tmedlin: blog tmedlin's blog
...cheering the palin pick
Published Aug. 30, 2008Conservatives are thrilled with the selection of Sarah Palin as John McCain's running-mate. Scroll through the postings at RobinsonandLong.com, or listen to the hosts and callers on any of the talk shows today.
There are six reasons, all of them huge and enduring.
First, over the past month we have gone from hoping Senator McCain would win to thinking he might actually be able to win. With the selection of Governor Palin most of us are convinced he will win. Which means the country will be well led on the war for at least another four crucial years. The reason behind this new confidence leads us to the second factor.
Sarah Palin is a real deal conservative, down the line, on all of the issues. This has the immediate effect of energizing the base to battle to keep the White House and to close the gap in or take back the House of Representatives. It is especially important that she is ardently pro-life, and the story of her family is certain to resonate with those values voters who prize faith and family as the center of life.
Third, the Palin pick guarantees that the party will remain a conservative party long-term. If Senator McCain had picked a pro-choice Republican or had asked his friend and great American Joe Lieberman to run with him, the party would truly have been split. That didn't happen, and Matt Cunningham summarizes the response among conservatives party activists:
McCain took a major step forward in exciting the GOP's conservative base at Rick Warren's forum. For example, I spoke with a prominent local conservative activist who was so enthused by McCain's performance who bought a plane ticket for Minneapolis the next.
The Palin choice boosts and accelerates that process. Like me, Palin is 44 years old. She came of age politically during the Age of Ronald Reagan. To a conservative movement that has grown tired and enervated, she has demonstrated you can run, win and successfully govern on conservative principles in the face of the government-accommodating Republicanism that has infected so much of the party.
Fourth, the GOP already owned the energy issue and and the energy issue dominates and will continue to dominate the next 60 days. Even if Sarah Palin doesn't persuade John McCain to come out for exploring ANWR now, a vigorous exploration/conservation strategy has an ideal spokesperson in Palin.
Fifth, she is not a Beltway Republican. The modern GOP is the party of Reagan and Bush --both westerners, and very outside-the-Beltway. Neither ever succumbed to the Beltway's many poisons.
John McCain is clearly outside of his party's recent tradition, much more of the Eisenhower, above-partisanship nationalist than the movement conservative, comfortable as a Beltway big, on easy terms with the permanent political elite of the country from both parties and the Beltway-Manhattan media elite.
McCain, of course, understands the war and is the steel for the next crucial few years of resolve that victory in the war requires. A Vice President Palin will be a voice for the conservative movement in the Administration and for the party outside of the Beltway. The long run of Congressional power drained a lot of the energy from the GOP when it came to the battle of ideas, and Palin is a representative of the non-Beltway GOP that wants very much to get back into that fray. Winning the war remains the first priority, and Supreme Court justices after that, but on a host of key issues Governor Palin represents the reagan wing of the party, and that's a great thing.
Sixth and finally, she is young enough to be a bridge to the next generation, and with five kids, she has been living in the world of young moms and technology-dependent teens. This advantage will be hard to quantify, but when she is out on the trail talking about her kids and her family's path, it will be a huge counterpoint to the Obama's narrative, one that underscores that millions of American families are conservative, traditional, proud of their country and full of optimism about the future if the government's burdens do not grow to large and the country's enemies are kept in retreat.
There is a lot of enthusiasm out there, and given these reasons, it will endure until November.
by Hugh Hewitt
www.townhall.com
37 Comments
(10 votes) disabled vets' dogs find homes
(1 votes) snow flurries possible friday morning


































Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
GOLO member since February 2, 2008
August 30, 2008 7:22 p.m.
Too funny. Someone wants government out their their bedroom and therefore votes for someone who resists abortion rights. It's amazing how some people don't see how they are contradicting themselves...
GOLO member since October 12, 2007
August 30, 2008 6:52 p.m.
Clinton lost because her campaign made many mistakes. Not putting any efforts into the late February and early March caucuses was one of her biggest mistakes since it gave Obama momentum that enabled him to take a huge lead.
If Democratic women vote for McCain because he has a female vice presidential candidate, they have thrown away all their Democratic values just to elect a woman as vice president. That's sexist, plain and simple.
GOLO member since October 12, 2007
August 30, 2008 6:26 p.m.
"All of that aside, I simply don't agree with her politics."
AND WHAT WOULD THOSE POLITICS BE THAT YOU DISAGREE WITH, SPECIFICALLY.
"I also do not think that any woman who DOES agree with Hillary's politics will vote for McCain now just because Palin is on the ticket."
CNN IS ON THE RECORD TODAY WITH A POLL STATING THAT MANY ARE NOW SHIFTING COURSE, AND NOT JUST WOMEN.
"Only women who are obsessed with having a woman in the White House will do that, and they're nuttier than squirrel poo anyway."
WHO EXACTLY ARE YOU INCLUDING IN THE SQUIRREL POO?
God bless.
Rev. RB
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
August 30, 2008 4:02 p.m.
OK, let's get this clarified right now.
(1)-There is one alleged scandal, not a couple.
(2)-There is proof substantiating that the decision to fire her BIL did not come from her office.
(3)-Her BIL, who was an Alaskan LEO was caught under the influence while on the job and had been under heavy criticism for tasing an 11 year old. Now those are two things no LEO, whether related to a state governor or not, could get away with in any state in this country, or perhaps the world.
So now that that's clarified, what other gossip would you like to spread without sharing ALL of the facts???
God bless.
Rev. RB
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
August 30, 2008 3:59 p.m.
GOLO member since November 7, 2007
August 30, 2008 3:49 p.m.
GOLO member since July 2, 2007
August 30, 2008 3:19 p.m.
That depends perspective, I guess. For those of us social moderates who were thinking McCain was a breath of fresh air for the GOP, Palin gives me pause to think if I'll be able to support my ticket again this election cycle and REALLY gives DEMS the ammunition they need to chant "4 more years of Bush"...sorry really not seeing this as a shrewd move.
GOLO member since November 21, 2007
August 30, 2008 3:12 p.m.
Shows no one ready my fcomments or you would have caught that. Thanks. I meant second amendment
GOLO member since July 7, 2007
August 30, 2008 2:38 p.m.
GOLO member since August 22, 2007
August 30, 2008 2:12 p.m.
Please log in to add comment.