Raleigh, N.C. — Sen. Phil Berger, the top leader in the N.C. Senate, says any new law requiring voters to show identification at the polls should include a photo ID requirement.
"It does not have to be a drivers license as far as I'm concerned," Berger said. "For me, there are two requirements. One, that it's a photograph -- a government issued some sort of photograph. And two, that the bill will meet the constitutional standards that have been laid down."
More than 600,000 registered voters may not have a valid state-issued ID, according to analysis by the State Board of Elections. Berger said that, while there are likely voters without ID, he doubted the number was quite that high.
A spokesman for House Speaker Thom Tillis said that the Mecklenburg Republican also believed the state ought to work toward a photo ID requirement.
Asked if the state would leave it to counties to pay for special voter identification cards for those without proper state identification, Berger said he did not think so. Such special IDs are one way states have ensured their voter ID requirements pass constitutional muster, but they can be costly.
"I don't see us passing along to the counties an unfunded mandate," Berger said.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)







WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
We all know why certain people oppose picture ID's to vote. It's time we quit letting them stand on their absurd arguments.
January 23, 2013 3:40 p.m.
January 21, 2013 4:28 p.m.
January 21, 2013 2:00 p.m.
Also has anyone considered that some of the 600,000 may not be eligible to vote, but did? Is any followup work being done on the 600,000 to identify why they did not have licenses.
Could we go the other way and identify how many licensed drivers are not registered to vote?
January 18, 2013 6:54 p.m.
January 17, 2013 11:10 p.m.
Agreed that proper ID of a Voter is paramount, but there are other ways to verify a person is who they claim. Every time I've voted in NC, there was a lap-top in front of the poll-worker. What is to stop the BOE from accessing DMV and viewing my photo? There is no need to show an ID, the poll-worker can tell right away if I'm who I say I am.
We already have the pieces in place to counter fraud. Whether or not we use it (I believe we do) is probably a function of time vs. money vs. risk of fraud...
I think that before we really progress with this discussion we need more info: a statistical analysis of how many potential voter could be disenfranchised vs the number of potential fraud stopped, and the real in-depth review of how BOE goes about confirming Registration Forms and then again verifying the Voter at the poll.
Cheers!
January 17, 2013 11:09 p.m.
January 17, 2013 10:40 p.m.
January 17, 2013 8:22 p.m.
January 17, 2013 7:44 p.m.
January 17, 2013 5:58 p.m.