banner
Business

Congress passes, Bush signs historic bailout bill

Posted October 3, 2008

— With the economy on the brink of meltdown and elections looming, a reluctant Congress abruptly reversed course and approved a historic $700 billion government bailout of the battered financial industry on Friday. President Bush swiftly signed it.

The 263-171 vote capped two weeks of tumult in Congress and on Wall Street, punctuated by urgent warnings from Bush that the country confronted the gravest economic disaster since the Great Depression if lawmakers failed to act.

"We have acted boldly to help prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country," Bush said shortly after the plan cleared Congress, although he conceded, "our economy continues to face serious challenges."

His somber warning was underscored on Wall Street, where enthusiasm over the rescue gave way to worries about obstacles still facing the economy, and the Dow Jones industrials dropped 157 points. The Labor Department said earlier in the day that employers had slashed 159,000 jobs in September, the largest cut in five years.

The historic vote was a striking turnaround from the measure's spectacular failure earlier in the week, which had triggered a massive stock sell-off and prompted jittery lawmakers - fearing a crushing economic contagion that was spreading to their constituents - to reconsider.

"Let's not kid ourselves: We're in the midst of a recession. It's going to be a rough ride, but it will be a whole lot rougher ride" without the rescue plan, said Rep. John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, the minority leader, as he prepared to cast his vote for the most sweeping federal intervention in markets in decades.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson pledged quick action to get the program up and operating.

The bailout, which gives the government broad authority to buy up toxic mortgage-related investments and other distressed assets from tottering financial institutions, is designed to ease a credit crunch that began on Wall Street but is engulfing businesses around the nation.

"In these past two weeks, we've seen things we never thought we would see before in terms of the economic insecurity of our own country," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. She said the measure would "begin to shape the financial stability of our country and the economic security of our people."

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman, said the rescue bill was just the beginning of a much larger task Congress will tackle next year: overhauling housing policy and financial regulation in a legislative effort he compared to the New Deal.

 

Views of N.C. representatives, residents

North Carolina Republican Reps. Howard Coble and Sue Myrick were among those who changed their minds and voted for the package.

Coble said on the House floor Friday that feedback from his constituents over the week heavily influenced his decision. After he and the House voted down the proposal Monday, he said he received calls and e-mails from constituents voicing support for the measure.

Looking ahead to the election, Myrick said, "I may lose this race over this vote, but that's OK with me. This is the right vote for the country," Myrick said.

The votes of other North Carolina representatives remained the same from Monday's vote – voting yes were Democrats Bob Etheridge, Brad Miller, David Price and Mel Watt; voting no were Democrats G.K. Butterfield, Mike McIntyre and Heath Shuler and Republicans Virginia Foxx, Robin Hayes, Walter B. Jones and Patrick McHenry.

An Elon University poll showed that a plurality of North Carolinians supported the bailout plan, but many still harbored doubts: Fourty-eight percent of respondents expressed support for the plan, but 40 percent said they opposed it.

Nearly 54 percent said they expected the bailout to have a positive or extremely positive effect on the economy.

Two portions of the bill garnered support levels of support over 70 percent: capping the pay of executives in firms that accept government assistance and increased federal regulation of financial institutions.

The poll, conducted Sept. 29-Oct. 2, surveyed 477 North Carolina residents by cell and landline phones and has a margin of error of 4.6 percentage points.

Politicking, sweetners behind bill's passage

 

Just four days earlier, the previous version of the bill was sent down to defeat, largely at the hands of angry conservative Republicans. On Friday, a total of 33 Democrats and 25 Republicans switched from opposition to support. In all, 91 Republicans joined 172 Democrats to support the measure while 108 Republicans and 63 Democrats voted "no."

The reversal reflected a high-stakes political environment just four weeks before Election Day. Some lawmakers were worried about their own jobs, while others said the prospect of economic disaster superseded their political fears.

Thirteen members of the Congressional Black Caucaus switched their votes from "no" to "yes." Several representatives said they changed course after presidential candidate Barack Obama told them that he would back legislation to help struggling consumers and homeowners facing foreclosures if he wins the White House.

"It's not too often you get the future president telling you that his priority matches your priority," said Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., one of 13 black lawmakers who switched from "no" to "yes."

Republican presidential candidate John McCain also lobbied for the measure, according to aides. Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the party vote-counter, said McCain phoned Rep. John Shadegg, a fellow Arizonan who switched to "yes."

