Political News

Donald Trump's comments escalate GOP rhetoric on Muslims

Posted December 8, 2015
Updated December 9, 2015

— Amid fear of terrorism, Republican presidential candidates for months have escalated their rhetoric about the place of Muslims in the United States.

A Muslim shouldn't be president. Muslims fleeing war-torn Syria and Iraq should be barred from the country. Mosques should be placed under surveillance and shut down if people are radicalized in them.

Republican front-runner Donald Trump's call Monday for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States" was the latest salvo for a party aggressively testing the boundaries between concerns about security and discrimination against a religious group.

For most of Trump's rivals in the 2016 race, as well as numerous other Republicans, it was also the proposal that finally crossed that line.

"Donald Trump is unhinged," former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said via Twitter. "His 'policy' proposals are not serious."

South Carolina Republican Chairman Matt Moore, whose state is third on the primary voting calendar, said that "as a conservative who truly cares about religious liberty, Donald Trump's bad idea and rhetoric send a shiver down my spine."

The nearly unanimous condemnation from fellow Republicans, Democrats and legal and immigration experts showed no sign of affecting Trump. He reiterated his proposal to keep Muslims out of the U.S. "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on" at a Monday night rally in South Carolina and again in a round of television interviews Tuesday morning.

Trump has faced pushback from within his party for earlier comments about Muslims, but never with such speed and force.

"Trump has proven that he can make outlandish and divisive statements, but he has yet to propose a real solution to growing concerns surrounding national security," Blair Ellis, spokesman for Republican 2nd District Congresswoman Renee Ellmers, said in an email to WRAL News.

Republican U.S. Sen. Ruchard Burr, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said officials shouldn't confuse real threats with "made-up ones."

"I know there are serious threats to our country, and America should aggressively eliminate those threats," Burr said in a statement, "but telling our allies in the fight they are not welcome in this country is not a solution."

Likewise, Republican U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis called the comments a distraction.

"It is crucial that we do not get distracted from the need to develop a clear and comprehensive strategy to defeat ISIS and protect the American homeland from radical Islamic terrorists," Tillis said in a statement. "It is also important to recognize the 5,800 Muslim-American servicemen and women who are bravely serving our nation in defense of our values and way of life."

Republican North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory said he would support "a legitimate background check" on refugees, including Muslims, entering the U.S. to ferret out any ties to terrorism, but he is against barring them from entry to the country. Also, he said he doesn't have confidence the government has a system in place for such a check.

Meanwhile, the North Carolina Republican Party and state House Speaker Tim Moore declined to comment. State Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger didn't respond to a request for comment.

Some rivals challenged his debunked assertion that thousands of Muslims living in New Jersey cheered the 9/11 attacks. The GOP field largely condemned his support for the idea of a database to track Muslims living in the U.S., but his comments were vague enough that Trump was able to walk them back without much harm to his campaign.

The White House said Trump's comments should disqualify him – and anyone who supports him – for president. Although the Republican National Committee didn't disavow the comments, Chairman Reince Priebus issued a statement that the U.S. needs to "aggressively take on radical Islamic terrorism, but not at the expense of our American values."

Trump's comments Monday came as his lead in preference polls in Iowa, the state that kicks off the nominating contest, appeared to be challenged by Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. If the real estate mogul's goal was to shift focus away from Cruz and back onto his candidacy, he no doubt succeeded.

Trump's comments seem aimed squarely at Republican primary voters wary of Muslims, particularly those with direct ties to countries in the Middle East that have spawned violent extremist groups.

A 2014 Pew Research Center poll showed Republicans view Muslims more negatively than they do any other religious group, and significantly worse than do Democrats. Following the Nov. 13 attacks in Paris, responsibility for which was claimed by the Islamic State group, surveys showed Americans increasingly opposed to accepting refugees from Syria, the predominately Muslim country where IS has a stronghold.

For Americans, the fear of Islamic State-inspired attacks drew even closer last week when a married couple killed 14 people in San Bernardino, California. The FBI said both had been radicalized for some time and the woman claimed allegiance to the Islamic State on Facebook shortly before the attack.

David McLennan, a political science professor at Meredith College in Raleigh, said the GOP is walking a difficult tightrope with Trump's stance. Pushing back too strongly could lead to Trump running as a third-party candidate, costing the Republican nominee support next November. But not distancing the the party from the rhetoric could turn off independent and swing voters and even moderate Republicans that the GOP needs to recapture the White House.

"It's not just losing the Muslim vote, it's losing anybody who believes in the values of the United States, the Constitution, anti-discrimination. It's broader than the Muslim issue right now," McLennan said.

