Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

6:46 a.m. • 5-22-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 86° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image
@NCCapitol
car
print friendly

Bill would scrap NC vehicle safety inspections

Published: 2013-02-22 18:20:00
Updated: 2013-02-22 19:19:41

Tags: Lawmakers

Lawmakers are making another run at eliminating the annual vehicle safety inspection requirement.

North Carolina is one of 18 states, along with the District of Columbia, to mandate the inspections, but House Bill 59 would scrap the requirement.

Some lawmakers say the move would cut back on bureaucracy and save drivers a little money. About 8 million cars and trucks are inspected each year, and the safety portion accounts for $13.60 of the $30 cost for an annual vehicle inspection, which also includes a check of the emissions system.

House Bill 59 doesn't call for eliminating the emissions test.

The House Transportation Committee is expected to debate the proposal next Tuesday, but many drivers and mechanics say they would like to keep the inspections.

"I think it's a small price to pay to make sure that people are driving vehicles that are in good working order and they're not going to create some sort of safety problem for everybody else," driver Jennipher Swanner said.

Out of about 20 cars he sees each day at Express Inspection and Service in Cary, Darren Clark said seven or eight have a safety problem. When money's tight, maintenance gets put off, he said, so the number of vehicles with problems has been on the rise in recent years.

"Gas is going up like crazy too, you know," Clark said. "Sometimes it's more important about getting to your destination than having a safe vehicle."

A similar bill was filed two years ago, and lawmakers have scaled back emissions tests in recent years to exempt newer vehicles from that requirement.

AAA Carolinas said annual inspections make North Carolina roads safer.

"In states that still have the mandated inspections, as opposed to those that don't, accidents are about 27 percent less," AAA's Jodi Woolard said.

Doing away with safety inspections could end up costing drivers more money down the road, Woolard said.

"If people are not required to get their vehicles inspected, they're going to let them go," she said. "They're prone to be in more accidents. More accidents equates to higher insurance rates, and that affects everyone who drives."

Read More Posts from this Blog

162 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.


page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

It would really come as a relief.

Michigan and Minnesota don't have inspections are they more or less dangerous to drive in than here? ykm February 25, 2013 1:57 p.m. Report abuse

What season?

The extra $10.00 is for whom, the state, the service dealer, the machanic because it can't be for me, I am the one left with an empty space in my wallet. airbornemonty February 23, 2013 3:06 p.m. Report abuse

Its to cover their $2 "made in China" tint tester and the minute it takes to check each window.

State inspections are nothing but a tax. Let law enforcement stop vehicles that have bald tires or lights that do not work.... A person can get a car inspected and the same day a head-light burns out.....and can travel highways for a full year because they just passed a worthless inspection. lessismore February 25, 2013 11:16 a.m. Report abuse

WHats happening. I actaully agree with you!!

What do they really check that keeps you safe? The tires? Lights? (we have laws for lights already), wipers? LOL. They dont check your brakes, steering, etc. Now can I get my windows tinted as dark as I want?

Michigan and Minnesota don't have inspections are they more or less dangerous to drive in than here?

I'm sorry....I will pay the $13 if it means they can catch unsafe vehicles. Yes some things may not seem a big deal, but very well could be.....but how many big deals ARE caught and made to be corrected. Maintenance is an easy thing to overlook or skip when money is tight. But it usually bites you in the rear later with a BIGGER bill to fix something when it breaks.

And if accidents are reducedy 27%, that is alot!!! For every four cars on the road, one is saved from a potential accident and life change.

Because your 98 is OBDII. This was introduced in 96 And how do ya figure one should have an emission inspection and the other doesn't. yep OBD11 like that makes any sense. It's a scam that should be done away with. ykm

I agree the emissions part is a scam, as are property taxes on vehicles. Again, thats why I have a 85 honda and a 75 suburban.

Most states have realized that the inspections are a waste of time and money. Hopefully NC will follow the other states in getting rid of the inspection. About time.

"We all cant be upstanding citizens like you. I never do any of the above, and I cant be the only one out there on the roads who doesnt give a flip about maintenance or checking their tires. You are bound to run into me or my ilk at one point or another on the roads. No matter how safe you think you are, the inspection that I have to undergo each year makes the roads safer for you and your family. They always find something wrong with my car and afterwards I fix it and go on my merry way. Cya on the streets"

Guess you dont brush your teeth either.

