Raleigh, N.C. — Rep. Mark Brody, R-Union, and three fellow Republicans have filled a bill that would put a moratorium on a state program that issues licenses to some drivers who are in the U.S. illegally.
State transportation officials have announced they will start issuing driver’s licenses and ID cards on March 25 to some people who entered the country illegally. Created by a presidential executive order, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program blocks deportation of and grants work permits to those who were brought to the country illegally as young children.
House Bill 141 would put the state license program on hold until at least June 15.
"The executive order is controversial," Brody said Thursday morning. "We had no say in it."
The legislature, he said, should have time to study the matter and submit bills address the program.
One possibility, he said, would be that supporters of the program might file a bill to redesign the license. As currently announced, identity cards issued to those in the DACA program would be vertical, expire on the date their deferral period ends and carry a message indicating that it confers no legal status upon the holder.
“North Carolina should not be making it harder for aspiring citizens to integrate and contribute to our communities by branding them with a second-class driver’s license,” Raul Pinto, a lawyer with the ACLU, said in a news release.
The release wasn't issued in response to the pending legislation.
The moratorium, Brody said, could also give opponents of issuing the special licenses time to pass a bill instructing Division of Motor Vehicles to end the practice entirely.
"It doesn't set any policy whatsoever. It just gives everybody time to look at it," Brody said.




![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/politics/2007/02/06/1195254/1296152831-_NCCapitol_800x600-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/movies/2007/12/29/2229920/2229920-1208172047-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/2008/06/05/3000786/swimming_pool-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/goaskmom/2011/04/28/9516059/9516069-1304016629-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/house_and_home/2008/07/27/3287725/Blueberries-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This blog post is closed for comments.
It's almost like you have decided on an opinion and no amount of facts proving you wrong will alter it. per junkmail5
------------------------
Actually your are talking out of your rear orafice. These people remain "illegal"...Obama's "EXECUTIVE ORDER" is just that an "ORDER" from the chief "EXECUTIVE" to personnel under his purview to TEMPORARILY IGNORE THE LAW OF THE LAND (ie. not enforce it)...
An Executive Order is not a CHANGE IN THE LAW...we are, after all a REPUBLIC not a MONARCHY!
February 21, 2013 2:46 p.m.
Correct but they should not". - NCOuterBanks69
So by your standards a German student in the US on a education Visa should not be able to get a license to drive? Odd they let me get one in Europe.
Or how about co-workers who live here from Europe on an work Visa for a company such as Caterpillar? Now how about India? Or China?
Go ahead and admit your problem is with Hispanics. That is not an immigration issue. It's a racism and bigotry issue.
February 21, 2013 2:44 p.m.
yes, it enables them to actually follow the law... how horrible!
It also enables them to go to the jobs they are LEGALLY ENTITLED TO WORK AT under this program.
February 21, 2013 2:43 p.m.
-----------------------
Nor should North Carolina be legally obligated to provide ID to citizens of Mexico or any other sovereign nation!
If these individuals want a North Carolina license then they should have to do what every other person in this state is required to do...PROVE LEGAL RESIDENCE!!!!
Correct me if I'm wrong BUT isn't an "Executive Order" limited to THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH or its departments and/or employees...since when is the North Carolina DOT/Driver's License Division a member of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH?
February 21, 2013 2:41 p.m.
May... I was hit a couple of months ago by a lady with no insurance... but am 120% for these people geting license, jobs, rights, taxed, amnesty and anything else we as citizens are entitled to
February 21, 2013 2:41 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:39 p.m.
LOL you are so totally wrong about that! Courts have ruled over and over that illegal aliens have the same basic constitutional rights that all Americans have, including due process, right public education and so on.
So who are YOU to deny THEIR rights?
February 21, 2013 2:30 p.m.
really? in what, specific, way is the "legality being looked at"?
because even Mitt Romney said he'd honor the grants of the program if elected.
It's currently a valid government program. States don't get to ignore that in hopes some day it'll change.
We have 3 branches for checks and balances- iamsiam1096
We do! and far as I know there's nothing pending before the courts about the program not being legal.
And nothing has passed either house in congress suggesting it's not legal either.
