Critics say proposal to cut food benefits will hit rural areas hard

Posted October 2, 2015

— A bill on Gov. Pat McCrory's desk would mean less food assistance for unemployed people. Supporters say the measure would encourage the jobless to look harder for work, but critics say it would increase hunger, especially in rural areas.

House Bill 318 would end Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for childless, able-bodied adults after 90 days unless they're working at least 20 hours a week or they're in job training. About 103,000 people statewide could be affected.

The work requirement is part of federal policy for SNAP, but North Carolina obtained a waiver in 2008 to drop it as unemployment spiked during the recession. The bill would end that waiver.

Wake, Durham, Orange and 20 other counties would be off the waiver in January, while the remaining 77 counties would be phased in by July 1, Alexandra Lefebvre, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services, said in an email to WRAL News.

SNAP is federally funded, so the state won't save any money by cutting benefits, which amount to about $32 a week per person.

Still, Republican lawmakers predict the move will encourage the unemployed to take their job search more seriously.

Tazra Mitchell, a policy analyst with the left-leaning North Carolina Budget & Tax Center, counters that more people are looking for work in 91 of the state's 100 counties than there are jobs available. Job training slots are also few and far between, she said.

"Just do the math. This is going to be especially harsh, and it’s unnecessary,” Mitchell said.

Vance County could be hurt the worst by the change, if it's enacted into law. The county has a 9.6 percent unemployment rate, and 6.34 percent of childless, able-bodied adults there receive SNAP benefits.

Cumberland County, where 3.84 percent of childless, employable adults receive food assistance, also would be hit hard.

Recipients by county

Select a county below to find out how many childless able-bodied adults received food stamps, adjusted for each county's labor force, as of July 2015.

Loading map

Percent of labor force


 to 3.3

 to 2.3



Childless able-bodied adults receiving food stamps as a percentage of labor force:

Childless able-bodied adults receiving food stamps: 4,186
Labor force: 540,657
Unemployed: 27,731
Unemployment rate: 5.1%

Source: NC DHHS, NC Commerce
Graphic by Tyler Dukes

"In the rural counties, especially, it’s going to hurt even harder because there’s not a robust transportation network for folks to use if they don’t have a car to keep looking for work so they can land a job," Mitchell said. "There’s not as robust a safety net system. You don’t have as many food banks in the rural areas as you do in these urban areas.”

The bill would allow volunteer work to count toward the 20-hour-a-week target, but Mitchell said volunteer opportunities also are hard to come by in many rural areas.

"Everyone who can work should work, but what we know is that there are not enough jobs for everyone who wants to work," she said. "This SNAP rule is not a test of someone’s willingness to work because, no matter how hard they’re looking for a job, if they don’t find one in three months, their food assistance is gone, and that is a policy failure."

The Budget & Tax Center has called on McCrory to veto the bill. He has until Oct. 30 to sign it, veto it or allow it to become law without his signature.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Mary Meadows Jan 1, 2016
    user avatar

    It is very difficult when you live in a rural area to find employment. When my spouse was laid off from his nice job at the bank we lived in rural West Virginia. Their unemployment office approached us with a novel idea. They said that the chances of him finding comparable employment were zero. They had a program instead that calculated your unemployment benefits and in essence they paid us to leave the state. The funds were given in a lump sum as it is pretty expensive to pick up and relocate a family. After examining the prospects of finding equitable employment he quickly began doing out of state interviews. He landed a job in Raleigh & while the funds from his unemployment didn't cover our move - when added with the relocation expenses offered at his new job- we were able to pull it off.

    I had never heard of a program like this before and used to jokingly say that they paid us to leave the state. No matter how you look at it- this approach allowed him to continue working.

  • Chris Castle Oct 14, 2015
    user avatar

    I disagree with this. Experience due to my adult son who had a part-time retail job (no luck finding full-time) and worked each week but not 20 hours each week; varied the way they scheduled him, hours each week and days. That probably is true for a lot of retail part-time workers, some weeks 20 hours, the next week less. And in rural areas, like ours, there are limited jobs and type industry, businesses. The program is based on income, they should leave it at that.

  • Sue Sloan Oct 9, 2015
    user avatar


    View quoted thread

  • K Hope Capps Oct 8, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    And how are they going to afford to move if they can't even afford food?

  • K Hope Capps Oct 8, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Do you personally know that 1. these people are "able bodied" as you claim and 2. these people are actually on assistance and waiting for a check?

  • K Hope Capps Oct 8, 2015
    user avatar

    "SNAP is federally funded, so the state won't save any money by cutting benefits, which amount to about $32 a week per person."
    Then why do this?

  • Charlie Watkins Oct 8, 2015
    user avatar

    Poor and unemployed people need to move to the larger cities where there is more assistance. Rural areas cannot take care of poor and unemployed.

  • David Bunn Oct 7, 2015
    user avatar

    I couldn't care less who it hits. Anyone one on foodstamps is taking my tax dollars, and they need to move where the jobs are, or take whatever is offered. No more of the I make more on "assistance" arguments. Go to work. I work in a company that offers good paying jobs. We cannot get people who can stay off of their phones and learn the job. If you really want to work and eat, you can. Pull up your pants, put the phone down, and be to work on time and everyday!

  • Angela Wall Oct 4, 2015
    user avatar

    Sorry...there are some programs that do not even require a high school diploma or GED/HSE to enroll. Anybody who says they can't meet one of the three criteria are just saying it.

  • Angela Wall Oct 4, 2015
    user avatar

    I teach at a community college. There is no shortage of job training programs, most are free and open access. There are grants galore to even help people with other expenses like child care. There are even some programs that do not require