ryoung: blog ryoung5367's blog
the liberty agenda for north carolina
Published Sep. 18, 2008
We, Libertarian candidates for North Carolina General Assembly, pledge that our priority while in office will be to put Freedom First for all the state's citizens. This Agenda fully supports the campaign agenda of Mike Munger, Libertarian candidate for Governor of North Carolina.
1. Ending forced annexation and stopping private property seizure under the power of eminent domain by amending the state constitution.
Forced annexation and the seizure of private property for ostensible "public purpose" is a violation of the fundamental rights of all Americans. Forced annexation is not about providing services, or controlling growth. Forced annexation is about money. Communities should only be annexed with their consent. No government, at any level, should have the power to take or seize private property for any purpose, without the express consent of the owner and without just compensation..
2. Improving public education through school choice and competition.
We agree with Mike Munger, Libertarian candidate for governor, that it has become fashionable to bash public education rather than sincerely seek ways to improve it. There are many good things happening in North Carolina education, and the path to continued improvement is to foster choice.
The problem is that anyone who proposes thinking out of the box when it comes to education is beat over the head with the supposed public school mandate in the state constitution.
This selective devotion to constitutional principle is curious, since the legislature freely ignores other parts of the constitution, including the part that says 'all elections shall be free, fair, and open' by restricting the right of people to vote for anyone other than Democrats and Republicans.
3. Restoring free, fair and open elections to North Carolina by removing barriers to ballot access.
North Carolina has arguably the most restrictive ballot access laws in the nation. These barriers are specifically designed by the Democratic-Republican duopoly to restrict the people's freedom of choice, prevent independent and third party candidates from getting on the ballot. Elections laws also are used to restrict free speech, by limiting how much an individual can contribute to the candidate of their choice. The people should have the unregulated and unrestricted right vote for and support candidates of their choice.
4. Cutting off all corporate welfare and subsidies.
Economic incentives and subsidies, more properly called corporate welfare, are an immoral tax on individuals for the benefit of corporate profits. Recent news reports that the Dell computer company may sell their three year old Winston-Salem plant, built with nearly $300 million in corporate welfare, demonstrate that corporate incentives are ineffective as well as immoral.
Conclusion
Ending property theft by government, improving education, restoring fair elections, and cutting off corporate welfare only the beginning of the Liberty Agenda. Our goal and our pledge is to reduce the size, scope and power of government at all levels and on all issues, and consistently oppose any increase in the size, scope and power of government at any level, for any purpose.
/signed/
Kira Howe, Senate 7
Brian Irving, Senate 17
David Rollins, Senate 20
Richard Evey, Senate 44
Jesse Mignogna, House 2
Sean Haugh, House 30
Barbara Howe, House 32
Susan Hogarth, House 38
Robert Richmond, House 71
T.J. Rohr, House 87
Jeffrey Ober, House 95
Lawrence Hollar, House 96
Keith Calvelli, House 108
7 Comments
(2 votes) relatives fear mom, boy dead
(1 votes) repaving i-795 could cost up to $22m
(1 votes) homebuilders feel economic pinch
(1 votes) workplace deaths on rise


































Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
GOLO member since January 17, 2008
September 18, 2008 4:59 p.m.
GOLO member since August 22, 2008
September 18, 2008 4:27 p.m.
GOLO member since August 22, 2008
September 18, 2008 4:23 p.m.
To move further, I fail to see how annexation can be viewed as forcible seizure of property. Agreed that the sole purpose of annexation is to increase the revenue of a given government body, however, compensation is in the form of civil services. Who would want to live without the 'modern conveniences' such as sanitary sewer, police, fire, and ambulance service?
Only a fool.
GOLO member since September 5, 2007
September 18, 2008 4:23 p.m.
I feel we are reaching a point where both parties will lose enough support to give a third party a legitimate shot at making real changes.
GOLO member since October 17, 2007
September 18, 2008 4:17 p.m.
GOLO member since September 1, 2007
September 18, 2008 4:15 p.m.
GOLO member since August 22, 2008
September 18, 2008 4:14 p.m.
Please log in to add comment.