Local News

Defense seeks to block evidence in fatal I-85 crash trial

Posted August 4, 2016

— Defense attorneys for a former University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill student accused of killing three people a year ago in a wrong-way collision on Interstate 85 have asked that blood tests and other evidence be excluded when the case goes to trial this fall.

Authorities said Chandler Michael Kania was driving north in the southbound lanes near the split of I-85 and Interstate 40 in Orange County on July 19, 2015, when his Jeep Wrangler collided with a Suzuki driven by Felecia Harris.

Harris, 49, of Charlotte, her friend Darlene McGee, 46, of Charlotte, and Harris' granddaughter Jahnice Beard, 6, of Brooklyn, N.Y., were killed in the fiery wreck. Harris' daughter, Jahnia King, 9, was seriously injured.

Toxicology tests show that Kania had a blood-alcohol content of 0.17, which is more than twice the level at which a driver is considered impaired under North Carolina law. Because Kania was 20 at the time, however, any alcohol in his system would have been illegal because he was underage.

Attorneys Samuel Coleman and James Rainsford filed a motion this week to suppress the blood-alcohol evidence, saying the blood was drawn improperly and any analysis of it is therefore unreliable. A State Highway Patrol trooper asked an EMT to get a blood sample from Kania at the accident scene in violation of a 2012 order from former Highway Patrol commander Col. Michael Gilchrist, according to the motion. Although state law allows EMTs to draw blood, they aren't specifically trained to do so, and the North Carolina Medical Board and the state Office of Emergency Medical Services have determined that EMTs aren't certified for such duties, the motion states.

The attorneys also filed motions to exclude any evidence obtained from Kania's cellphone, alleging that the search warrant used to seize the phone was flawed, to exclude photos of the accident scene that might be inflammatory and to exclude estimates of Kania's speed that night from other drivers on the highway, alleging they are merely opinions and are likely inaccurate.

Kania is under house arrest in Asheboro awaiting trial on three counts each of second-degree murder and felony death by motor vehicle and one count each of felony serious injury by motor vehicle, driving while impaired, driving left of center, obtaining alcohol by a minor and underage consumption of alcohol as a minor. A grand jury also indicted him on an aggravating factor linked to a fight he had with friends who tried to stop him from driving after drinking that night.

Orange County Assistant District Attorney Jeff Nieman declined to comment on the motions, saying that he continues to prepare for trial, which is scheduled to start Oct. 3.

"One thing I’ve been very impressed with is the strength and poise that they have demonstrated," Nieman said of the victims' families.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Cindy Rose Aug 6, 2016
    user avatar

    For Chandler Kania to do anything less than accept full responsibility for his actions that horrible night is so disrespectful to the families of those he killed. If his family is financing this type of defense I also no longer feel sympathy toward what they financially stand to lose WHEN young Mr. Mania is convicted. Regardless of the outcome in court the end result is the same; lives lost, families forever changed over one person's decision to drink & drive.

  • Ben Hill Aug 5, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    The needle has to pierce the skin to get to the vein. If the EMT used isopropyl alcohol to swab the arm the defense will argue alcohol in the blood sample was introduced this way (even though this is a flawed argument since the alcohol in your blood after drinking is ethanol, not isopropyl). Also chain of custody must be established at the time of collection and maintained throughout the handling of the sample. Don't get me wrong I am not advocating for the defense on this, but proper specimen collection in this case is not as simple as you think.

  • Landon Douglas Aug 5, 2016
    user avatar

    How exactly do you draw blood improperly? A needle goes into your arm and blood comes out. It's so simple. Then the blood goes to the lab for testing. It goes in a sealed tube, so that no outside contaminants can reach the blood. The way this stuff goes on in the technical age, it is virtually impossible to contaminate the blood sample.

  • Sean Creasy Aug 5, 2016
    user avatar

    And so the little rich kid begins to try and shirk his responsibility for killing innocent people... What great parents he has to enable him to shirk his responsibilities because you know he isn't paying those layers himself!

  • David McCabe Aug 5, 2016
    user avatar

    If getting a blood test thrown out is the focus of his defense this guy is toast. I hope this tactic is fresh in their minds during the sentencing phase...

  • Byrd Ferguson Aug 4, 2016
    user avatar

    I think your affluent behind is going to prison where it belongs, Mr. rich kid.

  • Russell Chapman Aug 4, 2016
    user avatar

    Guilty as heck, however, very savvy.

  • Lance Boyle Aug 4, 2016
    user avatar

    Is he going to buy his way out of a conviction?