Political News

Army to cut brigades at 10 US bases

Posted June 25, 2013

— In a massive restructuring, the U.S. Army is slashing the number of active-duty combat brigades from 45 to 33 and shifting thousands of soldiers out of bases around the country as it moves forward with a longtime plan to cut the size of the service by 80,000.

Officials say the sweeping changes would eliminate brigades at 10 Army bases in the U.S. by 2017, including in Texas, Kentucky, Georgia, Colorado, North Carolina, New York, Kansas and Washington. The Army will also cut thousands of other jobs across the service, including soldiers in units that support the brigades, and two brigades in Germany have already been scheduled for elimination.

At Fort Bragg, the 4th Brigade Combat Team of the 82nd Airborne Division will be eliminated, spokesman Tom McCollum said. But three other brigades on post will be expanding by one battalion each, he said.

"This is almost a wash," McCollum said, noting a battalion is between 600 to 1,200 soldiers and a brigade is about 3,500 soldiers.

The 4th Brigade is less than a decade old. It's unclear how many soldiers in the brigade will be reassigned to the other brigades and how many might be forced to leave the Army.

Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army chief of staff, has said he hopes to be able to cut the 80,000 soldiers through voluntary departures, without forcing troops to leave the service. But Army leaders have not ruled out forced reductions.

Fort Bragg Sign Army restructuring 'a wash' at Bragg

The Army is being reduced in size from a high of about 570,000 during the peak of the Iraq war to 490,000 as part of efforts to cut the budget and reflect the country's military needs as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan end. Additional reductions could be required if Congress allows automatic budget cuts to continue into next year.

While the cuts may have less impact at Fort Bragg, they could be more painful for communities around some of the smaller installations such as Fort Knox, where currently only one brigade is based.

The other seven U.S. bases that will lose a brigade are: Fort Bliss in Texas, Fort Campbell in Kentucky, Fort Carson in Colorado, Fort Drum in New York, Fort Riley in Kansas, Fort Stewart in Georgia, and Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington. Soldiers in the deactivated brigades would be transferred to other units.

The overall cut in size has been known for more than a year, and Army leaders have been working on how to manage the reduction, conducting local community meetings across the country and releasing an extensive study on the issue earlier this year.

Under the plan set to be announced Tuesday, the Army will increase the size of its infantry and armor brigades by adding another battalion. Adding the battalion was a recommendation from commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan, who said it would beef up the fighting capabilities of the brigades when they go to war.

The cuts do not affect National Guard or Reserve brigades and units.

Officials said the decisions on the cuts were based on a variety of factors including required training resources, ranges, air space and infrastructure, as well as the need to put units near leadership and headquarters units.

41 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • hardycitrus Jun 26, 3:26 p.m.

    Russia has one foreign base, one aircraft carrier, and almost no allies.

  • HolyGoloBatman Jun 26, 1:21 p.m.

    "How big should the army be when we are not at war? - Viewer"

    The reason we are not at war is because of our Army, Air Force, Maries, Navy and all the brave men and women who serve in them. In years past other nations feared us so the peace was kept. Now they laugh at us and seek to destroy us from within. This army is our family, and family comes first!

    Our army needs out support, not our disdain. And that should be the priority of any sitting president as well as the people who benefit from the security they get from these fine men and women.

  • lopo Jun 26, 1:18 p.m.

    I have always seen democrats cut the military after a war but never during one. I guess its the first for anything in this administration, but hey at least we have gay rights :)

  • The Soldier Jun 26, 12:09 p.m.

    May God help US. I'm in the military and I can honestly say that If this happens then we will surly fail.!

  • HolyGoloBatman Jun 26, 11:55 a.m.

    How about if we take back the $1.5 TRILLION that we're giving Obama's Brotherhood and use it for our toops!!! Oh, that's right this guy wants to see us fail. A country without a strong military is doomed - I am sure somebody smart said that at one time or another.

    If something needs to be closed down and it's people fired how about we start with the White House! Then the House and Senate. But wait, wait - we keep reelecting these incompetents so let's fire us!

  • btneast Jun 26, 11:36 a.m.

    why do we need troops overseas, close the bases, cut the waste lets focus on 'Merica and rebuilding our country

    Wow, don't think that can be answered properly here......but your lack of understanding of basic human nature is evident....primarily that "nature abhors a vacuum". Also coming to mind "all evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing".

  • Viewer Jun 26, 9:24 a.m.

    How big should the army be when we are not at war?

  • JustAName Jun 26, 8:12 a.m.

    When are they going to start cutting entitlements, the EPA, and the IRS? Or for that matter, the perks that the congress gets?

  • nav2011Raleigh Jun 26, 8:04 a.m.

    "Officials said the decisions on the cuts were based on a variety......."
    THIS IS PART OF OBAMA'S MASTER PLAN TO DESTROY THE USA!

  • ratracehwy64 Jun 25, 6:59 p.m.

    How about bringing them home and letting them seal our southern border instead of hiring all these new agents? Illegal immigration would come to a crawl. Yes, the stupidity of our congress once again rears its head, just like the 90's...

More...