Federal grand jury looks into Duke Energy spill

Posted March 18, 2014

— A federal grand jury convened Tuesday as part of a widening criminal investigation triggered by the massive Duke Energy coal ash spill that coated 70 miles of the Dan River with toxic sludge.

The session at the federal courthouse in Raleigh comes as environmental groups amp up pressure on regulators and lawmakers to force Duke to clean up the leaky, unlined ash pits polluting North Carolina's waterways. Prosecutors have issued at least 23 grand jury subpoenas to Duke executives and state officials.

Other political corruption investigations have taken months or years before going before a grand jury, but U.S. Attorney Thomas Walker chose to present information to a grand jury upfront rather than wait for investigators to compile the details.

Walker declined to comment, citing the secrecy of grand jury proceedings.

The subpoenas seek records from Duke, the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the state Utilities Commission. They include reams of documents, including emails, memos and reports, related to the Feb. 2 spill into the Dan River and the state's oversight of the company's nearly three dozen other coal ash dumps spread out at 14 current and retired power plants.

The first batch of subpoenas was issued Feb. 10, the day after an Associated Press story raised questions about whether North Carolina regulators had helped shield Duke from a coalition of environmental groups that wanted to sue under the U.S. Clean Water Act to force the company to clean up its coal ash pollution.

Their efforts were stymied by the state environmental agency, which used its authority under the federal act to intervene. The state quickly proposed what environmentalists derided as a "sweetheart deal" where the $50 billion Charlotte-based company would have paid $99,111 to settle violations over toxic groundwater leeching from two of its plants with no requirement that it stop the pollution.

That proposed settlement was put on hold indefinitely after last month's spill.

DENR spokesman Jamie Kritzer declined to comment beyond saying the agency is cooperating with the federal probe. Duke officials took a similar position.

Environmentalists had long complained about the level of coordination between Duke and North Carolina's regulators and lawmakers.

Gov. Pat McCrory, a Republican, worked for Duke for more than 28 years before retiring to campaign for the state's highest elected post.

"Duke has been polluting for decades, and they've known they're polluting for decades, and they're simply allowed to act above the law," said Peter Harrison, an attorney with Waterkeeper Alliance, and environmental group that was demonstrating outside the federal courthouse.

"The state has also known about Duke's illegal pollution for years, and they haven't done anything and we're talking about crimes now," Harrison said. "If this was a small business in North Carolina, they would be held accountable."

Bob Phillips, executive director of good-government watchdog group North Carolina Common Cause, agreed that Duke's power and influence affect how regulators deal with the company.

"Our hope in this federal investigation is that this will pull back the curtain on what role big-money politics plays in North Carolina," Phillips said.

Following the spill, McCrory and DENR Secretary John Skvarla asked Duke for details about company plans to clean up the coal ash dumps.

Duke President and Chief Executive Lynn Good responded last week. She said it would take the company at least two years to clean up the Eden dump, which spilled the ash into the Dan River. She said the company will move its remaining ash away from the river to either a lined landfill or a "lined structural fill solution."

Good said the company will be responsible for cleaning up after the disaster, though it is not clear how the miles of contaminated river bottom might be restored or how long that might take. Public health officials have advised people to avoid contact with the water in the Dan and not to eat the fish.

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe toured the water treatment plant in Danville, Va., about 25 miles downstream from the spill, on Tuesday and said that he expects Duke to reimburse his state for any costs associated with the spill. Utility executives have assured him they will, he said.

Good said the company will also move ash dumps in the Asheville and Charlotte area, and is looking at options for ash pits near Wilmington. The company will continue to work on long-range plans for 11 other sites where the company has leaky, unlined ash pits, she said.

Skvarla called the plan inadequate, saying he wanted more answers from Duke.

He said regulators plan to modify permits at Charlotte and Asheville area ash pits to stop pollution from seeping into public waterways. Skvarla said regulators want to stop all unauthorized discharges from those leaky ash dumps, and possibly move the waste.

But Southern Environmental Law Center senior attorney Frank Holleman said the state is dragging its feet. He said the agency had the power to force Duke to clean up the sites.

Meanwhile, more North Carolina lawmakers are calling on Duke to take action.

State Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger, a Rockingham County Republican who lives near the Dan River spill site, said he wants the General Assembly's Environmental Review Commission to look into the issue to make sure that it "never happens again."

"As a resident of Eden, I have personally experienced the impact and understand the gravity of the recent coal ash spill," he said.

He noted that Senate Rules Chairman Tom Apodaca announced last month he is drafting a bill to require Duke to clean up the other coal ash ponds.

The co-chairman of the commission that would consider the legislation, Rep. Mike Hager, R-Rutherford, is a retired Duke engineer who ran the five coal-fired generators at the company's Cliffside Steam Station.

In another development, North Carolina regulators say they are investigating whether Duke broke the law when workers pumped contaminated water from a coal ash dump near the Cape Fear River.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • djbyrdnc Mar 19, 2014

    I know McCoy has some questions to answer, but who was in charge when the Power and Duke merged? There were problems in 2009, who was in charge? Here is the real deal, both the D's and the R's will pin it on the tax payers or rate payers. So quit playing the political game.

  • Rip Arrowood Mar 19, 2014
    user avatar

    In the history of Democrats governing NC, there has never been a DENR ombudsman (Joseph Harwood), a DENR Communication Director (Drew Elliott), a former economic adviser (Tony Almeida), a Commerce Secretary (Sharon Decker), an Office of State Human Resources Director (Neal Alexander) who are all ex- Duke Energy employees and shareholders appointed by the governor - another Duke Energy ex-employee. There's also an elected Representative (Mike Hager) an ex Duke Energy employee who sits on or chairs Energy, Environmental, Utilities and Regulatory Committees.....why do some people wonder why there is a Federal Criminal Investigation?

  • 61babygirl29 Mar 19, 2014

    and tell me why the customers will have to pay for clean up of the spill and not the shareholders? Geez....

  • Djofraleigh Anderson Mar 19, 2014
    user avatar

    Since the rules & regulations were all done and exercised by Democrats for over 50 years the ash ponds were created, the Grand Jury is going to have to subpoena ALL living governors, current & former leaders of the general assemblies. I love it. Who appoints the utilities commissioners? There is no question that lobbying works, has effect, but is it criminal?

  • Pensive01 Mar 19, 2014

    View quoted thread

    Those who make such claims also tend to "forget" that the republicans had majority control of the House, back in the mid to late 1990's, as well as joint control with the democrats back in 2003. Oddly enough they also seem to "forget" Governors Holshouser and Martin, both of whom were also republicans. In fact 100+ years also covers quite a few governors, as well as legislators, who were in the Republican party, the Conservative party, the National Union party and so on.

  • Pensive01 Mar 19, 2014

    View quoted thread

    1985 is a bit dated, especially as the EPA has more current standards for Arsenic toxicity. In fact the maximum contaminate level, as in the highest amount that is considered safe, is 10 parts per billion, ppb for short . Water that was tested at the site of the spill indicated that Arsenic was present at 350 ppb. Even DENR's test results, from a location miles downstream, got back a reading of 40 ppb, which is not as bad as 350 ppb but still well over the limit of 10 ppb. Other heavy metal contaminates, such as chromium and mercury, are just as elevated well above what can be found in an average soil sample.

  • Chris Holder Mar 19, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    And 30 years later, we have reached much different conclusion.

    Don't you remember? Smoking is good for you!!

  • Michael Hart Mar 19, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    and yet you still lie...hmmm go figure
    I have provided proof to you time and time again that technically speaking the Political makeup has changed between the two party's and that the statement "Dems have been in power for 100 years: is false and for this we deem your comment "liar, Liar Pants are on fire" and also give you 100 Pinocchio's!

  • Michael Hart Mar 19, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    woodchipper doesn't even realize that the statement was made some 30 YEARS AGO..... I love the Cons, they try to use facts and can't seem to understand them........ Typical sheep, using talking points before the overlords tell them to....

  • schismatic Mar 19, 2014

    View quoted thread

    About five minutes of research on the EPA's web site provided me with this information:
    Typical background concentration of arsenic in soils is about 10 mg/kg. The concentration of arsenic in the coal ash pond is about 60 mg/kg.
    I'm not a progressive, but I can't process those basic facts about coal ash because they're not facts.