Raleigh, N.C. — House Democrats spoke out Monday in support of a bill prohibiting the state from issuing distinctively marked licenses to young immigrants allowed to be in the U.S. under federal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
DACA allows a two-year block on deportation for immigrants who were brought to the country illegally as children, who are in or have completed school or are in the military and who have no criminal record.
After DACA was implemented, the state Division of Motor Vehicles asked for an official opinion on the matter from state Attorney General Roy Cooper.
Once Cooper advised that DACA immigrants are legally eligible for licenses, Transportation Secretary Tony Tata announced he would begin issuing them, but only with a special design that includes a bright pink stripe across the top and with the words "NO LEGAL STATUS" imprinted on them.
House Bill 184 would ban the state from using the special design.
"We are the only state where there's a proposal on the table, supported by the governor, to have this sort of pink stripe" said sponsor Rep. Paul Luebke, D-Durham.
Under Luebke's proposal, licenses for DACA drivers would look like other licenses but would be set to expire at the end of their two-year grace period.
"The solution is simply to realize that these young people are legal," he said. "They should be treated like everyone else."
Rep. Rick, Glazier, D-Cumberland, said the "pink-stripe license" would stigmatize the holder every time he or she has to produce it. "It serves no legitimate state purpose," he said.
Millbrook High School graduate Jose Rico has lived in the U.S. for 10 years and would be eligible for a license under DACA. He called the special license a "scarlet letter."
"The state is outing us, putting us in a box that we are illegal when we do hold legal presence here in this state to work and, now, to drive," Rico said.
Rabbi John Friedman of Judea Reform Congregation in Durham said he couldn't imagine what supporters of the special license were thinking.
"All I can imagine is that they could not see in the faces of young people like this the faces of their own children," said Friedman. "Would they deny their own children hope?"
The measure faces long odds in the Republican-dominated legislature. McCrory has called the special license a "pragmatic compromise," saying DACA licenses must be visually distinct to make sure the license holder can't register to vote or access government services.




![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/politics/2007/02/06/1195254/1296152831-_NCCapitol_800x600-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/movies/2007/12/29/2229920/2229920-1208172047-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/2008/06/05/3000786/swimming_pool-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/goaskmom/2011/04/28/9516059/9516069-1304016629-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/house_and_home/2008/07/27/3287725/Blueberries-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
This is currently impossible though.
(without them going back to a country they left as little kids for 10 years).
That's that whole "path to citizenship" thing congress is working on but hasn't passed.
March 5, 2013 4:52 p.m.
March 5, 2013 4:46 p.m.
Jeff, Jeff, Jeff... must you really bring the BIG PICTURE and the preservation of our nation into the conversation here? //sarcasm
March 5, 2013 4:41 p.m.
No one is saying that these children are bad or that that they themselves did anything wrong. HOWEVER, let's keep in mind that they came/were brought here ILLegally, and through the good graces of the libs, they are given an opportunity to do well, stay out of trouble, and make a life for themselves here LEGALLY without the fear of deportation. Whether a pink stripe is *the best* approach or not, I don't know. Is it demeaning and unreasonable? I don't think so.
Furthermore, if the pink stripe is deemed demeaning then how about an orange or green or purple or brown stripe?
March 5, 2013 4:38 p.m.
March 5, 2013 4:33 p.m.
March 5, 2013 4:23 p.m.
To be fair, being an illegal alien is ALSO a criminal offense.... further, corrective lenses, or being under 21, are NOT and yet they had special license markings for THOSE things too.
So again, what's the problem exactly?
March 5, 2013 4:10 p.m.
March 5, 2013 4:07 p.m.
March 5, 2013 3:57 p.m.
Surprise, surprise, surprise-------NOT!!!
It is NOT a scarlet letter branded on their forehead. I see it as necessary to identify them as someone who is not privy to all the benefits that are afforded to American citizens while allowing them identification and priviledges that our President has bestowed upon them and THOSE priviledges ONLY.
March 5, 2013 3:47 p.m.
March 5, 2013 3:44 p.m.
By my count most folks seem to be rather vocal that they want those darn illegals gone and support labeling them.
March 5, 2013 3:39 p.m.
I stand corrected, there is BAC limits on licenses. If you get a DWI or other alcohol impairment driving offense, they can lower the limit of what is acceptable because you have been caught before. But again, drunk driving is not the same as being brought to the US as a child. It is a criminal offense brought on by ones lack of respect for life.
March 5, 2013 3:37 p.m.
http://ojjpac.org/memorial.asp
March 5, 2013 3:30 p.m.
March 5, 2013 3:21 p.m.
March 5, 2013 3:02 p.m.
The pink stripe "could" be used as a highlighter (since the licenses DO actually expire); so when the license is produced and the stripe is seen it would then lead to checking the date of expiration.
Otherwise, if they're the same as "regular licenses" and they're asked to produce a license... They'll claim discrimination because law enforcement asked to check the date.
