Education law rewrite shifts more power to NC, other states
Posted December 10, 2015
Raleigh, N.C. — President Barack Obama signed a sweeping overhaul of the No Child Left Behind education law Thursday, meaning North Carolina public schools could see some major changes, including more money for teacher recruitment and a change in how teachers are evaluated.
One key feature remains: Students will still take federally required statewide reading and math exams. However, the new law encourages states to limit the time students spend on testing and diminishes the high stakes for underperforming schools.
Lou Fabrizio, director of data, research and federal policy for the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, said the rewrite of the law gives states more decision-making authority.
"The biggest impact is that, in the past, a lot of times things we had to do were because, quote, the federal government said we had to do it," Fabrizio said.
One of the things North Carolina will need to decide is whether students' test scores should be tied to teacher evaluations. Fabrizio says the state Board of Education and General Assembly "need to be coming to agreement" on that issue.
"We've got to get stakeholder input and get different groups weighing in," he added.
The rewrite of the law will bring more money to North Carolina and more than 30 other states to help schools in poor areas locate and retain good teachers. The "Every Student Succeeds Act" contains a provision pushed by Republican Sen. Richard Burr changing a formula to distribute teacher recruitment and training funds.
Burr's office said the reworked formula should mean an extra $24 million annually to North Carolina schools, phased in over seven years. That's a nearly 50 percent increase. Burr said in a release that Congress had "the obligation to properly fund schools that need this funding the most."
How exactly the overhaul will affect North Carolina might not be known for several months. The state will have to submit a plan to the U.S. Department of Education, and that plan could take as long as nine months to a year to put together, according to Fabrizio. Any new plan won’t be implemented until the 2017-18 school year.
"What I'm very happy about is that Congress is building in time for transitioning from the current system to the new system," Fabrizio said.
The overhaul ends more than a decade of what critics have derided as one-size-fits-all federal policies dictating accountability and improvement for the nation's 100,000 or so public schools.
The long-awaited bill to replace the 2002 No Child Left Behind law easily passed the Senate on Wednesday and the House last week, in a rare example of the Republican-controlled Congress and Obama finding common ground on major legislation. Obama held it up as an "example of how bipartisanship should work," noting that opposing sides had compromised to reach a deal.
"That's something that you don't always see here in Washington," Obama said. "There wasn't a lot of grandstanding, a lot of posturing, just a lot of good, hard work."
Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., who chairs the House's education panel, said under the new approach, American classrooms will no longer be "micromanaged" by the Education Department in Washington.
"Instead, parents, teachers, and state and local education leaders will regain control of their schools," said Kline, part of the bipartisan quartet that spearheaded the bill.
Here's how the major stakeholders fare:
The new law eliminates the federal mandate that teacher evaluations be tied to student performance on the statewide tests. Teachers' unions hated that idea, saying the high stakes associated with the tests were creating a culture of over-testing and detracting from the learning environment. States and districts will still be able, but not required, to link scores or consider them as a factor in teacher performance reviews.
Don't start applauding yet, kids. The nation's 50 million students in public schools will still have to take the federally mandated statewide reading and math exams in grades three to eight and once in high school — so parents, teachers and others can see how they are doing against a common measuring stick. But the law also encourages states to set caps on the amount of time students spend on testing.
More children from low- and moderate-income families will have access to preschool through a new grant program that is to use existing funding to support state efforts.
No more Common Core — maybe.
The law says the federal government may not mandate or give states incentives to adopt or maintain any particular set of academic standards, such as Common Core.
The college and career-ready curriculum guidelines were created by the states but became a flashpoint for those critical of Washington's influence in schools. The administration offered grants through its Race to the Top program for states that adopted strong academic standards for students.
Already, some states have begun backing away from Common Core.
The law provides for more transparency about test scores, meaning parents and others in the community will get a better look at how students in their states and in local schools are doing. It requires that test scores be broken down by race, family income and disability status.
Parents also will be able to see how per-pupil funding breaks down by state, district and school.
States and districts will now be responsible for coming up with their own goals for schools, designing their own measures of achievement and progress, and deciding independently how to turn around struggling schools. Testing will be one factor considered, but graduation rates and education atmosphere could also be factored in.
To make sure all children get a fair shot at a quality education, states will be required to intervene in the lowest-performing 5 percent of schools, in high schools with high dropout rates and in schools with stubborn achievement gaps.
DIMINISHED FEDERAL ROLE
The measure substantially limits the federal government's role, barring the Education Department from telling states and local districts how to assess school and teacher performance.
The measure also ends the waivers the Obama administration has given to more than 40 states — exemptions granted around the more onerous parts of No Child when it became clear that requirements such as having all students proficient in reading and math by 2014 would not be met.
Associated Press writers Darlene Superville and Josh Lederman contributed to this report.