tmedlin: blog tmedlin's blog
dems approve amnesty for 1.35 million illegals! you will be shocked when you read this!
Published May. 17, 2008What were the compelling interests that led the august Senate Appropriations Committee to include major legislation as part of the military spending bill on Thursday? Amnesty for illegal aliens, and lots of new foreign workers for powerful business interests.
In one afternoon, the Appropriations Committee approved amnesty for 1.35 million illegal alien agricultural workers, and made available an additional 650,000 skilled and unskilled foreign guest workers over the next three years. That’s 2 million new, or newly legalized, foreign workers entering our labor force over the next three years – even as our economy has been losing jobs.
The 2 million figure does not include the dependents of the amnesty recipients or new workers who could be admitted under existing agricultural guest worker programs. Under the agricultural amnesty – written by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) at the behest of the California agricultural lobby – the spouses of amnesty recipients will also be authorized to compete with American workers for jobs in any sector of our labor market. Nor does it include the potentially unlimited number of new guest workers agricultural employers will be able to import under a “streamlined” H-2A program that requires the Department of Labor to issue visas within seven days of an employer’s request. (hello? what about our national security - you KNOW the feds can't do thorough background checks in 7 days!)
Just to be extra sure that the agriculture industry will get their workers as cheaply as possible, Sen. Feinstein threw in a provision that freezes wages for these farm workers at 2007 levels. (Doesn't this sound a little like EXPLOITATION to you?)
While the Feinstein amendment offers senators a fig leaf to avoid the dreaded “A-Word” (that’s A-M-N-E-S-T-Y) by legalizing these workers for only five years, the sunset provision is sheer kabuki theater. Everyone knows that once we start down that road there is no turning back. At some point in the next five years, the “temporary” amnesty will be made a permanent one and will likely include many other categories of illegal aliens – just to be fair to everyone who broke our laws.
California agriculture is not the only business interest powerful enough to hitch a ride on the backs of our military personnel. The Maryland fishing and tourism industries also want a ready supply of cheap foreign labor, and Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) was happy to accommodate by offering an amendment that exempts returning unskilled or low-skilled H-2B workers from counting against the caps for that category. (Never mind that there are fewer Maryland crabs to harvest each year, and that with the skyrocketing price of gas people may not be able to afford to drive to the Eastern Shore.) Over the next three years, the cumulative number of H-2B workers admitted could reach 432,000.
And while the Appropriations Committee was piling on goodies for the low-skill industries, they found time to take care of the lobbyists for the high tech industry as well. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Microsoft/Wash.) added a provision to “recapture” 218,000 visas for skilled foreign workers. These visas didn’t really “escape,” so much as they just went unutilized between 1996 and 2004, especially during the years immediately after the high tech bubble burst. But now high tech employers and labor contractors want those visas back, because foreign guest workers tamp down labor costs for the industry.
Americans, no matter what they might think of the war in Iraq, genuinely support our men and women who are over there serving our nation. It seems that the members of the Senate Appropriations Committee love our troops too – but for entirely different reasons: they provide convenient cover for passing special interest legislation to benefit illegal aliens and powerful business lobbies.
39 Comments
(50 votes) second-grader left by bus driver
(10 votes) police tightlipped on sanford teen's death
































Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.
You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.
GOLO member since October 18, 2007
May 17, 2008 1:56 p.m.
GOLO member since April 10, 2008
May 17, 2008 12:53 p.m.
May 17, 2008 12:10 p.m.
GOLO member since April 10, 2008
May 17, 2008 11:52 a.m.
GOLO member since August 4, 2007
May 17, 2008 10:59 a.m.
It does. It is less efficient and the oil required to produce it makes it a net wash as far as "greenhouse gases".
If the dems really want to improve our "image" in the world, they could start by deciding we won't starve people to death in order to avoid pumping our own oil.
GOLO member since July 17, 2007
May 17, 2008 10:56 a.m.
Yes, you are quite correct; that Farm Bill was not good for taxpayers; unless of course you happened to be on the receiving end of the gravy from that farm bill.
GOLO member since October 18, 2007
May 17, 2008 10:54 a.m.
I am with you on that; we are seeing more and more news stories about food riots in other countries. We are extremely fortunate to live in a country that does not have food shortages; at least not yet. It is a simple fact; on a global basis there is not enough food available to sustain the world population. I am not even sure there is enough "farm land" available to even produce the amount of food that is actually needed. Utilizing farm land to produce bio-mass for fuel is just terrible policy. Add to that, in the case of Ethanol it is my understanding that it produces worse air-quality issues than burning gasoline.
GOLO member since October 18, 2007
May 17, 2008 10:48 a.m.
GOLO member since April 10, 2008
May 17, 2008 10:45 a.m.
GOLO member since April 10, 2008
May 17, 2008 10:41 a.m.
Please log in to add comment.