"Just recently moved from North Carolina to Ohio and I think if there is any doubt about the benefits of an annual safety inspection one look at the junk roaming the highways up here will change your mind. Even the dealers fail to repair safety defects before offering the vehicle for sale. It's an inconvenience in NC but pays off in the end."

Yep, seen a few out of state vehicles here for people who have moved and not yet changed their registration. They brought their cars in for basic service and we found they had large chunks of frame missing where things had rotted off. Needless to say we told them to scrap the vehicle due to the major repairs needed to make it somewhat roadworthy. The rust will continue to be a basis for future repairs as things rot off.

just another form of gov ment intrusion tax that needs to be abolished at once if not sooner.

I visually check my tires, windshieled wipers and lights at least once a month. My life and my family life depend on my car being safe. Auto inspections do about as much good as brushing your teeth once a year. Mechanical problems with a car does not have a set time or date to malfuction. If you are prone to just get in your car and dont care about safety issues--getting it inspected once a year is useless.

This is one of many instances where you can't rely on "personal responsibility" to save people's lives. G0d knows I wouldn't get my car inspected if I didnt have to and I'm sure I'm not the only one. I say keep the inspections.

Get rid of them. 32 other states do not have them and studies show that they do not reduce accidents.

State inspections are nothing but a tax. Let law enforcement stop vehicles that have bald tires or lights that do not work.... A person can get a car inspected and the same day a head-light burns out.....and can travel highways for a full year because they just passed a worthless inspection.

They should eliminate the emissions part also, or else there is little real benefit. All the old cars that realistically will fail that test are all exempt. Get rid of the whole thing and really save people time and money.

"Get rid of inspections and you are taking money away from hard working people." It's not okay to pay people to do non-value-add activity just so we can put money in their pockets. That idea reeks of old-school government inefficiency.

"Get rid of inspections and you are taking money away from hard working people."

Let them work hard doing something useful. The only people who want inspections are the inspectors and hand-wringing statists.

Please please please pass this! The whole inspection thing is such an inconvenience!

Because your 98 is OBDII. This was introduced in 96 And how do ya figure one should have an emission inspection and the other doesn't. yep OBD11 like that makes any sense. It's a scam that should be done away with.

"a burden need to do away with the places i have mine inspected jusy want the money they dont even look at car"

Then report them. If they are not doing your NCSI properly, report them to the DMV.

"The only people that this would have an effect on are the law abiding citizens. There are so many people out there without insurance or drivers license, do you really think those people are woried about getting their cars inspected annually??? I think not! Good people will keep their cars in good safe condition whether there is an ADDITIONAL government tax or not. The ones who expect handouts now, won't change either way."

Without an inspection, you will not get your new registration. Even "good people" ignore their cars. You may take care of yours, but a large percentage of the populous("handout takers included") don't take care of their vehicle until it causes them to fix it. I see way to many folks in the shop who are "good people" and yet they don't fix it until they can't drive it any more. There are exeptions, but poor maintenance is the norm.

First off, the statistics quoted by AAA have nothing to do with safety inspections. In fact, the DOT statistics show that there is no net benefit of safety inspections in terms of accidents, injuries, or deaths. It's a money making racket that brings in millions to the state. Of course some repair shops want to keep it. They can bilk customers out of $$ by finding "unsafe" items and charging ridiculous fees to fix them. I once had a shop tell me my wipers were shot when I had just put new ones on a week before, and that the belt was bad when it was recently replaced by the dealer. This was not a fly-by-not shop either. This is another unnecessary regulation that costs the individual with no real net benefit. It's time to judge government programs by realistic benefit and stop listening to the feel-good "many drivers and mechanics."

"What ever you do do not change out the battery yourself as it will reset the computer and have to reset by mileage before it can be inspected. If a dealer or tire place changes it they will hook up a standby battery to keep the computer active. Not a problem if you drive alot of miles but is a pain if you do not. 3 cars in front of me for inspections have this problem and you have to take it back numerous times to see if it is reset. More money to the dealers."

People change out batteries themselves every day. If you are proficcient enough to DIY then do so. A "Not Ready Rejection" is what you get after the computer has been reset. There is no "More money to the dealers". A Not Ready Rejection is a no charge. Most vehicles are reset within 50-100 miles. The car needs some city and highway driving, needs to get fully warmed up, and then cool down completely several times before most will be reset enough to pass.

Keep the safety inspection and scrap the emissions testing.

