Raleigh, N.C. — Glenwood Avenue in Raleigh is pretty quiet at mid-morning.
But it’s a different story at rush hour, especially in the section between Interstate 540 and Duraleigh Road.
“It’s frustrating because there’s always stop-and-go traffic,” motorist Liz Marshall said.
Before the state completed Interstate 40 in the late 1980s, Glenwood Avenue was the main route between Raleigh and Durham. Now, more than 45,000 vehicles a day cram into the four lanes on Glenwood between Duraleigh Road and I-540.
The state Department of Transportation has a plan to unclog the major artery – and it starts with a makeover that will turn that section into a “superstreet.”
A superstreet would keep traffic flowing by eliminating the need for drivers on side streets to wait for a green light so they can cross Glenwood Avenue .
Instead, those drivers would turn right onto Glenwood, make a U-turn, then turn right again to continue on the side street.
DOT engineer Jim Dunlop, who has been working on the project, said removing complex traffic signals at intersections would keep vehicles moving on Glenwood and cost less than adding lanes.
“If we can open up those signals, we gain back that capacity without having to do a lot of construction,” he said.
A similar superstreet project that opened on U.S. Highway 15-501 in Chapel Hill in 2008 reduced travel times by 65 percent, Dunlop said.
There is a superstreet project under way along the Highway 55 Bypass in Holly Springs that will accommodate traffic around a new shopping area set to open next year.
Dunlop said superstreets are new to this area, and drivers would have to get used to it. The project on Glenwood Avenue would cost $101.3 million, and construction would begin in 2020.
But Marshall says she's ready.
“I think it's a great idea,” she said. “It would free up some of the congestion. It would give us a little room to move.”
The public can learn more about the superstreet proposal at a public workshop from 4 to 7 p.m. Thursday at the Elks Lodge on Lead Mine Road.



![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2010/08/30/8212390/8362364-1286459151-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2007/07/30/1649447/1649447-1209833775-100x75.jpg)


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
December 5, 2012 5:50 p.m.
phys.org: "The so-called "superstreet" traffic design results in significantly faster travel times, and leads to a drastic reduction in automobile collisions and injuries, according to North Carolina State University researchers who have conducted the largest-ever study of superstreets and their impacts."
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2011-01-left-superstreet-traffic-safety.html
December 5, 2012 5:02 p.m.
How do you reconcile your statement with the following excerpt from the article?
"A similar superstreet project that opened on U.S. Highway 15-501 in Chapel Hill in 2008 reduced travel times by 65 percent, Dunlop said."
I live in Chapel Hill and admit that the interchange they put in there takes some getting used to, and it's still not my favorite thing to do, but it is set up to alleviate any issues with U-turns that people here seem to be in a panic over. Like most people, my initial reaction was "this is really dumb!", so I didn't pay close attention to the actual results of the change, but if the report is accurate and the time savings really are 65%, maybe people should just give it a try and see how it works for themselves before preaching gloom and doom.
December 5, 2012 3:51 p.m.
December 5, 2012 11:09 a.m.
December 5, 2012 10:57 a.m.