Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

1:54 p.m. • 2-9-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Fri: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

N.C. appeals court rebuffs challenge to Google tax breaks


e-mail print friendly
Google
Google

The state Court of Appeals on Tuesday ruled against three people who challenged the legality of incentives used to lure search engine giant Google Inc. to North Carolina.

Former Libertarian candidates Michael Munger and Barbara Howe, as well as Mark Whitely Cares, sued the state and Google three years ago, saying the tax breaks state lawmakers approved for the the company in 2006 violated the state constitution.

Lawmakers agreed to exempt large Internet data centers from sales and use taxes in return for Google's agreement to build a server farm in Lenoir. Combined state and local tax breaks for the project could be more than $200 million.

The three taxpayers said the tax breaks were unfair because individuals and most businesses couldn't qualify for them.

In a unanimous decision, the three-judge panel ruled that the three taxpayers didn't have the legal standing to challenge the tax breaks.

"The mere fact that (the) plaintiffs pay North Carolina income and sales and use taxes, without more, does not give them standing to
challenge the sales and use tax exemption afforded to eligible Internet data centers," the court ruled.

Apple Inc. also received incentives to build its own data center in western North Carolina.

RELATED TOPICS: Tax Cut

e-mail print friendly

9 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 9 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
How about this: read the opinion. It carefully and methodically describes the manner in which this panel of three judges came to the decision to affirm the decision of the trial judge. In doing so it carefully analyzes why these three individuals do not have standing.

Did I read that correctly? Did the court actually rule that taxpayers do not have the right to redress grievances with the government through the court system? Perhaps the judge should, at some point, bother to READ THE CONSTITUTION!!!!

cwood3 -- State judges are elected in NC. Just sayin.

If the taxpayers are not allowed to sue then who is. Do these guys understand that they are our employees, as taxpayers they work for US or suppose to, So goes the state just like California and the feds down the tubes. We the people have been stripped of any rights and have given them all to the government.

Hay guys-who appoints most judges??? Politicians and Lawyers!! Nuff said?? Oh-and what are most judges?? Lawyers!!

Corruption continues!!! Welcome to North Carolina!! New Jersey Jr!!!

View Comments VIEW ALL 9 COMMENTS

Market Watch

advertisement