So to reiterate these are people brought here as children, who have known no other home or country, who want to LEGALLY work (ie pay taxes and everything!) and the federal government has approved them to do exactly that under this program.
Including the whole legal to work part.
No reason to deny DLs.
February 21, 2013 2:29 p.m.
Yep get complacent and think you got it all under control. Funny thing is the unemployment is still terrible because Barry is more worried about this penney ante social isssue because he has no idead how to create jobs just dependency.
February 21, 2013 2:28 p.m.
Yes, they are illegal immigrants, but they didn't know that when their parents were bringing them.
I'm not sure I agree with giving them licenses or not. I'd rather have them legally licensed to drive and thus more likely to have insurance than I would having them drive anyway without the proper tests taken and without insurance.
But, do you think these children had a choice in the matter of becoming illegal immigrants?
February 21, 2013 2:28 p.m.
What in the WORLD are you talking about? Besides the citizenship part, these immigrants would have to satisfy ALL of the other requirements for a DL: insurance, written test, and road test. They would be held to the same standard as US citizens in those respects.
February 21, 2013 2:27 p.m.
Incorrect they are not citizens of this country that is for sure. Try bringing a child in mexico and see if they will be granted citizenship.
February 21, 2013 2:26 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:25 p.m.
so you're wrong right out of the gate!
There are rights specifically for US citizens.
There's also rights for anyone physically in the US.
They're not the same rights, but many overlap.
Oddly, you've repeatedly ignored the FACT that the people who ar getting licenses are ALLOWED to stay here, and LEGALLY WORK, under the government program that have signed up for.
It's almost like you have decided on an opinion and no amount of facts proving you wrong will alter it.
February 21, 2013 2:24 p.m.
Wrong. A U.S. driver's license does not constitute proof of citizenship for the I-9 form. It's proof of identity only.
February 21, 2013 2:23 p.m.
Correct but they should not.
February 21, 2013 2:20 p.m.
considering that a drivers license currently serves as a valid form of proof of residence for voter registration, it could easily end up giving certain citizenship rights unintentionally.
February 21, 2013 2:19 p.m.
pchuck88..........i'm interested in knowing why you would say that.
February 21, 2013 2:19 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:17 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:16 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:16 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:12 p.m.
fair enough. who is going to tell that to the "native" americans that actually came here just as illegally? don't get too caught up on that word "native"...they are no more native than the european settlers. we all came here from some where else.
February 21, 2013 2:09 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:08 p.m.
Correction - I used double negative - meant to say "I still disagree with the idea that the illegals (children brought here or otherwise) should automatically get licenses."
February 21, 2013 2:08 p.m.
Answer: Because NC legislature (correctly) believes that issuing drivers licenses is not good policy! Next question?
February 21, 2013 2:06 p.m.
@Nice - I am sorry but exactly are you talking about?
February 21, 2013 2:04 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:04 p.m.
@Crumps - thank you consistently catching the hypocrisy of the liberals! Your responses help a lot with alleviating my BP rise when I read some the comments on GOLO.
February 21, 2013 2:03 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:02 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:00 p.m.
February 21, 2013 2:00 p.m.
Jobs Council which never even had a meeting. Crumps Br0ther
Funny the CEO's from his jobs council admitted they completed 90% of the initiatives they set out to accomplish. But hey say whatever makes you feel good, that's why conservative approval ratings are in the toilet now. "Stupid Party Strikes again"
February 21, 2013 1:56 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:53 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:53 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:49 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:49 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:47 p.m.
A drivers license is not a privilege of citizenship. There's lots of non-citizens who legally have one.
February 21, 2013 1:47 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:44 p.m.
lol...sounds great where can I vote for that?
February 21, 2013 1:41 p.m.
lol... imaging that.. the fed not allowing you to continue the racial status quo in the south
February 21, 2013 1:40 p.m.
This is only for persons brought here a juveniles, who would not be prosecuted in a court anyway? Compredes?
February 21, 2013 1:35 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:33 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:32 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:30 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:29 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:26 p.m.
So them having licenses is going to make them register their cars and pay issuance? Good luck with that.
Maybe we can change the laws so if someone without insurance damages your properly they have to work it off as indentured servants.
February 21, 2013 1:25 p.m.
February 21, 2013 1:24 p.m.