member since October 17, 2007
October 8, 2008 8:09 a.m.
GOLO member since October 18, 2007
October 8, 2008 7:43 a.m.
GOLO member since September 15, 2007
October 8, 2008 7:26 a.m.
GOLO member since February 2, 2008
October 8, 2008 7:11 a.m.
GOLO member since August 28, 2008
October 8, 2008 6:11 a.m.
Please log in to add comment.