While Trump's rhetoric may be more bombastic and his proposals more aggressive, his rivals have proposed their own ideas for keeping tabs on Muslims in the United States and blocking those who want to come here.

In September, retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson said he did not believe a Muslim should serve as president of the United States. "I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that," Carson said in an interview with NBC's "Meet The Press."

Following the Paris attacks, which left 130 people dead and hundreds more wounded, GOP candidates rallied around proposals to limit Muslim refugees coming to the U.S. Their calls were echoed by Republican governors who vowed to keep Syrian refugees from being resettled in their states.

Cruz proposed legislation banning Syrian Muslims from coming to the U.S. Bush said American assistance to Syrian refugees should focus primarily on Christians. And Carson compared handling refugees fleeing Syria's intractable civil war to dealing with "rabid dogs."

After Trump said he wanted surveillance of "certain mosques" and would considering shutting down some of those houses of worship, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said he, too, would be willing to shut down mosques and any other places that radicalize people.

While Trump has been at the forefront of his party's aggressive posture on Muslims, Democrats say the comments from other candidates give Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton a ripe opportunity to cast the entire GOP field as out of step with American values of religious tolerance.

"Given how far he's pushed the party, Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, are going to have no problem tying all of the candidates to Donald Trump in one nice little extremist package bow," said Jim Manley, a Democratic strategist.

But for some Republicans, the most pressing challenge isn't keeping Trump from negatively branding Republicans in the general election — it's making sure he's not the candidate representing the party in next November's White House race.

"So far, every boundary he has pushed has worked out for him," said Ari Fleischer, who served as White House press secretary for former President George W. Bush. "I hope GOP voters recognize this time he's gone too far."


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Sam Nada Dec 9, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Country quotas are well established in managing immigration. A worldwide ban on one religion is not. It would be a huge mistake, a violation of the human right to be free from discrimination on the basis of religion, and a gift to the extremists.

  • Hamilton Bean Dec 8, 2015
    user avatar

    For all the Trump haters, liberals, socialists, please explain to me how Jimmy Carter, when President, BANNED ALL IRANIANS ( MUSLIMS NO LESS) FROM ENTERING THE U.S. But since its Trump with the same idea, its suddenly unconstitutional???? Road Biscuits.

  • John Gardner Dec 8, 2015
    user avatar

    I actually feel sorry for the lib media once Trump is out of the race. They will have to start coming up with their own reports rather than just quoting "the Donald". CNN may go off the air completely. LOL

  • Jim Smith Dec 8, 2015
    user avatar

    So when a crazy person from the US goes out and shoots up a school or workplace etc. the Democrats scream gun control and immediately call it homegrown terrorism or radical christian terrorism. I am fine with those labels, but not gun control.
    But when a couple of extremists who make IED's, gave praise to ISIS on Facebook, rented a SUV three days before the attack, and enter a building masked with 1000s of rounds of ammo to kill the leftist media, the Democrat administration, and their voters don't dare call it terrorism until the FBI finally forces their hand days later and labels it terrorism...pathetic. To add insult to injury, the Democrats and the liberal media scream for gun control even though there were 15 bombs made and rigged to go off. Days later they back pedal and say gun control for no fly list people, but they let 72 people on the terrorist watch list work at the Department of Homeland Security, the agency that approved the terrorist's visa.

    Am I missing anything?

  • LetsBeFair Dec 8, 2015

    Barrett ... nice one.

  • LetsBeFair Dec 8, 2015

    The reason Trump has so many supporters is because he is a man of action. He's proven to do what he says. All of his accomplishments benefit others. Little has the current president done before being in office and it shows in his reckless leadership. It took him 4 days to respond because he had to study Reagan's video. Do you think Obama would have been voted in had he said he was going to do what he's actually done? And not done most of the things he said he would ... i.e. he said there would be a website to see where every dime of spending went ... where is it? and a lot more stuff. Trump, you can count on him to do 100% because his track record speaks for itself.

  • Barrett Powell Dec 8, 2015
    user avatar

    "AG Lynch said yesterday that she intends to go after anyone that targets groups unfairly-very vague."

    Does that include gun owners?

  • John Gardner Dec 8, 2015
    user avatar

    I have to say, these are some the dumbest comments I have ever read. God help America.

  • Sandy Swiger Dec 8, 2015
    user avatar

    Donald Trump is working for the Hilary Clinton campaign. He is making her job easier daily. I would even venture to say if he is not the GOP candidate, he will run as an Independent and seal the deal for Hilary.

  • LetsBeFair Dec 8, 2015

    How are his comments controversial? If Obama said them, they wouldn't be? There is always a double standard when it comes to republicans. These people he's talking about are not Americans. Those having issue with his ideas can allow these foreigners to live with YOU.