Bill redefines sex education 'expert'

Posted September 15, 2015

— ​Just about anyone could be an expert who signs off on sex education curriculum under a bill that cleared the House Rules Committee on Tuesday. That would open the door to "questionable" curricula that doesn't provide all the information teens need being taught in public schools, according to teen pregnancy prevention advocates.

"It's absolutely true that, as written right now, it (sex education curricula) could be determined by your auto mechanic, your hair dresser or your preacher," said Elizabeth Finley, communications director for SHIFT NC, a nonprofit focused on preventing teen pregnancy and curbing sexually transmitted diseases.

Senate Bill 279 initially dealt with the qualifications for license professional counselors. In the House Rules Committee, two sections were tacked on dealing with sex education in public schools. One section would require that schools teach about the hazards of sex trafficking. The other changes legislative language dealing with who must sign off on sex education curricula.

Lawmakers expect the bill to be heard in the House on Wednesday.

The current law reads that such course material must be "accepted by professionals and credentialed experts in the field of sexual health education." The new language would simply read "credentialed experts," widening the number of people who could sign off on sex education materials to just about anyone with any sort of certificate or degree.

Rep. Chris Whitmire, R-Transylvania, said the current definition "so narrows the pool of folks who are qualified or credentialed to actually review the reproductive health curriculum, that it's a very small pool." Whitmire and Rep. Skip Stam, R-Wake, both described the existing experts as "eccentric" and prone to rejecting material put forward by "well-respected" groups and individuals.

Whitmire specifically pointed to James Dobson and his Focus on the Family group, which provides religious-based materials that stress abstinence-only education. He said that one reason he was pushing the change in language is because schools that choose to use information like Dobson's stood to be challenged under current law.

Finley said that, while material urging abstinence only might be well-intentioned, it can do more harm than good. In the past five years, she said, the number of teen pregnancies has declined in the state even as the population has grown. That's a testament, she said, to curricula that recognize the need for information about condoms and other pregnancy prevention measures.

Whitmire said it should be up to each community what is taught in schools. The curricula is set by a combination of a school boards and a local health advisory committee.

"They make that decision," he said.

His language would give the local communities more options.

"We give them the opportunity to make well-informed decisions," he said.

Before House Rules voted to send the measure to the floor, they discussed a potential amendment that would narrow the definition of "expert" in the bill.

Stam said the list of expertise would include things like medicine, adolescent psychology or health education.

Finley said she was unsure whether that potential amendment, which will be offered on the floor, would keep less rigorous curricula out without first seeing it.

Rep. Tricia Cotham, D-Mecklenburg, said she believed the point of the new language was to reintroduce abstinence-only education into schools and was skeptical that the potential amendment would be strong enough.

"Clearly there's a hidden agenda here," Cotham said, adding that conservative lawmakers have sought to roll back sex education requirements ever since they were put in place. "We need to get our hands out of this."


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Terry Lightfoot Sep 16, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Agree, agree....I have personally written him three letters outlining my disagreements with his legislation and was respectful in getting my point across, but have yet to even receive an email reply from any member of his staff...gross mishandling of responding to the people who he represents, his government email is, if you care to let me know how we feel

  • Terry Lightfoot Sep 16, 2015
    user avatar

    hidden agenda, plain and simple

  • Nathaniel Grubbs Sep 16, 2015
    user avatar

    "Whitmire... said that one reason he was pushing the change in language is because schools that choose to use information like Dobson's stood to be challenged under current law."

    Yes, and including a religiously-based curriculum would somehow not be challenged even if this specific law is changed. Right. Have fun with those First Amendment law suits.

  • Randy Riddle Sep 16, 2015
    user avatar

    Skip Stam is setting up a local school board for an expensive separation of church and state lawsuit when one or more parents challenge a Focus on the Family sex-ed curriculum. Their materials are based on faith and bogus science and won't hold up to objective scrutiny.

  • mykesmovies Sep 16, 2015

    GOP is so fixated with sex, creepy weird.

  • George Herbert Sep 15, 2015
    user avatar

    Focus on the Family is a leading hate group against LGBT rights. It is closely affiliated with the North Carolina Family Policy Council, one of the leading proponents of North Carolina's so-called marriage protection amendment.

  • H.D. Derrington Sep 15, 2015
    user avatar

    Didn't John Oliver have a Last Week Tonight episode about this? Where is the requirement that the information be medically accurate. And I do agree that children should be taught what consent looks like. We don't want any Yale fraternity incidents.

  • John Snow Sep 15, 2015
    user avatar

    Abstinence should definitely be taught but as part of a comprehensive program which gives info on prevention methods also.

  • Roy Hinkley Sep 15, 2015
    user avatar

    Nice of Rep. Stam to specifically mention that expertise could include adolescent psychology....since Dobson happens to be a psychologist.

  • Matt Wood Sep 15, 2015
    user avatar

    And what, exactly, makes James Dobson an "expert" in anything but hate-filled propaganda?