You can't win for losing. Send them all back
March 5, 2013 2:59 p.m.
March 5, 2013 2:57 p.m.
March 5, 2013 2:53 p.m.
March 5, 2013 2:10 p.m.
March 5, 2013 2:07 p.m.
March 5, 2013 1:44 p.m.
WE must know who are citizens and who are not-DUH!!!
March 5, 2013 1:44 p.m.
March 5, 2013 1:40 p.m.
March 5, 2013 1:19 p.m.
Good grief, nobody is denying anyone of their "hope". As "illegal" citizens, they're already being allowed to get a license. All that is being asked, is that they pursue their legal citizenship in the proper amount of time granted. If they truly want to be here as U.S. citizens, that should not be an issue at all. These "children" are of legal driving age or this would not even be a discussion.
March 5, 2013 1:09 p.m.
Wonder if he is one of those with a sign saying "OUT OF THE SHADOWS AND PROUD" or supports those that are? If he is, he has no reason to be griping about the drivers license.
March 5, 2013 12:58 p.m.
You mean the Siberian invader tribes that stole the land from the Vikings?
March 5, 2013 12:46 p.m.
This will do nothing but #1 make the people who interact with theses people treat them differently and #2 cost the state money.
March 5, 2013 12:45 p.m.
Some of these "children" are 31 years old.
March 5, 2013 12:45 p.m.
March 5, 2013 12:44 p.m.
Why is it being disregarded? Oh wait, the Kenyan has two illegal relatives, one a drunk driver, living quite openly in this country.
March 5, 2013 12:42 p.m.
Ok...let's see. We have licenses coded for persons who are provisional drivers. We have license coded for persons who are under 21. We have codes on licenses that say what type of car we're able to drive, or if we need glasses or contacts, or if we can only drive during the day. Thanks so much for following the rules, here's your license. If you continue to follow the rules you can become a US citizen and get another one. Have a nice day.
I'm not seeing the huge problem here.
March 5, 2013 12:37 p.m.
I'd accept it as the law of the country I was living in and change the circumstances of my life if it bothered me that much. But I'm not a lib, nor a "person of color" who's been told the world owes her.
The boldness of these latinas - because it's mostly girls and women getting up in front of mics and cameras - tells me they're plenty aggressive enough to take what's someone else's. Don't feel too sorry for them.
At some point, you'd think one of them would snarl, "Thanks."
March 5, 2013 12:28 p.m.
March 5, 2013 12:23 p.m.
March 5, 2013 12:11 p.m.
March 5, 2013 12:08 p.m.
I have no problem with putting a distinctive mark (pink is a bit much) on the license to indicate they have a specific legal status. They do not have citizenship, but they do have a legal status.
March 5, 2013 12:06 p.m.
No, 0bama's taken care of that with his giving OUR country away.
March 5, 2013 12:06 p.m.
No, that's what the state SHOULD do.
Don't like it? Go BACK to Mexico.
March 5, 2013 12:05 p.m.
No, they just lost their lives, their belongings, their children, their dignity, and everything else because the White people wanted the land and would do whatever it took to get it. You should read up on things like that before you start making that kind of comment.
These illegal criminal aliens need some kind of notation on that DL to make sure they don't vote. I do think the dems would balk at anything denoting that, because they would give up those votes. Whether it's a pink stripe or a green circle, something needs to be added.
March 5, 2013 12:05 p.m.
March 5, 2013 12:01 p.m.
March 5, 2013 11:53 a.m.
More flawed logic. This discussion is about those who have been 'caught' or are known to be in this country illegally. We ignore the law when it relates to to their status and dole out privileges regardless. It's illegal to ask their status and likely that sort of violation would be punished. But I guess you still don't see the difference.
March 5, 2013 11:48 a.m.
March 5, 2013 11:36 a.m.
March 5, 2013 11:31 a.m.
No, at the very least (which is 99% of the time) you DO NOT GET CAUGHT... and you get where you are going faster. Which is a benefit.
March 5, 2013 11:30 a.m.
So are you saying that if you were brought here as a child, grew up here, went to school here, work here, and that you would be happy to leave the only country you know because you were an illegal alien? I don't think so. I think you would be right there on the other side of this issue fighting to stay and continue to become a productive member of society. Remeber, the folks they are talking about are not ALL illegals, only the ones who are part of the DREAM program.
March 5, 2013 11:27 a.m.
If their parents are squatting in a home and they are caught, they don't just remove the parents and leave the kids squatting in the home. But I get that they're here through no fault of their own. My issue is that we're not preventing them from breaking in to begin with and we're so liberal with our benefits. If it was a home, they'd install better security and have stiffer penalties for repeat offenders (3 strikes, etc.). Instead, we focus on making everyone feel comfortable while our humanitarian efforts are exploited.
March 5, 2013 11:26 a.m.
March 5, 2013 11:25 a.m.