Education

Expelled student's attorney criticizes Duke investigation into sex assault claim

Posted December 16, 2014

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— A contractor who looked into a Duke University student's allegations that a student-athlete sexually assaulted her was "incompetent, capricious and lacked fundamental fairness," according to an amended lawsuit filed Monday by an attorney for the man, who was denied his diploma because of the claim.

Neither Duke University police nor Durham police charged Lewis McLeod – a soccer player and psychology major from Australia – in the November 2013 case, but the university's Office of Student Conduct found him guilty of sexual assault and expelled him just before his May 10 graduation.

According to the 77-page amended complaint, that decision was based partially on an investigation by Dr. Celia Irvine, a Chapel Hill psychologist whom Duke hired to conduct an independent investigation into the matter.

McLeod's attorney, Rachel Hitch, writes in the legal filing that Irvine was not licensed under North Carolina law to carry out such a task and that her work was "negligent, reckless, biased, erroneous, incomplete …"

Keith Lawrence, Duke's executive director of news and communications, declined to comment on the lawsuit Tuesday, saying it is a pending legal matter.

Hitch argues that Irvine also wasn't qualified as an investigator and that she "lacked the knowledge, training and experience to conduct a fair and competent fact-finding investigation into the allegations."

Among Hitch's claims: Irvine failed to interview important witnesses and when she did, she did not properly document the interviews.

"Defendant Irvine's investigation and report were evidence relied upon by Duke University in making its erroneous finding that Plaintiff was responsible for sexual misconduct," Hitch writes.

McLeod was also “subjected to an unfair hearing” without an attorney and without any ability to cross-examine witnesses, Hitch maintains. A witness in support of McLeod was also sent home without any notice or explanation, she says.

Irvine was among several issues raised in the complaint, which seeks compensatory and punitive damages – each in excess of $25,000 – and asks for Duke to re-enroll McLeod so that he can get his degree.

McLeod has maintained that his encounter with the 18-year-old woman whom he met at a local bar was consensual – a key issue in the case – and that the woman "got emotional" and began to cry.

His student visa expired at the end of the semester, and without a job, he had to return to Australia. He also had a job offer from a Wall Street firm that was contingent upon him graduating.

5 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • flyfish42 Dec 17, 2014

    I have never understood why sexual assault victims don't report these incidents directly to the local police, who are equipped and trained to deal with them. I believe having the school carry out the investigation is just another way to try to protect their image. Duke of all schools should know better by now!

  • Larry Lynch Dec 17, 2014
    user avatar

    duke univer is the Last source of information one should look to based on their blatent, willful, rush to judgement methods used to destroy the duke lacrosse 3-- who would still be in jail today- if they were good ole north Carolina boys-- and the unified efforts of duke 88 professors and dick broadhead-- WHO HAS NEVER received demerit nor punishment for their roles in the last major sexual allegation scandals. but the question today is WILL WRAL ALLOW THIS BLOG TO GO THRU OR WILL THEY PRACTICE THE CENSORSHIP BUTTON? I stand by every statement I made an will gladly welcome any response from Duke U. legal or otherwise.

  • 12345_here Dec 17, 2014

    Duke is going to soon be paying people more to not attend the school than they will be getting in tuition/

  • 68_dodge_polara Dec 17, 2014

    Not surprising these days.

  • glarg Dec 17, 2014

    schools have to qualifications to be conducting these kinds of investigations. They have no training, they dont use recognized standards of evidence, and the block legal representation.

    They should be stripped of their ability to run these kangaroo courts.