You'll be happy to have the inspector tell you your ball joints are trashed rather that have the wheel fold up in the wheel well while going 55, So will the guy beside you.

A prominent aspiring politician later died this way. Vehicular sabotage is the prevailing method of eliminating political dissidents in this country, all through "Safety Inspections," I know myself. This is what the takeover in this country is all about, INCREMENTALLY. "Hidden in plain sight." rickahyatt

I would be more worried about other mandates.

Like Sodium Flurodie (industrial waste and poison) in your tap water, and aspartame (insecticide) in your diet sodas.

"Safety inspection are a joke you all know if you know someone you can get your vehicle to pass inspection. Away with the silly inspections. Money rackets anyway." - Mustange

I say have at it. People who ignore the regulations on NCSI have no one but themselves to blame when they get caught. I never understood why someone would risk(for themselves and their employer) fines, loss of inspection license, and potentially jail time for a little extra cash. It's just a matter of time before they are caught. Personally, I don't do things to risk my livelyhood or the lively hood of the shop I work at.

The inspection system has become a bit ridiculous. My sons 95 yota doesn't need a emission test but my 98 chevy does. Figure that one out. A basic safety inspection is a good idea.

Because your 98 is OBDII. This was introduced in 96.

Thats why I drive a 75 suburban and a 85 Honda :-).

The inspection system has become a bit ridiculous. My sons 95 yota doesn't need a emission test but my 98 chevy does. Figure that one out. A basic safety inspection is a good idea. The cost or mandate is silly. If you fix and maintain your vehicle as I do a simple tars, lights and brakes inspection shouldn't cost 30 bucks. If you have a regular mechanic maintain your vehicle they should be able to sign off on the safety requirement with or without a fee. Up to them.

How about only safety and emissions testing on cars older than 10 years. Those who buy a new car every few years are off the hook. Those like me who drive an older car get tested (and find the "right" place to get a passing grade on inspection) These places aren't too hard to find. That car you're driving next to that just passed safety inspection might not be as safe as you think it is. Jus sayin'.

Ask yourselves how many traffic accidents or deaths are caused by faulty vehicles rather than drunks or lousy drivers. The inspection system was simply another tax on NC citizens. To bad they're not as concerned about drivers without insurance, without licenses and those who buy insurance simply to get registered than drop it the next day.

@Point Blank: Right. ANOTHER incremental attack upon individual responsibility and fortitude, another reach towards the socialist environment where we have no rights, no responsibilities, no honor, no pride, no wish to enrich ourselves through personal initiative and hard work? Not to mention, absolute control by the Ruling Commie Party? Sicko, Wacko, dude.

I should mention that I've been an Federal undercover agent for many, many years, just yearning to come in out of the cold. www.rickhyatt.freeservers.com

My first experience with a State mandated safety inspector was on the Island of Maui. There, the government is very corrupt, and highly oriented to the secession of it in an Asian way, towards Red China. When I went to have my truck "Safety Checked," I happened upon him placing rock salt into my frame members. I later nearly swerved off the road on the way to Lahaina, because of Legislature-mandated road surfaces that left large berms on the asphalt surfaces, that nearly caused me to go head-on into oncoming traffic. A prominent aspiring politician later died this way. Vehicular sabotage is the prevailing method of eliminating political dissidents in this country, all through "Safety Inspections," I know myself. This is what the takeover in this country is all about, INCREMENTALLY. "Hidden in plain sight."

Are the lawmakers in Raleigh out of their minds? Even new cars are subject to problems. Hello? Recalls. Suppose someone's tailpipe flies off and it smashes into the auto behind it? That's a preventable accident. Plus, the state makes some revenue from 8 million drivers.

Yearly safety inspectios accomplishes about as much as brushing your teeth once a year. Nothing on a car has scheduled time or date to malfuction.

SCRAP IT ASAP!!!!! Its the greatest idea this yr! Nothin but a money maker riding the back of safety! No more inspections! Not needed!

I think its amazing how small minded people are. Safety inspections are needed. If you only knew how many 3 and 4 year old cars ive seen and worked on that have bald tires, worn out brakes, shot windshield wipers, etc. The worst part is the owners are not willing to fix the problems there atitude is its time to get a new car. Yet the cars that are over the 6 year mark most of the owners are willing to do what needs to be done because they are not in that cushy 50k+ a year job, and a new car is NOT an option. To those who yell about an older car held together with bailing wire, duct tape etc you might want to rethink things. What would you be driving if you only made 15k a year? My last point is many forget that there are alot of old classic cars still on the road that are worth more then your BMW and most likely are in better condition.

