banner
@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

Campaigning for the boss

Posted October 26, 2012

— Letters to the editor are a standard part of campaigns for local offices such as Register of Deeds or Clerk of Courts. 

But in Harnett County, letters signed by the staff of the Democratic incumbents who hold those two offices have raised the hackles of their Republican challengers. 

"There seems to be a conflict of interest," said Darryl Black, a Republican running against Kimberly Hargrove, the three-term incumbent.

A letter to the editor in the Dunn Daily Record signed by Matthew Willis, Hargrove's senior assistant, and eight other employees expressed "unwavering support" for their boss.

Willis said he wrote the letter at home and circulated it in the parking lot after work hours.

"You never hear anything negative about this office until the election comes around," Willis said Friday. "We do feel that Ms. Hargrove is the most qualified and experienced person."

Hargrove said she does not ask her staff to campaign on her behalf, but some volunteer to do so. And, she said, some may have good reason to openly support her campaign.

"My opponent is making an issue out of the number of staff I have in my office," she said. "That message worries a lot of them."

Black said in an interview that he thinks the county's Register of Deeds office was big for its size. 

In many respects, this is a typical exchange in the court house politics. Tales of sheriff's deputies hauling yard signs in the back of cruisers, county workers working the polls and other sorts of politicking by those who work for politicians go back decades, if not longer, in virtually every county in the state. Still, outside observers say campaigning for your boss can be a dicey proposition. 

"There's really no statutory guideline," said Wayne Rash, past president of the N.C. Association of Register of Deeds and the Register of Deeds in Caldwell County. He could not speak for the association on the matter and said he didn't know enough about the Harnett case to comment directly.

State law prohibits state workers for actively campaigning for the boss on state time. It also prohibits a state worker from using their position in supporting or opposing a candidate. So, for example, it would ethically dicey for an employee in the Department of Agriculture to mention their position if they wrote a letter to the editor endorsing the current commissioner. The same rules don't appear to apply on the local level. 

However, Rash said it was best if elected officials avoided any appearance of conflicts.

"It's a good idea to keep your employees out of that if you can," he said. With regards to writing letters to the editor, he said, "If the employees came up with that idea and wanted to do that, then the more power to them. If it was something other than that, it would be troubling."

Black said he has heard from current and former employees that some pressure is applied not only to publicly support the current Register of Deeds, but work the campaign events. 

Hargrove says that's not true. Any campaigning, she said, happens on an employee's own time and there's never any implication that an employee needs to work for her campaign in order to keep their job.

"That would be a mistake," she said. She also added her own criticism of Black.

"He's getting dirty because there are questions about his residency," she said.

The Dunn Daily Record recently reported a story that low utility usage at Black's Harnett County address raised questions about whether he really lived in the county. 

"Me and my wife have been permanent residents for many months," said Black, adding that he moved to the county in November 2011. Black said Hargrove didn't try to raise the residency issue until he raised questions about how the Register of Deeds office fails to protect people's Social Security numbers. "It's just dirty politics," he said. 

Danny Moody, the chairman of the local Harnett County Republican Party and candidate for Clerk of Court said it didn't surprise him when the letters showed up in the paper. Moody said he's seen staffers from the current Clerk of Court show up to candidates forums sporting their boss's stickers.

Still, he emphasized, he's not saying Marsha Johnson, the current Clerk of Superior Court, has done anything wrong. 

A letter signed by 25 of Johnson's staffers said she was an "outstanding clerk and we are proud to work for her."

Glenn said that if he wins the election, he'll put out the work he doesn't want anyone in the office working for future campaigns.

"To me, that's just wrong," he said. "It does raise questions as to whether they're doing it of their own free will."

Johnson said she didn't ask anyone to write letters or do other work for her campaign.

"They got together on their own," she said, noting that the clerk's race had been much less contentious than the Register of Deeds race in the county. "There is no coercion here whatsoever."

That said, Johnson added, her employees have the same right to participate in political process as everyone else. 

"If you think about it, it would be a sad thing if you had staff that didn't want to support you," she said.

6 Comments

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Oldest First
View all
  • edwardslaw1 Nov 2, 11:49 a.m.

