Raleigh, N.C. — Rep. Mark Brody, R-Union, and three fellow Republicans have filled a bill that would put a moratorium on a state program that issues licenses to some drivers who are in the U.S. illegally.
State transportation officials have announced they will start issuing driver’s licenses and ID cards on March 25 to some people who entered the country illegally. Created by a presidential executive order, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program blocks deportation of and grants work permits to those who were brought to the country illegally as young children.
House Bill 141 would put the state license program on hold until at least June 15.
"The executive order is controversial," Brody said Thursday morning. "We had no say in it."
The legislature, he said, should have time to study the matter and submit bills address the program.
One possibility, he said, would be that supporters of the program might file a bill to redesign the license. As currently announced, identity cards issued to those in the DACA program would be vertical, expire on the date their deferral period ends and carry a message indicating that it confers no legal status upon the holder.
“North Carolina should not be making it harder for aspiring citizens to integrate and contribute to our communities by branding them with a second-class driver’s license,” Raul Pinto, a lawyer with the ACLU, said in a news release.
The release wasn't issued in response to the pending legislation.
The moratorium, Brody said, could also give opponents of issuing the special licenses time to pass a bill instructing Division of Motor Vehicles to end the practice entirely.
"It doesn't set any policy whatsoever. It just gives everybody time to look at it," Brody said.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/business/2013/05/06/12417151/2457a21a00d94324b6fc448c8ec173d0-Photo-1-100x70.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
No they didn't actually.
If you are here illegally you can NOT apply to be here legally until you have left the country for 10 years.
So they'd have to have packed up at 18, moved back to a nation they know nothing about, don't know anyone in, and possibly don't even speak the language of.
Then spend 10 years there.
And first THEN be able to apply to go back to the only home they had ever known, with no guarantee they'd get back in.
That's insane to suggest that's a reasonable option for anybody.
February 22, 2013 1:45 p.m.
February 22, 2013 12:40 p.m.
February 22, 2013 12:35 p.m.
What choice, exactly?
You wanted them, when they turned 18, to self-deport themselves to a country they have no memory of, know nobody in, and might not even speak the language of?
that's not really choice. Not a sane one anyway.
February 22, 2013 10:32 a.m.
February 22, 2013 8:01 a.m.
Some of these "children" are 31 years old. Yes, I do think they've had a choice at this point.
Which reminds me. What does 0bama have planned for the infant-to-14 age range that he's not telling us till he's ready to force it? Surely he doesn't plan to split families? That's what I thought, everybody gets to stay after all.
February 21, 2013 8:37 p.m.
For myself, I have no issue with thoughtful arguments but the tone of hatred spewed by so many is disheartening.
February 21, 2013 6:08 p.m.
February 21, 2013 5:39 p.m.
You seem to miss one very important thing. A drivers license, when conveyed to another state that does not have that restriction - will be convered to a regular drivers license.
What does a drivers license convey? It conveys that they have shown evidence that they are a Citizen. Here is the list of documents required:
1. Proof of Age and Identity. 2. Proof of Social Security. 3. Proof of Residency. 4. Proof of Liability Insurance.
#1-4 are often forged instruments, that being said on #3:
If you are a U.S. citizen and a first-time customer in North Carolina, you must show proof of your residence address in this state.
If you are not a U.S. citizen, you must provide documentation issued by the U.S. government indicating legal presence.
Now, I don't know about you, but the law would give them the same rights as a legal.
February 21, 2013 5:31 p.m.
Tata said that is what they would be like and that is why not issued right away, so that the changes could be made. Also, why he revoked the 13 already out. Are u saying he isn't telling the truth?
February 21, 2013 5:27 p.m.