Civitas lawyers in ballot case have ties to McCrory

Posted November 30, 2016
Updated December 1, 2016

Gov. Pat McCrory, left, and Attorney General Roy Cooper shake hands after their first gubernatorial debate on June 24, 2016.

— While Gov. Pat McCrory isn't party to a federal lawsuit seeking to have ballots cast under same-day registration rules thrown out, the two lawyers representing the Civitas Institute in the case both have recent ties to his administration.

McCrory, a Republican, trails Attorney General Roy Cooper, a Democrat, in this year's gubernatorial race by about 10,000 votes.

The Civitas lawsuit is one of the last two major stumbling blocks left before state elections officials can finally declare this year's elections concluded. The conservative nonprofit is asking a federal court to require voters who cast same day registration ballots to meet certain eligibility hurdles – primarily going through an address verification procedure – contending that the early voting process is unfair to other voters who register in advance of the election.

While 90,000 voters cast ballots through the same-day process this year, the nonprofit estimates some 3,000 ballots are actually in question.

Lawyers in the case are supposed to have briefs to the court by Monday, and a hearing is scheduled for Dec. 8.

To press its case, Civitas has hired Josh Howard and Butch Bowers. Howard is a former State Board of Elections chairman whom McCrory appointed in 2013 and served through much of 2015. Bowers is a South Carolina lawyer who represented McCrory's office in litigation over the controversial House Bill 2 as well as the sweeping elections measure a federal appeals court struck down this summer.

Although neither McCrory nor his campaign is a party in the case, he would have a significant interest in the outcome. While 3,000 votes isn't enough for him to close the gap Cooper has opened up, it is part of a panoply of challenges that could give McCrory a slim and rapidly diminishing chance of pulling out the election.

"These lawyers have no conflict of interest," said Francis De Luca, president of the Civitas Institute. "You would be hard-pressed to find any lawyers with election expertise to represent us who probably have not had some kind of appointment or connection with Republican administration."

At the same time, McCrory blocked the State Board of Elections from hiring its choice of outside counsel to handle the case by rejecting lawyers associated wit the Brooks Pierce law firm. In a memo to the board earlier this week, General Counsel Joshua Lawson suggested that denial could hobble the state's defense.

"At the time, the state had zero attorneys and one day until the brief was due," said Patrick Gannon, a spokesman for the board.

Since then, he said, deadlines in the case have been moved back, and both Lawson and fellow state board attorney Katelyn Love have had a chance file necessary paperwork in the case.

At this point, Gannon said, the state isn't looking at hiring additional outside counsel to handle next week's hearing regarding a potential temporary restraining order in the case. Thomas Ziko, whom McCrory did sign off on, has not yet officially been hired by the board and won't be available next week because he is traveling, Gannon said.

Gannon declined to comment regarding links between the Civitas lawyers and the McCrory administration.

McCrory's press office did not respond to emails and phone calls seeking comment either Tuesday or Wednesday.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Jacob Young Dec 1, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    For the same reason the ACLU and the NAACP interfere with elections. They are left wing non profits, but have agendas and meddle in elections and all kinds of domestic politics.

  • Jacob Young Dec 1, 2016
    user avatar

    Civitas lawyers in ballot case have ties to McCrory. SO WHAT!!!????

    Hey Mark Binker, is there anything illegal going on here? Is there anything even unethical occurring? No on both counts.

    Apparently it's a slow news day and a good day to make some fake news.

  • Jack Reason Dec 1, 2016
    user avatar

    Why is it not surprising that every single thing associated with the Republicann'ts is sleazy and corrupt? Whatever verification is being requested better be established law for verifying ANY voter; otherwise, a change of rules can be processed by the GA but will only apply to future votes. I frankly don't understand the election brouhaha anyway: stey'll still be able to pass half-baked and predatory legislation by overruling Cooper's veto, just like they did with McCrory. They took a fine moderate republican (with a preexisting corrupt wrinkle or two, granted) and made a monkey out of him. Of course that won't happen with Cooper, but even though there are more democrats than repubs in NC, rural conclaves are still ruling the state,, like 100 years ago. We'll be treated to cousin Roy bellowing like a stuck pig, because he at least won't go down so easy.

  • Terry Lightfoot Dec 1, 2016
    user avatar

    Can someone explain sensibly why a Non-Profit Think Tank has any place interfering in our election and the same day voter process - which is LEGAL? Civitas is anything BUT neutral - just take time to read their John Locke inspired rag, known as a publication