    Neil Emory hasn't been the county manager in more than 5 years and Harnett County is now 3 managers past him. It appears Ms. Johnson that you are as sadly misinformed on the state of our county government as you are about the erroneous statements you have made to disparage Kim Hargrove who has done and is doing an excellent job as our County Register of Deeds. Since you don't even know who our county manager is, we can't trust the accuracy of anything you have posted. The REAL fact is that Kim Hargrove, a true Harnett County Resident, is supported by her staff not because she makes them, but because she does an excellent job and the citizens of Harnett County are so lucky to have someone of Kim's integrity and experience running that office.

  • marybjloves Oct 31, 10:30 p.m.

    Surely, The County Manager, Neil Emory, has not been ignorant of this illegal political
    activity in the Register of Deeds ffice! Were the County Comissioners notffied?
    On September 20, 2004, the County Commissioners were informed of thisforbidden
    political activity. WVty are they now ignoring this important matter? This issue greatly
    concerns taxpayers. Is the same practice continuing in this election?
    The Taxpayer's Coalition of Harnett County holds the County Commissioners
    accountable for enforcement of county policy and protecting taxpayers money from misuse. Why has The Daily Record not reported on this matter since they were notified September 29, 2004. Mary B. Johnson Vice-President, TCHC Buies Creek, North Carolina

  • marybjloves Oct 31, 10:30 p.m.

    This is office time, equipment, supplies and personnel paidfor by Harnett County
    taxpayer s us e d for parti s an political campai gning.
    The Harnett County Personnel Ordinance, Article V, Section 3, states "no employee shall
    (1) engage in any political or partisan activity while on duty; or (5) use any supplies or
    equipment of the countyfor political or parttsan purposes." Alty vialation of this section
    shall subject such employee to dismissal or other disciplinary ection."
    The County Attorney, Dwight Snow, and Personnel Director,Chorles Hill, testifiedfor Mrs. Hargrove in this hearing. How is it they, or the County Manager and County Commissioners hwe not enforced this policy?

  • marybjloves Oct 31, 10:28 p.m.

    To The Editor:
    The transcript of a hearing held under oath before The Employment Security
    Commission, on March 8, May 10, sndJune 13, 2002, reveals illegal political activity in
    the Harnett County Register of Deeds office by the Registrar, Kimberly S. Hargrove and
    staffmembers in the 2000 election.
    Under aath, Mrs. Hargrove admitted using (1) county ffice equipment and supplies, (2)
    ffice stafr (3) on county time during ffice hours to help her campaign in the 2000 election. Mrs. Hargrove qlso admitted, under oath, in e memo to her stffi neglecting her office responsibilities in order to campaign because, "I want to keep my job. So I need to devote o lot of my attention to this campaign."

  • jpd0007 Oct 31, 9:25 p.m.

    This is the most irresponsible and shallowest reporting I believe I have seen this year. Mr. Binker produced a "story" that was so shallow that he surrendered his credentials as a "journalist".

    I have practiced law in Harnett County for over twenty years. I have known both Marsha Johnson and Kim Hargrove. Mr. Binker, your story is a bucket of lies.

    Ms. Johnson was opposed in the Spring by an African-American woman who had retired from the Clerk's office. Every Assistant-Clerk and Deputy-Clerk backed her . . . unanimously and unsolicited.

    The same is true of Ms. Hargrove.

    Your story fails to comprehend that each of these offices is well-staffed and works because the relationships among the workers is filled with competence and respect.

    You missed the real story: two office that function in an exemplary fashion.

  • edwardslaw1 Oct 30, 11:54 p.m.

    Who better to issue and informed endorsement than the people who have both worked with and for the current Harnett County Clerk of Court and Register of Deeds? It seems to me that what Mr. Moody and Mr. Black want to do is steer the conversation away from their lack of qualifications for the positions they are running for and create "issues" that do not exist. Neither Mrs. Johnson nor Mrs. Hargrove have exerted any pressure upon their staffs to support them. They do not have to. Their staffs, just like the members of the public who work with these people on a daily basis, recognize and support their bosses because they are the only people running for these very important positions who actually understand the offices. Who have worked tirelessly to implement improvements in both offices and make them two of the best in the state. As someone who has worked in the legal field for the last 19 years, I can honestly say both of these offices work far better now than they ever have.