photoshop phanatics: blog 
photoshop phanatics' blog
photoshop phanatics
by faith trust and pixie dustPublished Oct. 3, 2008
so, I had my first semi-professional/paid edit...the image in the blog is the original...here is the outcomes...
It is one of my coworkers who just got married. He only wanted one pose.
http://www.wral.com/golo/image_gallery/3668506/?version=slideshow
These backgrounds were chosen by the groom..
Please, Please, Please comment...Let me know what you think.
close31 Comments
top-voted stories
(1 votes) repaving i-795 could cost up to $22m
(1 votes) homebuilders feel economic pinch
(1 votes) workplace deaths on rise
most recent
Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
GOLO member since November 23, 2007
October 3, 2008 5:16 p.m.
October 3, 2008 4:31 p.m.
just food for thought that you might want to get proper written documentation that its ok to manipulate the photographer's work. as a professional photographer, i've seen lots of fellow photographers take this kind of stuff to court.
GOLO member since November 15, 2007
October 3, 2008 4:31 p.m.
GOOD LORD!
All the backgrounds stink. The groom obviously isn't a graphic designer.
Why not just put them in front of a beach background or Photoshop out the minister and that photographer. Or, do get the photos from the other photographer so you can at least start with a good photo. The original image is too crowded.
GOLO member since August 29, 2008
October 3, 2008 4:29 p.m.
Also, you may want to lighten the people a little. could be my screen though.
GOLO member since September 23, 2007
October 3, 2008 4:01 p.m.
October 3, 2008 3:56 p.m.
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
October 3, 2008 3:55 p.m.
I am suspicious of any man who wants a "sparkley" anything! LOL
October 3, 2008 3:55 p.m.
GOLO member since July 3, 2007
October 3, 2008 3:54 p.m.
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
October 3, 2008 3:54 p.m.
Please log in to add comment.