The legislation's roller-coaster ride through Congress began at a somber meeting in Pelosi's office in mid-September, where Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke frightened senior Democrats and Republicans with their warnings of an impending economic collapse without quick legislative action.

As lawmakers scrambled to draft a bill, they were barraged by angry calls from constituents to reject what many saw as a huge giveaway to the very financial institutions that helped cause the subprime mortgage meltdown at the root of the economic crisis - with nothing to help its ordinary victims.

"Pray for our republic," intoned Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, a leading opponent of the measure. "She's being placed in very uncaring and greedy hands."

After the breathtaking House defeat on Monday, Senate leaders took custody of the rescue, adding on $110 billion in tax breaks designed to attract additional support. They attached the overall measure to a popular bill mandating broader mental health coverage in the insurance industry.

The rescue measure was changed to lift, from $100,000 to $250,000, the cap on government bank deposit insurance - a key priority for Republicans. Also key to winning GOP support was a decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission to ease accounting rules that require financial institutions to show the deflated value of assets on their balance sheets.

The revised measure won Senate approval Wednesday night, 74-25, setting up a furious round of lobbying in the House as the administration, congressional leaders, the presidential candidates and outside groups joined forces behind the measure.

The maneuvers worked - augmented by a shift in public opinion that occurred after the stock market took its largest-ever one-day dive on Monday.

The plan - initially a three-page request from the Bush administration for unlimited power to use $700 billion any way it saw fit to stabilize markets - swelled to more than 450 pages as negotiators added restrictions for the administration and sweeteners for anxious members of Congress.

Lawmakers added greater supervision over the $700 billion - including a process where Congress could vote to block half the money - measures to protect taxpayers, and steps to crack down on "golden parachutes" for corporate executives whose companies benefit from the bailout.

160 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Adelinthe Oct 3, 2008

    Myword - "Basically Bush ordered a no enforcement rule every time he could."

    And so did Clinton.

    There's been no one with gon4ds in DC since Reagan left.

    God bless.

    Rev. RB

  • sorry Oct 3, 2008

    What a sad day for the USA

  • Myword Oct 3, 2008

    collie..actually they should have bought us all a drink before they.......us.

  • colliedave Oct 3, 2008

    soon we will be drowning our sorrows in tax-payper subsidized rum.

  • readme Oct 3, 2008

    This problem was not caused by one single thing. If you're blaming W, you're right. If you're blaming the Dems or the CRA, you're also right. Greed? Right again. But regulations and bailouts are not the solution. The solution is the Libertarian way. No bailout. Companies that make bad investments fail. Other companies will come in and help with the credit crunch, making a profit. Things will be bad, then things will get better. The economy will rebound without government artifically propping it up.

  • davidgnews Oct 3, 2008

    Once more, because Obama NEVER said I'll veto EVERY EAR MARK P E R I O D!

    LOL, that's if he gets elected _president_ and doesn't apply to his current senatorial status.

    I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these congresscritters were directly threatened with having their next campaigns challenged by people within their own party if they didn't support the Wall St. pirates.

  • Myword Oct 3, 2008

    Rev- no sorry not the same. You GOPers still can't admit that Bush shut down every aspect of regulation he could. I was not talking about laws, but the quality of the regulation of the laws we have in this country. Basically Bush ordered a no enforcement rule every time he could. He did the same for the EPA and OSHA as well.

  • bs101fly Oct 3, 2008

    "How is his signature on the bill any different than McCain's?"

    Once more, because Obama NEVER said I'll veto EVERY EAR MARK
    P E R I O D!

    McCain could've gotten away with it HAD HE NOT SAID THOSE VERY WORDS!

    Game over!

  • Adelinthe Oct 3, 2008

    Myword - "Rev RB It IS Bush's fault because for all these years he fought every step of the way to keep the executive branch (which means most) regulators from doing anything!"

    SO DID CLINTON; IN FACT LOWING THE STANDARDS FOR GETTING A MORTGAGE WAS CLINTON'S IDEA. IN HIS PRE-ELECTION SPEECHES, HE PROMISED THAT EVERYONE WHO WANTED A HOUSE WOULD BE ABLE TO GET ONE.

    God bless.

    Rev. RB

  • Adelinthe Oct 3, 2008

    geosol - "Thank you George W. Bush and the people who helped put you in office."

    What about the other 534 people who voted to pass this bill?

    Congress = 435-House of Representatives, 100-Senate = 535 Members total

    God bless.

    Rev. RB

More...