Raleigh, N.C. — House Democrats spoke out Monday in support of a bill prohibiting the state from issuing distinctively marked licenses to young immigrants allowed to be in the U.S. under federal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
DACA allows a two-year block on deportation for immigrants who were brought to the country illegally as children, who are in or have completed school or are in the military and who have no criminal record.
After DACA was implemented, the state Division of Motor Vehicles asked for an official opinion on the matter from state Attorney General Roy Cooper.
Once Cooper advised that DACA immigrants are legally eligible for licenses, Transportation Secretary Tony Tata announced he would begin issuing them, but only with a special design that includes a bright pink stripe across the top and with the words "NO LEGAL STATUS" imprinted on them.
House Bill 184 would ban the state from using the special design.
"We are the only state where there's a proposal on the table, supported by the governor, to have this sort of pink stripe" said sponsor Rep. Paul Luebke, D-Durham.
Under Luebke's proposal, licenses for DACA drivers would look like other licenses but would be set to expire at the end of their two-year grace period.
"The solution is simply to realize that these young people are legal," he said. "They should be treated like everyone else."
Rep. Rick, Glazier, D-Cumberland, said the "pink-stripe license" would stigmatize the holder every time he or she has to produce it. "It serves no legitimate state purpose," he said.
Millbrook High School graduate Jose Rico has lived in the U.S. for 10 years and would be eligible for a license under DACA. He called the special license a "scarlet letter."
"The state is outing us, putting us in a box that we are illegal when we do hold legal presence here in this state to work and, now, to drive," Rico said.
Rabbi John Friedman of Judea Reform Congregation in Durham said he couldn't imagine what supporters of the special license were thinking.
"All I can imagine is that they could not see in the faces of young people like this the faces of their own children," said Friedman. "Would they deny their own children hope?"
The measure faces long odds in the Republican-dominated legislature. McCrory has called the special license a "pragmatic compromise," saying DACA licenses must be visually distinct to make sure the license holder can't register to vote or access government services.



![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2010/08/30/8212390/8362364-1286459151-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2007/07/30/1649447/1649447-1209833775-100x75.jpg)








WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
March 5, 2013 9:07 a.m.
March 5, 2013 9:06 a.m.
March 5, 2013 9:06 a.m.
March 5, 2013 9:05 a.m.
March 5, 2013 9:04 a.m.
NO, THEY ARE NOT LEGAL, QUIT LYING! Just because they vote Democrack doesn't make them legal.
March 5, 2013 9:00 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:59 a.m.
Sounds like you should wear a "dunce" hat while driving a "clown" car.
March 5, 2013 8:56 a.m.
Again, is it so hard to put "illegal" in there? It is just one word.
March 5, 2013 8:55 a.m.
Drama queen much?
Note- I strongly support fair treatment of aliens, and support the DACA program too.
But a differently labeled license is ENTIRELY reasonable.
As noted under-drinking-age drivers got difference licenses too. Because you need to be able to tell "at a glance" that it's not a standard "ok to do whatever" license.
Same deal here.
March 5, 2013 8:50 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:50 a.m.
Last poll I saw showed those who had served were just slightly more republican than democrat.
33% to 29% (with the LARGEST group, 34%, being independents)
That's hardly a huge gap.
March 5, 2013 8:48 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:47 a.m.
Kids in the halls without hall passes, think of the horrors that would transpire!
"Why not remove the flag on the license that requires 'corrective lenses'?"
My God, the blind would take to the roads and kill us all!
"Even better, lets remove the requirement for people to pay taxes"
Of course, the next logical step after removing the corrective lenses requirement on licenses is to eliminate all taxes. But what's the NEXT step? Outlaw pencil sharpeners and allow trees to marry each other! Scary but true!
March 5, 2013 8:46 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:46 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:44 a.m.
But it's easier to make us think it's all democrats that sneak the illegals over the border.
March 5, 2013 8:44 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:40 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:39 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:38 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:35 a.m.
If they qualify for the license, they qualify as exceptions among illegal immigrants. They still can't vote; they're still not citizens. Why stigmatize them w/ the pink border? They have permission to be here; what other purpose does the pink border serve? Visual distinctions on Id. between people who are under 21 and over 21 serves the purpose of checking age for alcohol purposes. If a non-citizen is here legally, what does the pink border accomplish?
March 5, 2013 8:34 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:34 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:33 a.m.
No thanks. We see what "conservative" ideology brings NC. We have BIG gov in tanning, areolas, natural plants, possums, free ultrasounds, free counseling (including welfare, food stamp, and gov housing options) before abortions, bath salts, energy beer. Wheres this "less gov" nonsense? And save your DEM comback. Im not those libs either.
March 5, 2013 8:31 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:29 a.m.
Are you ignorant enough to say that the majority of republicans have served in the military? How about we make having a high school diploma mandatory for everyone! Maybe that will make republicans ( most of whom never got one) more reaasonable. atheistswillrule March 5, 2013 8:22 a.m. Report abuse
You beat me to it. I bet Jeff Johnson never served a day in his life. I bet he voted for that lib Romney too. 13th Intel Squad. Beale AFB. Where did you serve Jeff?
March 5, 2013 8:26 a.m.
Sounds like a Republican and Democrat alike.....
March 5, 2013 8:25 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:22 a.m.
Are you ignorant enough to say that the majority of republicans have served in the military? How about we make having a high school diploma mandatory for everyone! Maybe that will make republicans ( most of whom never got one) more reaasonable.
March 5, 2013 8:22 a.m.
Well, considering they're here as "illegal immigrants", we certainly wouldn't want a way of identifying whether or not they've taken the proper steps to become legal citizens during their period of amnesty, now would we? The audacity!
March 5, 2013 8:18 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:17 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:13 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:12 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:12 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:10 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:08 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:07 a.m.
There is a big difference in denoting an underage status so someone can glance at a license to see they are underage and what they are trying to do with these IDs.
March 5, 2013 8:07 a.m.
March 5, 2013 8:00 a.m.
March 5, 2013 7:53 a.m.
March 5, 2013 7:48 a.m.
March 5, 2013 7:42 a.m.
March 5, 2013 7:32 a.m.
March 5, 2013 7:07 a.m.
March 5, 2013 6:47 a.m.
March 5, 2013 5:50 a.m.
Am I the only one that reads this as a Demoncrat who does not understand the meaning of illegal? Recall action should be swift.
March 5, 2013 4:55 a.m.
March 4, 2013 10:27 p.m.
March 4, 2013 9:46 p.m.