Cyclists could have priority on some Durham streets

Posted February 22, 2016

— A grassroots effort to keep cyclists safe is growing in Durham, and some streets could soon be designated as "bicycle boulevards."

Austin, Texas, and Portland, Ore., already have the concept in place that gives cyclists priority over drivers on certain streets.

"They're neighborhood streets – very calm neighborhood streets – that have been identified for being ideal for bike priority streets," said Aaron Lubeck, a member of the Durham Bicycle Boulevard Group.

The group wants to take already quiet roadways in the city and make them even calmer for cyclists by pushing drivers to busier thoroughfares. They have proposed Watts Street as a test site.

"Bikes are enhanced as a priority over cars," Lubeck said. "Cars have to divert off every four to eight blocks, so whatever through-traffic there was goes away."

People who live and park on bike boulevards would still have ample access to them, he said.

Bicycle boulevards should appeal to less-experienced cyclists who don't feel confident enough to use bike lanes on busy roads, he said.

"For me, it's a matter of access," he said. "My son turns 10 next month, and the network (of bike lanes) we have right now doesn't serve kids."

Durham City Councilman Don Moffitt supports the plan, saying he especially likes that it is a cost-effective solution that would require minor changes, such as the purple Bicycle Boulevard street signs and bike-friendly barriers.

"(These are) infrastructure improvements that don't cost a lot of money but can bring a big difference to the city," Moffitt said.

This matter is still in the development phase, with Lubeck working alongside the city's Transportation Department. Moffitt is optimistic, though, saying he would like to see testing of the boulevards by the end of the year.


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • New Holland Feb 23, 2016
    user avatar

    if your on a bike on a road where say more than 5 cars an hour normally drive, then yes bikers should pay annual registration fees too since they are occupying that space on the road too.
    Is it too much for a bicycle to pull off the road and cars go by safely? if my life depended on it YOU bet I would.

  • Andrew Stephenson Feb 23, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    I'm sure Toys R Us will be thrilled to have to start registering bikes sold with the Department of Motor Vehicles. Especially when they don't have a motor in the first place.

  • Chad Johnson Feb 23, 2016
    user avatar

    They should tag and register with DMV then

  • Roger Way Feb 23, 2016
    user avatar

    I support bicycle-friendly efforts in our towns and backroads - provided that bicyclists are held to account for obeying the same traffic laws and common sense safety procedures that motor vehicle drivers must follow.

  • Steve Clayton Feb 22, 2016
    user avatar

    How about motorists-vs-road hogging cyclist??

  • Rob Brantley Feb 22, 2016
    user avatar

    This is a great concept. As an avid mountain biker and tax payer that helps maintain trails for other mountain bikers in their spare time, let's lessen the tax burden on the non-biking community and let road cyclists help maintain paved roads. Maybe a few hundred cyclists patching potholes every weekend will be enough to end this whole cyclist-vs-road rager war once and for all.