My argument has always been with the tint on my windshield. Every time that I have the car inspected, I am charged an extra $10.00 for the inspection of the, state/federal approved tint on the windshield.

I have told them time and time again that it is the same old car with the same old tint, but I am still charged because it is mandated by the supposedly state regulations.

The extra $10.00 is for whom, the state, the service dealer, the machanic because it can't be for me, I am the one left with an empty space in my wallet.

Please keep the inspection from what i have seen after moving to FL is scary. I have seen cars with tires that did not even have traction they were flat. We have so many accident because majority of the cars should not be on the road. Can't wait to move back to NC. KEEP inspection.

I have to say I agree with others that scrapping inspections is a dumb idea. One personal example - I worked in the same building as someone whose car's brake lights did not work. I mentioned this to him, and he said he knew but didn't care. I called Durham Police (we worked in Durham county), and they said they didn't care.

After 6-7 months his taillights started working - I'm assuming he couldn't pass inspection - and renew his tags - until he got them fixed. Either that or someone rear ended him, and he conned their insurance into fixing it for him.

I don't mind the inspections so much, but I hate the sales pitch that goes with it and the fact that if you don't know the station owner, they will find something wrong and give you a bill to fix it-then go down the road to the neighborhood station and you pass-you figure it out-its all a game of gotcha

Posting on Saturday... I guess WRAL forgot to turn off the comments.

Scubagirl I really hate to tell you this but thousands of unsafe vehicles travel North Carolina roads every day! But how unsafe is determined from a multitudes of opinions. Mostly auto repair shops wanting to make a quick buck. Some shops are sincere and some are not.You are also not considering the vehicles from out of state that don't have inspections.So the program is LAME and has no bearing on data that says our roads are safer because of it.

I noticed that the interviews shown were at bias locations. An inspection station worker will want to keep inspections because that is his job. AAA would want to keep inspections so that they don't risk more flat runs & such. They get paid regardless of number of flats on the road. Less flats = more profit. Did they ask any of the working poor who can't just go out and get a new $100 oxygen sensor (which effects nothing on an inspection other than that little light on the dash). How about just ask someone in a random location? Better yet, go to the court house and ask someone who has received a ticket for inspection or even ask the Assistant DA in traffic court how much time he/she wastes on inspection tickets. Think about this too... Do you like paying 3 taxes per year for your car in 3 different locations? Property Tax, Inspection & tags. All are a form of tax. How much money could North Carolina save by getting rid of inspections and combining the tags and property taxes?

"Not scraper but the hole punch."

Required equipment is required equipment. When the statute changes and they aren't on the list, then you can toss it. Also sounds like they got on the wrong side of the auditor. Treat them poorly, and they will give you the rubber glove treatment.

*snap* Bend over.

@Uhavenoclu---"They fail you because your horn does not work?????????That has nothing to do with safety,in fact it is only in an emergency by law to use it." Your user name couldn't more befitting as you indeed do not have a clue.

"Punish those who try to drive unsafe vehicles on our roads. If your car passes you pay nothing, if it doesn't, you pay after it passes a re-inspection (if something serious, I'm not talking about a $2 bulb going out)."

So if you have a turn signal light out, that's ok. You don't understand safety do you? The lights are on your car for a reason. So you can see, others can see you, and so you can signal your intentions to others around you. Are those things not important when driving a 1 ton projectile?

Jennipher Swanner agrees with this law until she has to pay $2000 to have a faulty O2 sensor fixed so her car will pass inspection. Smh.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

Political Video Picks

 
  • In an interview Tuesday, May 21, Gov. Pat McCrory said he is pleased with the progress on the state budget and tax reform so far.

  • Capitol Bureau Chief Laura Leslie and investigative reporter Mark Binker break down the North Carolina Senate's budget proposal.

  • The Senate budget subcommittee on health and human services gives a presentation on May 20, 2013.

  • North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper and a number of local law enforcement officials from across the state on Monday criticized…

  • Some teachers say the proposed Senate budget, which includes no pay raise for teachers and other changes to education funding, is…

  • Lawmakers called it a step toward a more expansive biometric system that would use identifiers such as fingerprints to keep track of…