Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

11:58 p.m. • 5-25-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sun: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 75° F
  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 80° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 85° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-11-08 14:51:00
Updated: 2012-11-08 14:59:44

Fatal Durham Hospital fire ruled accidental


print friendly

A fatal fire that erupted during a defibrillation procedure at Durham Regional Hospital earlier this week was an accident, investigators said Thursday.

Durham Fire Department investigators said they are still working to determine the source of ignition in the blaze that broke out shortly after 2 a.m. Tuesday in a room on the sixth floor. One patient died and three employees suffered smoke inhalation.

Preliminary findings indicate a spark happened during an attempt to revive the patient, who was critically ill. The identity of the person has not been released, and hospital officials said the timing and cause of death will be determined by the state medical examiner.

The sixth floor houses Select Specialty Hospital, a separate facility that specializes in long-term acute care. The fire was initially reported to 911 as an explosion, and callers described a chaotic, smoke-filled scene.

Investigators have said the sprinkler system functioned properly and hospital employees responded appropriately to the incident.


6 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 6 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
"I take exception to headlines that fire killed the patient or that it was a fatal fire. If the staff were performing a defibrillation (versus a cardio version) then the patient by definition was already vital signs absent. This death is more aptly termed a failed resuscitation interrupted by a fire. jackcdneh1017"

I am sure your insightful analysis will greatly comfort the patent's friends and family. piene2

Actually piene2 the comment is very important. The family that your talking about will obviously sue the hospital and the actual cause of death will be key in that suit. Perhaps that is as big of a story as the original. Care to make an anti gun comment on this story?

The word "accident" implies no willful intent....however EVERY "accident" is caused...yes, every single one...an "accident" does NOT mean there was NO negligence....!!!!

the MythBusters TV show on DSC tested the 'fire' possibility. it *is* possible, but only if every-single-thing goes wrong.

LOL--as well as the mythbusters try to copy every action--there is always a envirornmental difference...and anything is possible at any given time....

An accident does not rule out negligence

the MythBusters TV show on DSC tested the 'fire' possibility. it *is* possible, but only if every-single-thing goes wrong.

View Comments VIEW ALL 6 COMMENTS