Weather

Climate change debate draws differing views among scientists

Posted May 6, 2015

More than 300 miles above the Arctic Circle, Ross Burgener opens the roof of a small observatory in Barrow, Alaska, to the cold blue sky.

The sun is shining, but the temperature is more than a dozen degrees south of zero.

“We do ozone observations three times a day,” said Matt Martinsen, lead technician at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s most northern research station in the United States.

It’s just one place where raw climate data is gathered and handed off to scientists so they can study conditions and see if manmade greenhouse gasses are heating up the planet.

Martinsen said after understanding all the science, there’s no doubt in his mind that humans are having an impact on climate change.

But climate scientist John Christy believes humans are having little impact on the planet. His view on climate change is in the scientific minority when it comes to man-made global warming.

“Having different views is hopefully the way science progresses,” he said. “The one that wins is the one that is backed up by the most evidence.”

That evidence – global climate temperatures, greenhouse gas concentrations, melting sea ice and sea level rise – is why so many climate scientists believe humans are having a real impact.

“There are thousands of scientists looking at this problem,” climate researcher Pieter Tans said. “If I could find a way to explain we’re all wrong, I would jump on it. That’s a guaranteed Nobel prize.”

Christy adds, “There won’t be a Nobel prize in it because there is no Nobel prize in atmospheric science.”

There are no guarantees in atmospheric science either.

“We can’t run the climate models at the kind of resolution we run the weather models, so we know we’re short-changing ourselves when we do that kind of thing,” said climate scientist Kevin Trenberth.

Even the best climate scientists admit the best computer models still have problems..

“The models are getting a lot better, but they are not perfect by any means,” Trenberth said. “They are tools in this regard. They are the best tools that we have as what we expect to happen when we run these models, but we do need to be aware of the fact that they are not perfect.”

While computer models try to explain it and scientists debate it, the public is left to witness the weather and wonder if power, politics and personality play a larger role in the debate than simple civility should allow.

“Humility is not a word that people ascribe to the world of climate scientist,” Christy said. “I think you find very few that are willing to say, ‘I don’t know. You could be right; I could be wrong.’ That’s a human dimension that ought to be looked into more.”

29 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Mick Flynn Nov 2, 2015
    user avatar

    I see the Antarctic ice sheet is growing.

  • Jamal Jensen May 9, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    One good reason. They have invested their entire career to studying this. The worse they make global warming out to be, the greater their chances of getting more funding and keeping their jobs.

    Having money for food, shelter, clothing and to pay the bills is a big incentive to lie.

  • Jamal Jensen May 9, 2015
    user avatar

    It is now unanimous. 100% of climatologists agree that man is causing global warming.

    It used to be 97%. They eventually caught the dissenting 3% and burned them at the stake for heresy.

  • John Lobenstein May 9, 2015
    user avatar

    The soldiers of the AGW - Army of Gullible Warriors - know nothing but doom and gloom.
    They would have us believe that Ana is the harbinger of the end. This summer temperature will soar into the low 200's and we will all be fried to a crisp. We will have to close all the beaches because all the dead Polar Bears will be washing ashore creating a health hazard.

  • John Lobenstein May 9, 2015
    user avatar

    Why can't we just have a static climate? Changes and variability are just too much trouble.

  • Chris Weaver May 8, 2015
    user avatar

    http://www.petitionproject.org/

  • Chris Weaver May 8, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    You do not understand the progressive movement? Perhaps you are young.

  • Chris Weaver May 8, 2015
    user avatar

    As anyone who has participated in a science fair should recall... consensus is not part of scientific method... it is used... as politic in the choosing of 1st ,2nd and 3rd place...
    I recall the rage was the coming ice age... now this junk. But in many places.. the damage is done. The political aspect to nudge authoritarian control into existence utilizing a climate "crisis" as been in effect for many locations that adopted UN Agenda 21 and joined ICLEI who massaged local regulations to UN (cough) "standards"
    In Orange County alone the partnership w/ ICLEI under the ruse of global warming added HUNDREDS of PAGES of new regulations that stifle growth and liberty. OC just dropped their membership... but the 700pages of regulations remain and the burden of tax revenue sit square on the shoulders of the property owner (80% of all revenue) as commercial industry is repelled by the taxation and the regulation.

  • Joseph Smith May 7, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    People suffer? From what ? Higher taxes and fees. Nothing but a scam. A new religion.

  • Chris Holder May 7, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    You don't really know anything, do you? So allllll those scientists are alllll just trying to make money AND make people suffer?

    You have no rebuttals, you just yap yap yap.

More...